Hi Ben,
Thanks, that's great. I hadn't come across that one before. :)
How about the rest? Anyone got any ideas there?
Cheers,
Seona.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ben Bishop
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:51:39 +0100 (BST), Viking Karwur
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need your information about web design price and web
> design/dev document...
Viking,
I don't think you will find such off-topic information on a mailing
list devoted to Web Standards - certainly not from th
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 06:51:39 +0100 (BST), Viking Karwur wrote:
> I need your information about web design price and web
> design/dev document...
This is not a discussion related to standards.
Could any replies to this be made off list, please?
Viking, could you please try to stay ontopic?
warmly
> The final problem is when I try and validate the page. Everything validates,
> except the JavaScript for the menus. Now, this JavaScript is taken directly
> from the "Son of Suckerfish" so I was surprised to find that it was coming
Hi Seona,
Quick (but proper) fix for the JS validation, start w
Hello Guys,
I need your information about web design price and web
design/dev document...
Or where I can found it ?
Thanks in advanced.
Regards,
V. Karwur
---
=
--
Viking Karwur.
New Media Designer,
vikingkarwur.com
[p] +62-815-9170755
[w] www.vikingkarwur.com
_
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:09:36 -0700, ckimedia wrote:
> When styling a group of links one can simply change the display of
> the a:link and a:visited state to display block, making a simply
> line of links into a list. What is the advantage of using a for
> links as opposed to the aforemention
Ahhh great thanks russ...
What I will do is, remove the XML bit...
then change the css, and see how it looks then!
:)
Thanks a lot!
- Chris Stratford
russ - maxdesign wrote:
Chris,
>From a quick look, you seem have two problems - the box model issue and a
border issue:
1. IE misinterpret
Chris,
>From a quick look, you seem have two problems - the box model issue and a
border issue:
1. IE misinterprets the box model so your "navigation" div appears thinner
in this browser compared to other browsers.
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/about-boxmodel.htm
There are many ways to
It is also important to use proper markup for lists (and every other element) to
ensure accessibility compliance, see WCAG checkpoint 3.5
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT-TECHS/#tech-list-structure.
cheers
Iza
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/06/04 12:01 >>>
I believe its because, when you style it
Well you use lists because that's what navigation is, a list of links.
To give them letters, use the CSS property:
list-style-type:lower-alpha;
on your elements.
Chris Stratford wrote:
I believe its because, when you style it in CSS.
And make the LINKS, BLOCK ELEMENTS - without using 's.
Without t
Quoting a recent post of mine on
http://www.webxpertz.net/forums/showthread.php?t=29509:
"A 100% height table is 100% of the body. And the body is smaller then the
screen, so the table goes up to the bodys size.
Now, if you want a table to fill the whole screen, you must define 100%
height of the
I believe its because, when you style it in CSS.
And make the LINKS, BLOCK ELEMENTS - without using 's.
Without the stylesheet, the links will bunch up without any spaces or gaps.
So you use a and 's - just for the fact that it will be
backwards compatable with browsers which dont support CSS, an
No one can help?
I know its a stupid little task...
I tried encasing it in another div... but thats no good...
I know there are a lot of divs - SHELL, BODY, TITLE, NAV, CONTENT,
FOOTER, COPYRIGHT
i need the shell and body - because i want a background image running
up the sides of both of
Hi,
I meant , and I too agree that semantically the list seems more
sound. Thanks.
C
On Monday, June 28, 2004, at 05:05 PM, Mordechai Peller wrote:
ckimedia wrote:
When styling a group of links one can simply change the display of
the a:link and a:visited state to display block, making a simpl
Thanks Bart & Craig
I'd completely forgotten about all those emphasise tags, have replaced
with styled em's. Other suggestions will have to wait for the next round
of cleaning out old code.
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development & IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://
Ted Drake wrote:
As far as I know, the name attribute for creating anchor tags is being depricated. Is that the same for our forms? If I am using an input or selector, should I only use an id attribute or should I continue using the name as well?
