te + Innovate with the **
> Integrated Environmental Solutions Limited. Registered in Scotland No.
> SC151456
> Registered Office - Helix Building, West Of Scotland Science Park,
> Glasgow G20 0SP
> Email Disclaimer
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto
Hello,
Does change of Package/@InstallPrivileges attribute to "perMachine" do
anything else than sets ALLUSERS to "1"?
We have several deferred CustomActions with Impersonate attribute set to
"no" for elevated privileges and they seem to stop working on systems
with UAC.
Regards,
Jan
-
t; Registered Office - Helix Building, West Of Scotland Science Park,
> Glasgow G20 0SP
> Email Disclaimer
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 25 March 2010 00:35
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: [Wi
Hello,
I have found a very strange problem.
In my installer i'm creating several registry keys and values (COM
assembly registration). They are all created without any issues, they
are fully accessible using registry editor, they have sufficient
permissions to be accessed by any local user, but
Hello,
I've created new Product version installer (minor update) which contains
brand-new Feature. When i try to reinstall this new version using
REINSTALL and REINSTALMODE properties over the older version, then the
new Feature doesn't get installed. When i try to install it on a clean
machine
actual numeric values of the INSTALLSTATE_* values.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:04 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How to uninstall other p
ates that are part of your
> complexity?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:43 PM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How to uninstall other products d
n on that feature to not install the add-on in your
> initial transaction if the required framework was not initially installed.
> MsiConfigureFeature will then be able to install the feature.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sa
wrote:
> Turn on verbose logging via the installer logging policy. What are the
> values of the feature-related properties? What happens to feature/component
> states?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:47
e with the ADDLOCAL property
> set to the indicated feature when the feature is not already installed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:20 AM
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: R
nce to the API MsiConfigureFeature() was intended to have it called
> by the main application whenever it detects that the add-on isn't installed
> but the framework is. End users don't have to do a thing (except run the
> main application).
>
> -Original Message-
&
anks.
Jan
Blair wrote:
> Put both into the same MSI, but under different features.
>
> >From your main application, add the "add-on" feature when .net 3.5 is
> discovered. MsiConfigureFeature() would possibly be a good candidate.
>
> -----Original Message-
&
Hello,
I've got following problem...
I have got a main application and an add-on tool. The add-on can be
installed only if .net framework 3.5 is installed and main application
must be able to install the add-on when user updates his system to .net 3.5.
My current solution consists of two indepe
e an example for why you require elevated privileges? I ask
> because I recently rearchitected our installer to remove that
> requirement.
>
> -Brooke
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:52 AM
> To:
Hello again,
I'm using simular custom actions in my installer:
I need to execute them under current (logged in) user, who has admin
privileges. Everything works fine except for systems with UAC turned on
(Vista,Win7). The CAs get executed under SYSTEM user.
So i'd like to ask you how to make i
my looks like this:
...
* **
...
... *
1
1
Hope this will help. Huge thanks for any support.
Sincerely,
Jan
Bob Arnson wrote:
> Jan Bilek wrote:
>
>> When i try to define my own version of MsiRMF
Hello and thanks for your support.
I've managed to get rid off the FilesInUse (i've created own UI and
defined the FilesInUse dialog with appropriate attributes), but the same
method doesn't work for MsiRMFilesInUse dialog, which is being displayed
during the uninstallation without UI.
When i t
has a little ok guid.
> http://www.dizzymonkeydesign.com/blog/misc/adding-and-customizing-dlgs-in-wix-3/
>
> You can also use the guide here by Gábor DEÁK JAHN :
> http://www.tramontana.co.hu/wix/lesson2.php
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
> 2009/4/24 Jan Bilek
>
>
>> Thanks for the link.
where the FilesInUse is defined?
Thanks for any help.
Jan
Brian Simoneau wrote:
> http://www.installsite.org/pages/en/msifaq/a/1042.htm
>
> -Brian Simoneau
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Bilek [mailto:bil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 2
Hello,
Is there any easy way (attribute/property to be set) how to disable
"Files In Use" dialog which pops up during the uninstallation process. I
simply don't want to bother user with this dialog even if all of
installed executables are running.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Jan
--
Hello,
My problem is simple: I need to ask user before an uninstallation
begins, whether he wants to keep or remove user created files (settings,
database, etc.).
Is it somehow possible to spawn custom dialog during the uninstallation
even if the InstallUISequence is bypassed?
Is the only way ho
21 matches
Mail list logo
