On 12/10/14 12:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote:
Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone.
I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the
repository, and I will keep doing that in the future.
I have a last question (technical one this time). Do you build Wireshark
for
On 12/15/14, 8:39 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
On 12/10/14 12:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote:
Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone.
I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the
repository, and I will keep doing that in the future.
I have a last question
Hi,
Note that under GPL you are obliged to supply the source code of your
modifications if you distribute binaries to your customers.
I would use the development version to get the bleeding edge stuff or the
latest stable if stability is more of an issue.
Regards
Anders
From:
Hi Anders,
Yes! I was aware of the licensing terms. Is it mandatory to provide the
source in the same bundle as the binary or on the other hand. I can mention
in our documentation that the source code is available, and if they ask for
it, provide it?
Thanks for the advice regarding the
And as you'll have to make the source of your customizations available, you
might as well submit them to the core project where they'll be maintained
and packages for all your required platforms will be automatically built.
On 10 December 2014 at 15:13, Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com
Hi Juan,
We have a Solaris 10 buildbot (
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris%2010%20SPARC) but
nothing for Solaris 9.
On 10 December 2014 at 17:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa jua...@rti.com
wrote:
Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone.
I already pushed some of my
Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone.
I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the repository,
and I will keep doing that in the future.
I have a last question (technical one this time). Do you build Wireshark
for Solaris (9 and 10)? I am facing issues doing it and I
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:13:08 +
From: Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version to use for
customization
Message-ID
On 2014-12-10 15:21, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa wrote:
Hi Anders,
Yes! I was aware of the licensing terms. Is it mandatory to provide
the source in the same bundle as the binary or on the other hand. I
can mention in our documentation that the source code is available,
and if they ask for it,
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:08:25 -0700
From: Stephen Fisher sfis...@sdf.org
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version to use for
customization
Message-ID: 20141210180825.ga29...@sdf.org
Content
On 10 December 2014 at 18:53, John Dill john.d...@greenfieldeng.com wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:08:25 -0700
From: Stephen Fisher sfis...@sdf.org
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:13:08PM -0500, John Dill wrote:
Does the license only apply to those to whom the binary has been
distributed to? If the plugin is never publicly released, does the
license imply that only the receivers of the plugin are required to be
sent the source code? If
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote:
A Wireshark plugin links with the main body of the program and thus is
covered by the licence of the main program.
From the GPL FAQ:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLAndPlugins
If I write a
13 matches
Mail list logo
