Re: [WiX-users] Digitally signing packages

2007-10-13 Thread Chris Ridd
On 13 Oct 2007, at 13:56, Mike Dimmick wrote: > The DigitalCertificate element is for: > > a) validating signatures on external cabinets (presumably built > separately > with makecab); > > b) (MSI 3.0 and later) indicating the set of certificates which are > allowed > to sign patches that can

Re: [WiX-users] Digitally signing packages

2007-10-13 Thread Mike Dimmick
- Mike Dimmick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Ridd Sent: 09 October 2007 08:10 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [WiX-users] Digitally signing packages The wix schema seems to have support for digitally signing packages - the Dig

Re: [WiX-users] Digitally signing packages

2007-10-09 Thread Chris Ridd
On 9 Oct 2007, at 15:49, John Vottero wrote: >> The wix schema seems to have support for digitally signing packages - >> the DigitalCertificate element, the DigitalCertificateRef element - >> but I can't see how they're meant to be used. >> >> Presumably light has to have access to the certificat

Re: [WiX-users] Digitally signing packages

2007-10-09 Thread John Vottero
> The wix schema seems to have support for digitally signing packages - > the DigitalCertificate element, the DigitalCertificateRef element - > but I can't see how they're meant to be used. > > Presumably light has to have access to the certificate's private key > at some point, and it isn't clear

[WiX-users] Digitally signing packages

2007-10-09 Thread Chris Ridd
The wix schema seems to have support for digitally signing packages - the DigitalCertificate element, the DigitalCertificateRef element - but I can't see how they're meant to be used. Presumably light has to have access to the certificate's private key at some point, and it isn't clear to me