Not just anchors, but for almost all elements. O
ckimedia wrote:
When styling a group of links one can simply change the display of
the a:link and a:visited state to display block, making a simply line
of links into a list. What is the advantage of using a for links
as opposed to the aforementioned, if any?
is actually more common, and u
Hi guys,
I have a new site that I'm working on for a client and am doing my best to
make it as standards-driven as possible. So aside from having a look and
telling me how I've done so far, I'd also like some help in fixing a couple
of little glitches that are annoying the heck out of me.
The fir
gives your links the number 1, 2, 3, etc.
On this line, how do I change it to A, B, C, a, b, c, etc.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: ckimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] As Good As the Weakest Link
Hi,
When styling a
Hi,
When styling a group of links one can simply change the display of the
a:link and a:visited state to display block, making a simply line of
links into a list. What is the advantage of using a for links as
opposed to the aforementioned, if any?
#navbar a:link, #navbar a:visited {
display
I need some clarification if possible before I get too involved in re-building some
forms.
As far as I know, the name attribute for creating anchor tags is being depricated. Is
that the same for our forms? If I am using an input or selector, should I only use an
id attribute or should I contin
Web Essentials Early Bird registration close this Thursday, July 1
Please note that our early bird special, of $100 off the regular price of
$750, closes this Thursday. To take advantage of this offer by midnight
Thursday, simply sign up:
http://www.we04.com/
Keep in mind too, if you are in Sydn
Hey Everyone,
www.neester.com is what I am working on.
I just made a new stylesheet for the site.
I just need some help with the DIVs...
Its a big issue at the moment.
I have right floated Navigation...
the Content, is just a DIV which is by default a BLOCK element, and
therefore uses all te
Hello.
Never managed to make left and right columns with 100% height.
Please take a look here:
http://seoed.cpea.ro/seo-terms-glossary
and tell me if you have some ideas.
CSS files:
http://seoed.cpea.ro/stylesheets/left.css
http://seoed.cpea.ro/stylesheets/right.css
http://seoed.cpea.ro/styleshe
Still looks like there's a few unnecessary tables in there - namely the ones
you are using to hold the images within the content.
What is this: ? Use and style using CSS
Just one minor warning when validating your CSS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A big thanks to everyone who turned up to the Melbourne WSG meeting
tonight.
We had 24 people turn up, which is a record for the Melbourne
meetings. Our diverse range of standards afficiondos included two
people who drove down from Ballarat (thanks guys - I really should
learn to remember everyone
Hi Avril,
The problem was due to having all my divs floated left in the one
containing div and relying on the containing div's width to make them
wrap, forcing them down into position.
Over the weekend, I split the content into two divs. Top and Bottom rows.
I believe that separating out the conte
A solution very good to avoid "embed" tag.
But to fulfill the norms of WAI accessibility I must have an alternative
auditory description, and when putting it like "Techniques for Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" they simultanealy leave the MOV and the WAV to
me. Some solution? One assumes
There are two reasons we changed over to using window.attachEvent. Firstly, its
is a IE only method so in effect it does its own branching for IE and secondly,
you can add multiple events on the same handler which means you could lump
several functions onto the onload handler rather than just the
awesome - thanks so much! Does that change have any negative side-effects?
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:27:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can make the suckerfish dropdowns work on IE5 Mac by using window.onload to
> trigger the suckerfish function rather than window.atta
You can make the suckerfish dropdowns work on IE5 Mac by using window.onload to
trigger the suckerfish function rather than window.attachEvent
So you can use
if (document.all && document.getElementById) window.onload = sfHover;
instead of
if (window.attachEvent) window.attachEvent("onload", sfH
Any comments about http://www.collovet.com.au/ would be appreciated
I have just stripped out a lot of tables and old style code and replaced
them with css menus and styling.
It should work in IE, Mozilla, Opera and Safari 1.2 degrading gracefully
for older versions (fingers crossed)
--
Neerav B
32 matches
Mail list logo
