today.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Petersen [mailto:chad.peter...@harlandfs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:44 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
An 8.3 filename (also called a short
compatibility with legacy programs.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Kolb [mailto:d...@dotnetcodeslingers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:03 AM
To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
Thanks Chad as
7;General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
Blair thanks but I have to confess to not understanding that explanation
at
all. What would be such a case that an XP or Vista user saw a short name
instead of the NTFS na
olset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
Blair thanks but I have to confess to not understanding that explanation
at
all. What would be such a case that an XP or Vista user saw a short name
instead of the NTFS name? - Dave
-Original Message-
F
: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
Shortcut names are exposed to users on XP systems and may be exposed to them
on Vista systems, depending on whether they have had a native resource dll
string table entry a
Subject: [WiX-users] Are shortcut names even useful anymore?
I don't use any shortcut names in my install and notice they are generated
for me with some seemingly random letters.
Are actual shortcut names even useful on any .NET 3.5 system which is the
requirement for my application?
I
I don't use any shortcut names in my install and notice they are generated
for me with some seemingly random letters.
Are actual shortcut names even useful on any .NET 3.5 system which is the
requirement for my application?
I'm also OK with requiring an NTFS [non FAT32] disk though I'm not
7 matches
Mail list logo
