Title: Re: Witango-Talk: upgrade issues.
There is an encoding setup in IIS that sometimes needs to be set to use the taf and tml and tcf files so they run through the web server.
Select the site then properties. Then the home or Virtual directory tab. Click on configuration.
Make sure it is
Title: Re: Witango-Talk: upgrade issues.
Maybe Phil can reply here. I thought that version fixed the problem and the issue was with size now and was intentional
( From a previous post by Phil:
Now on to cookies other the reserved mentioned above
Tested
Ver. Cookie Name Max Length
WITANGO DEV STUDIOS v5.5: All Witango 5.0 Studios (or upgrades thereto)
purchased on or after 1 October 2003 will be eligible for a free upgrade to
Witango 5.5 Standard Studio when released in December this year. Studio
pricing will NOT change in Australian dollar terms, HOWEVER, will change in
Got both emails. Thanks Kel!
WITANGO DEV STUDIOS v5.5: All Witango 5.0 Studios (or upgrades thereto)
purchased on or after 1 October 2003 will be eligible for a free upgrade to
Witango 5.5 Standard Studio when released in December this year. Studio
pricing will NOT change in Australian dollar
I am in the process of rebuilding an application so it can be resold to
customers.
In some cases customers will elect to have me manage the hosting which I
will be contracting out.
I could build one database and manage the data with one set of taf files and
then pull data based on the site ID (
Is anyone here using Corda Popcharts as a chart generating engine? If so,
would it be possible for you to send me one of your taf files so I can see
how you structured your query and your results dataset? Thanks!
Sincerely,
Gene Wolf
I asked the folks at Corda whether they had any code examples of their
product with Witango. Below is the answer I received. Might be a call to
action. *winks*
Gene,
We do not have any examples for Witango, and have not had any requests for
this until now. The only
I have a question about either method. Would it be possible to login under
on site. Manually change the siteid in the url and then be surfing another
site (logged in)? If so, are there any security issues with this? What would
happen to the session id?
Thanks
Steve Fogelson
Internet Commerce
We are currently using Spitfire for much of our charting. It's a good
product and we have been using it over a year. One of our internal customers
however has some requirements that Spitfire cannot handle. This requires us
to go to a more sophisticated (read, more complicated) tool and Popcharts
Hi Steve, and Dan,
Potentially yes, if the Domain address has not actually changed - just the SiteID
argument.
I've built a similar system to what Dan is describing, and the trick to get around
this
potential security risk, is not to be dependant on the SiteID as an argument (POST or
Search)
My site table would include:
id
url
etc.
My user table would include:
userid
password
site_id
etc.
Then, if not logged in:
query the site table based on the url to get the site id
query the user table to verify authenticate userid, password, siteid
Then set
Title: Re: Witango-Talk: upgrade issues.
Actually, b is output as b
and TableTRTDtest/TD/TR/Table
is output just like that also.
Bradley J.Robertson
FleetDirect
Commercial Fleet Services, Sales,
Parts
www.fleetdirect.net
(p)602.462.5343
I use Corda extensively. You can see some of it here: http://fc.benchmarkportal.com
login as 'demo' and 'demo'
I'm attaching one of the more simple query/graph .tafs. Sometimes it can be difficult
to write the WiTango code to manipulate the resultset into the format that Corda needs
-
Hi Brad,
I too think it may be encoding - can you run the
following and see what is returned - you should get
the following:
none: test
multiline: btest/b
multilinehtml: test
metahtml: test
url: %3Cb%3Etest%3C%2Fb%3E
--- Brad Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, b is output as b and
Hey guys,
For those of you who have some idea of tango internals... I'm wondering is
there any performance hit to using lots of includes that are common to all
files, rather than having each file have common actions.
In other words, if I setup 20 files with:
@INCLUDE FILE=header.inc
at the very
Jim,
Includes require a fetch and parse, if the include is not already in
memory or if include caching is off. This fetch could be expensive. Even
if it is memory resident, some overhead always exists.
This isn't to say that the fetch outweighs portability benefits. The
trade-off usually works
That said, there is something new to watch out for. This is not a
well-known bit of Witango, but it was found that self-calling @include
statements were problematic (especially the infinite ones), so there is
now a limitation on how many includes (nested or not) a single action
will execute.
Hey All!
Noticed a trait with comments today that I noticed a LONG time ago and I
thought somebody would have fixed now. Quiz question, what's wrong with this
comment:
@! we do this because we need the timestamp for more than one operation and
we can't afford it to be different
If you answered
18 matches
Mail list logo
