On Mon, August 15, 2011, Paul Seelig wrote:
> I think that "stable" should be replaced by the term "legacy", and a
> stable release should take an empty placeholder instead. The legacy
> wmaker version should definitely be marked as obviously outdated, with a
> stable release still waiting to mate
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:43:15 -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
I am pleased to announce the preview of the new Window Maker site.
http://amanda.windowmaker.org/
The only thing left to do now is to port the information from the old
site (http://archive.windowmaker.org) to the new one. Hopefully
Hi,
I try to update the debian folder. I have many many many patches :-( I
will try to sort them and then sent to this list.
I have some questions too, the most important:
1. There is a package in debian called wmaker-data, with icons. Should
we move these icons to the upstream version? Is t
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 11:26:45 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> 4. I included a patch for a Russian wmaker manpage with an error (lintian)
The patch does not apply and it seems to be broken (I can't read it...not
that I understand russian, but the encoding seems screwed up).
Your email has
On 08/16/2011 11:54 AM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 11:26:45 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
4. I included a patch for a Russian wmaker manpage with an error (lintian)
The patch does not apply and it seems to be broken (I can't read it...not
that I understand russian, but t
New upstream versin (0.94)
debian/patches are now DEP-3
debian/copyright is now DEP-5
regards
0002-New-upstream-version-now-from-git-debian-patches-are.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
* New manpages
debian/manpages/wdread.1
debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
This patch do not solve the problem about the manpages (lintian),
because there is an error in the wmaker.manpages file (next patch)
regards.
kix
0001-New-manpages.patch.gz
Descr
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:33:33PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
>
> I think that "stable" should be replaced by the term "legacy", and a
> stable release should take an empty placeholder instead. The legacy
> wmaker version should definitely be marked as obviously outdated, with a
> stable release st
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:21:14 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> * New manpages
> debian/manpages/wdread.1
> debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
> debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/ folder
(i.e. they should not be debian-only)
--
To
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:26:45AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> 2. Many files are architecture independent, like images. We get a
> lintian error about many files in /usr/ and probably the best is
> move them to an architecture independent "wmaker-" package. The
> package wmaker-data c
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:33:03 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:26:45AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
2. Many files are architecture independent, like images. We get a
lintian error about many files in /usr/ and probably the best is
move them to an architecture independent
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:30:34 +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:21:14 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
* New manpages
debian/manpages/wdread.1
debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:44:31 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> >
> >Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/ folder
> >(i.e. they should not be debian-only)
>
> Ok,
>
> we can move all the manpages in debian/manpages to doc,
The idea is that anything which can be useful to
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes into the
"official" repository as possible. The more things in upstream are the
less Debian patches
On 08/16/2011 04:21 PM, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes into the
"official" repository as possible. The mor
On 08/16/2011 04:44 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On 08/16/2011 04:21 PM, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 16:58:59 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Please, apply the patches :-)
I did, but rebased them too. Take a look at the result.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
I'm very glad to see that John Robinson has agreed to let wmaker-crm become the
official version -or at least that Carlos repo gets the front-page on the wmare
site. And glad to see the site get updated.
However, I have a small concern with the use of 0.94 as the next version. The
problem is th
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, next has been updated
via c2975ab510e3aef31b7afc7f254d302a8b5d46e7 (commit)
from 9777b14fb73b0a8d6
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, next has been updated
via 1c9c608bbffda44e2e16d160a6521977906173af (commit)
via acf3d05c911a5dfac
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, master has been updated
via a06b0673d8de6e65e8df00aafd2a7575adca6d38 (commit)
via d9296ff9a4f3e76
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the preview of the new Window Maker site.
The CMS is a MojoMojo instance, and *you* are invited to create an
account and get in and get your hands dirty!
I was looking at moving the FAQ documentation over, but that seems to
have fallen off of
Paul Harris wrote:
> what wiki is this based on?
MojoMojo.
> also, in regards to the mailing list, that is still going along ok on
> mailman
It's actually Enemies of Carlotta with MHonArc handling the web
archives.
> if you feel the need to change the system, I checked out a bunch of options
>
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 13:45:25 +0200, Gilbert wrote:
> Still, I would appreciate it if the wmaker-crm branch jumped to an
> official release of wmaker-1.1.
Not going to happen, sorry. I want to tag a wmaker-0.95.0 out of the
current 'master' in the next days.
> It's only about numbers anyway
On 08/16/2011 07:09, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I.e. let's keep the upstream sources (if wmaker-crm can be called like that)
> distro agnostic.
... or better yet, truly portable code? There are still a LOT of
windowmaker users in bsd-land.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but noth
On 08/16/2011 07:09, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I.e. let's keep the upstream sources (if wmaker-crm can be called like that)
> distro agnostic.
... or better yet, truly portable code? :) There are still a LOT of
windowmaker users in bsd-land.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but no
Hi!
in the debian folder there are some files with info about the asclock
dockapp. I think this info should be removed from these files.
Probably is because asclock was included in the wmaker package, but not now.
Should I remove these lines?
Thanks.
wmaker-crm/debian$ grep asclock * | cut
On Mon, August 15, 2011, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> http://amanda.windowmaker.org/
That's real good news.
What about a list of links to binary packages? My unofficial
Debian repo might go there, also there might be others who build
snapshots from the git sources.
Cheers,
M'bert
--
--
On 08/16/2011 11:35 PM, Martin Dietze wrote:
On Mon, August 15, 2011, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
http://amanda.windowmaker.org/
That's real good news.
What about a list of links to binary packages? My unofficial
Debian repo might go there, also there might be others who build
snapshots from
It would be nice to have a way to review all work spaces (Thought I know
I have had a lot sometimes.)
Also a way to see all windows in a workspace.
And finally, a way to see the window in the alt-tab feature..
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
It would be totally awesome to have a feature where I can press
something like the meta key or the run dialog and it take the things I
type and look for similar items from any of my menu items. Even the
dynamic menus like directory structures. That way it doesn't take a lot
of indexing on slo
On Tue, August 16, 2011, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> "My unofficial Debian repo"??
>
> Probably is a better idea to have "Our official Debian repo" ;-)
Both makes sense. I've been providing snapshot builds from
Carlos' repo for a couple of months now. These will always be
kindof experimental as
On Wed, August 17, 2011, Jason Brower wrote:
> It would be totally awesome to have a feature where I can press something
> like the meta key or the run dialog and it take the things I type and look
That's not a window manager feature. I'm actually using gnome-do with
WM, and it works just like
33 matches
Mail list logo
