[WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-04 Thread Adam Morris
Checked my site on a Mac OSX running Safari 1 yesterday. The little background image of the flower for the navigation list does not align itself to the left of the text link but 'floats' to the top of the link's background height. On my version of Safari (1.3), this does not happen, the flower acts

Re: [WSG] css title styles

2005-11-04 Thread Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Hi Josh Thanks very much for your reply. I should have mentioned that we will also be listing the entire references in the footer as well. I was just looking for a way to give the user immediate feedback about each reference, and thought the title may be useful. The problem with linking back an

Re: [WSG] css title styles

2005-11-04 Thread Joshua Street
I honestly don't think this is the best solution for you, especially if you're doing academic papers. For two reasons: 1) because it's impossible to get titles to "display" in a normal browser without JavaScript, and; 2) if someone prints out your page they don't get any citations at all. Well, yo

Re: [WSG] css title styles

2005-11-04 Thread Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Dustin Thanks for your link - impressive titles! Just wondered, is it possible to have them degrade when javascript is disabled, so that at least in IE WIN (for eg) the user sees the normal title? At present, if I disable javascript in FF (mac) I don't get any titles at all. Regards Sarah --

Re: [WSG] css title styles

2005-11-04 Thread Dustin Diaz
I had created a pretty nifty library for displaying titles just not too long ago called "Sweet Titles" which had became quite a hit: http://www.dustindiaz.com/sweet-titles/ They were tested to work across IE6, Moz1.0+, Opera 7+, Safari 1.3 Hope this helps, Dustin On 11/4/05, Sarah Peeke (XERT)

[WSG] css title styles

2005-11-04 Thread Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Hi all I am trying to find a web standards compliant way of styling a title for a description of references within an article. Eg: 7 If I use the above example the full reference is obviously truncated as "title" has a predetermined maximum width. I have found a css/javascript example:

RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

2005-11-04 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest document:

RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

2005-11-04 Thread Ryan Blunden
Hi Richard,   Your content is indeed usable, accessible, semantic and valid, but if I was a potential client of yours, I wouldn't be saying, 'Wow, that site looks great, I hope my site will look like that'. I'm not trying to put you down, I'm simply giving you my honest opinion.   Now maybe

Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

2005-11-04 Thread Scott Glasgow
QM Consulting Ltd wrote: I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am currently working on creating my web site. I've done some testing on IE and Firefox and validated on w3. I would appreciate any feedback, regarding standards, semantics, usability, accessibility etc. Th

Re: [WSG] RapidWeaver?

2005-11-04 Thread Jan Brasna
Looks like a neat tool. Indeed. Many friends use it, and it's pretty straightforward for someone not intersted in web tech looking only for a easy solution to publish some stuff. -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com *

Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

2005-11-04 Thread Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
Looks great m8 , only I would do a better header /logo that one is a bit fuzzy or it's supposed to be like that!? 2005/11/4, QM Consulting Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am > currently working on creating my web site. I've done some t

[WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest

2005-11-04 Thread QM Consulting Ltd
I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am currently working on creating my web site. I've done some testing on IE and Firefox and validated on w3. I would appreciate any feedback, regarding standards, semantics, usability, accessibility etc.   The page is at http:/