[wpkg-users] [Bug 145] Dependancy error when removing packages

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Meier 2009-04-08 08:20:20 --- @Falco: Could you verify using the version attached to Bug 150? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 Rainer Meier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Rainer Meier 2

[wpkg-users] [Bug 145] Dependancy error when removing packages

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145 Jason Oster changed: What|Removed |Added CC||parasy...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jaso

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 --- Comment #3 from Jason Oster 2009-04-08 00:31:35 --- Confirming the attached version contains the proper fix. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 Rainer Meier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 Rainer Meier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.me...@wpkg.org Status|NEW

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Meier 2009-04-07 23:21:50 --- Created an attachment (id=132) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=132) Fix for Bug 150. Well, I did not yet have time to verify your use-case but what I can say for sure is th

[wpkg-users] [Bug 150] New: Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage()

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150 Summary: Removal of dependancies fails; missing return value on removePackage() Product: WPKG Version: 1.1.x-M Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity

Re: [wpkg-users] VSO image resizer

2009-04-07 Thread Chris Wilcox
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:06:06 +0200 > From: r.me...@wpkg.org > To: awill...@mdah.state.ms.us > CC: wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org > Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] VSO image resizer > > Hi Adam, > > Adam Williams wrote: > > Does anyone know how make this application silently install? > > http://www.vso

Re: [wpkg-users] VSO image resizer

2009-04-07 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Adam, Adam Williams wrote: > Does anyone know how make this application silently install? > http://www.vso-software.fr/products/image_resizer/ > > i've tried the usual things like msiexec /qn /i > vso_image_resizer2_setup.exe, or passing it flags like /s, /q, /quiet, > etc. nothing seems

[wpkg-users] VSO image resizer

2009-04-07 Thread Adam Williams
Does anyone know how make this application silently install? http://www.vso-software.fr/products/image_resizer/ i've tried the usual things like msiexec /qn /i vso_image_resizer2_setup.exe, or passing it flags like /s, /q, /quiet, etc. nothing seems to work. or do you know of another free im

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Romuald MAIRE schrieb: > Marco Gaiarin a écrit : >> Mandi! Romuald MAIRE >> In chel di` si favelave... >> >> >>> I'm thinking about that, and another problem ... Can WPKG take rights >>> and environment of the currently logged user ? >>> Because i don't know which user will logon on computers

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Romuald MAIRE In chel di` si favelave... > Thanks for the link, but i don't know the user password, never ... So it > doesn't work ! AFAIK as sudo (for unix), can be configured to ask no password at all. > The solution based to install 2 wpkg clients with 2 wpkg servers (in same > hos

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Romuald MAIRE
Marco Gaiarin a écrit : Mandi! Romuald MAIRE In chel di` si favelave... I'm thinking about that, and another problem ... Can WPKG take rights and environment of the currently logged user ? Because i don't know which user will logon on computers, all users are domain users ... And if i use

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Romuald MAIRE In chel di` si favelave... > I'm thinking about that, and another problem ... Can WPKG take rights > and environment of the currently logged user ? > Because i don't know which user will logon on computers, all users are > domain users ... > And if i use common admin user,

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Romuald MAIRE schrieb: >> Also, I think everyone will be glad to hear if it worked for you and >> what changes you made. > I'm thinking about that, and another problem ... Can WPKG take rights > and environment of the currently logged user ? I don't think any Windows program can. You always nee

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Romuald MAIRE
Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit : > Romuald MAIRE schrieb: > I think there is no way to my problems ... >>> >>> Try what Marco suggested? >>> >> >> Not yet, but it seem to be the only solution i have. So i will try in >> this way ! >> >> Thank you all for your help, and congratulation for WPKG. >>

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Romuald MAIRE schrieb: >>> I think there is no way to my problems ... >> >> Try what Marco suggested? >> > > Not yet, but it seem to be the only solution i have. So i will try in > this way ! > > Thank you all for your help, and congratulation for WPKG. > I hope the development will persist and

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Romuald MAIRE
Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit : > Romuald MAIRE schrieb: >> Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit : >>> Romuald MAIRE schrieb: >>> Or another idea is to add parameter to packages which says if the job must be called during normal execution (like now) or ONLY with the WPKG service and during the

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Romuald MAIRE schrieb: > Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit : >> Romuald MAIRE schrieb: >> >>> Or another idea is to add parameter to packages which says if the job >>> must be called during normal execution (like now) or ONLY with the >>> WPKG service and during the user session is opened ? >> >> It wou

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Romuald MAIRE
Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit : > Romuald MAIRE schrieb: > >> Or another idea is to add parameter to packages which says if the job >> must be called during normal execution (like now) or ONLY with the >> WPKG service and during the user session is opened ? > > It wouldn't change anything if it's st

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Romuald MAIRE In chel di` si favelave... > But what do you think to consider new WPKG function like following : ...no one prevent you to run two instances of WPKG (server side), the first (system-wide) with WPKGClient, the second (user) run by the way of a logon script, for example. For

Re: [wpkg-users] WPKG after user logon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

2009-04-07 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Romuald MAIRE schrieb: > Or another idea is to add parameter to packages which says if the job > must be called during normal execution (like now) or ONLY with the WPKG > service and during the user session is opened ? It wouldn't change anything if it's started during, before or after session