[wpkg-users] Definition change/Version #

So I've been fiddling with wpkg over the past week, and I dig how versatile it is while retaining it's simplicity. It's the perfect fit for the organization I work for. However, in my testing I've kicked up a possible problem; As I build packages and deploy them, I've discovered errors within the

Re: [wpkg-users] [Bug 175] Test return value of removeSettingsNode function

Chris Wilcox wrote: > > > I also use WPKG across 16 schools. One of the first things I did when > trialling and now using wpkg live was dredge out an old and unused PC > capable of running XP Pro and set this up as a test workstation for wpkg > packages before I roll things out to the live net

[wpkg-users] [Bug 177] Local install flag

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Meier 2009-10-05 13:13:59 --- > a) If the user has no right to install applications manually, but he can > queue an installation via e.g. a tool similar to wpkginst where he > has a choice of applications for installatio

Re: [wpkg-users] wrapper settings path mismatch problem

Marco Gaiarin schrieb: > Mandi! Falko Trojahn > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> usually I do such upgrade things using a package, see attached. >> > > A little question: why use: > > cmd /c start /min msiexec > > on install and simply only 'msiexec' on upgrade? > > > I'm curious..

Re: [wpkg-users] revision number problem

Mandi! Rainer Meier In chel di` si favelave... > However this punctuation is very uncommon (I've never seen that before). I I will use ':' just for it's 'strangness': well suited to mark and 'internal' subrevision number... Many thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

Re: [wpkg-users] wrapper settings path mismatch problem

Mandi! Falko Trojahn In chel di` si favelave... > usually I do such upgrade things using a package, see attached. A little question: why use: cmd /c start /min msiexec on install and simply only 'msiexec' on upgrade? I'm curious... ;))) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin

[wpkg-users] [Bug 177] Local install flag

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 --- Comment #2 from Falko Trojahn 2009-10-05 12:16:03 --- Hello Rainer, > Actually I am planning a feature like this for WPKG 1.2 release (I've got to > find some time to continue development). thanx for your quick reply, that's great. > Adding

Re: [wpkg-users] wrapper settings path mismatch problem

Hello Paul, > Hi, > I need some help to try and rectify a problem, of my making! > I manually edited the settings.xml to change from server1 to server2 but > missed the wrapper path and only changed the settings paths. > Now I have the path for the wrapper \\server1\wpkg\wpkg.js and the > setti

Re: [wpkg-users] revision number problem

Hi Marco, Am Montag, 5. Oktober 2009 11:27:15 schrieb Marco Gaiarin: > Mandi! Rainer Meier > In chel di` si favelave... > > > This is true as well and has been introduced quite recently by a heavy > > improvement of the version comparison algorithm. > > A little, probably unrelated question. T

Re: [wpkg-users] revision number problem

Hi Marco, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for > 'internal subrevision'? > EG, for now i use, for firefox: > > 30141 > > for 3.0.14 internal revision 1; i use internal revision because i'm > human and male, so i make mistakes ;), and

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange error...

Hi Marco, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > ...my first try, but the installer say: «you have just the latest > version, thanks.». ;((( > Seems there's no way to reinstall... Maybe it checks some (existing) registry keys and then exits. ProcessMonitor might help to detect the right entries, remove them and

Re: [wpkg-users] revision number problem

Mandi! Rainer Meier In chel di` si favelave... > This is true as well and has been introduced quite recently by a heavy > improvement of the version comparison algorithm. A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for 'internal subrevision'? EG, for now i use, for firefo

Re: [wpkg-users] Strange error...

Mandi! Rainer Meier In chel di` si favelave... > > Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Versione 5.7 > Seems to be the latest version. Maybe re-installing it > () > could help. Just try.

[wpkg-users] [Bug 177] Local install flag

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 Rainer Meier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rainer Meier

[wpkg-users] wrapper settings path mismatch problem

Hi, I need some help to try and rectify a problem, of my making! I manually edited the settings.xml to change from server1 to server2 but missed the wrapper path and only changed the settings paths. Now I have the path for the wrapper \\server1\wpkg\wpkg.js and the settings/software as \\server

[wpkg-users] [Bug 177] New: Local install flag

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177 Summary: Local install flag Product: WPKG Version: 1.1.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: wpkg.js

[wpkg-users] [Bug 176] WPKG Service crashes when using Offline mode

http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176 Marco Gaiarin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@sv.lnf.it --- Comment #1 from Marco G

Re: [wpkg-users] [Bug 175] Test return value of removeSettingsNode function

> > > Starting from the beginning again :) > > I adminster several small school networks and use wpkg to deploy packages to > several machines if it is quicker to use wpkg than to go around all > computers and do a manual install. > > I want to be able to test a new package out or a modified o