RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi Taco, I would suggest using a percentage to size the text in the yellow band instead of "smaller" since IE has a different idea of what smaller is compared to Firefox: p span.smaller { font-size: 80%; } I would also suggest using em sizing. The height of the yellow band would then res

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
No, its perfectly fine, its exactly what I was asking for. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 3:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread Taco, Don

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
Hi Felix thanks for the effort. A solution to the problem would be great as well ;-) Min-height doesn't work in all browsers which would be the best solution I guess. Any ideas on why the purple background while it should be white, or is that just your screenshot? -Original Message- Fr

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Taco, Don't worry, I'm not one of these nuts who blows up the text to 1200% or anything. I make my largest benchmark the "largest" setting on IE which is the about the equivalent to 2 sizes up on Firefox. No, its not the end of the world by any means, but you know what happens when you ask

Re: [WSG] The use of web standards (tables vs CSS)

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Yes! Good Stuff. It was this page that opened my eyes to CSS forevermore. http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/ *Joseph R. B. Taylor* Sites by Joe, LLC /Custom Web Design & Development/ Phone: (609) 335-3076 www.sitesbyjoe.com John Faulds wrote: I think you're talkin

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Felix Miata
[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.] On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed: > Anyways; anyone interested in a site check? > http://web-strategists.com:888 I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at all. An unset background

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
May I add that your suggestion would work. However we'd have to deal with other issues like the new white space (bottom of yellow to white gradient) that would appear from the font-increase etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R.

RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
Thanks. How large did you size the font to? We've only anticipated 1 size up, as its already a large font. You can't win in every situation ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM To:

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Taco, Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix: The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not expand with it. The content instead eventually hides as it passes the bottom of the bar. If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it are

Re: [WSG] The use of web standards (tables vs CSS)

2007-05-15 Thread John Faulds
I think you're talking about this one: http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/ On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:59:38 +1000, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The best one I ever saw was a hilarious, cartoon-infested, yet factual case made against the use of tables for layout, but for the life

Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Susie Gardner-Brown
I'm looking on a Mac in Firefox. It all seems to hold together fine. My comments are more on the design/layout side. The 'banner' area - to my mind it takes up way too much real estate. It's pretty much half the screen. And there's too much white space on the right side too I think. Another thing

Re: [WSG] The use of web standards (tables vs CSS)

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
The best one I ever saw was a hilarious, cartoon-infested, yet factual case made against the use of tables for layout, but for the life of me I have cannot remember the url. I'm hoping the mentioning of the cartoons will spark some other member's memories since I myself saw it 3-4 years ago.

[WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, even though I created a new message from scratch. Anyways; anyone interested in a site check? http://web-strategists.com:888 Thanks in advance... Taco Fleur www.pacificfox.com.au website design *

[WSG] The use of web standards (tables vs CSS)

2007-05-15 Thread Katrina
Gday, Does anyone know of any research done at any time covering the use of web standards? John Allsopp showed some research at Web Essentials in 2005. What I am specifically looking for is the use of CSS for advanced layout versus tables. Anyone know of anything? Kat **

RE: [WSG] IE6 problem - more general

2007-05-15 Thread David Hucklesby
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:36:17 -0400, Kepler Gelotte wrote: > > 1) put a border around the problem area and surrounding or enclosing blocks > using > “border: solid red 1px;” > But be aware that a border can alter the layout. (By "trapping" margins that normally "escape" for example.) My preferenc

RE: [WSG] IE6 problem - more general

2007-05-15 Thread David Hucklesby
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:36:17 -0400, Kepler Gelotte wrote: > > 1) put a border around the problem area and surrounding or enclosing blocks > using > “border: solid red 1px;” > But be aware that a border can alter the layout. (By "trapping" margins that normally "escape" for example.) My preferenc

RE: [WSG] Accessible, complex forms

2007-05-15 Thread Greg
Thanks Steve, and all, for the many helpful replies. A better example of the form I am working with is here: http://catscape.com/forms/alert.html Very madlib style, but hopefully we can convince the client that it is not in their best interest to ignore screen readers. We did make a bit of progre

Re: [WSG] IE6 problem - more general

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
There is also an abundance of information left from those who initially discovered and tried to squash the IE family rendering bugs. Any google search for IE6 box model bugs or anything of the like will return a complete education's worth of material. In the long run its all experiencing each

RE: [WSG] IE6 problem - more general

2007-05-15 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi Susie, I am not an expert by any means. I joined this group to learn from others and get some tips. I try to tackle other people's problems because it s a great way to learn and hopefully I can help someone out in the process. I have read a number of books on CSS (and other web related topic

[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2007-05-15 Thread Lynda Kelly
Thanks for your email. I'm out of the office from Wednesday 16th May and back Monday 21st. Email will be irregularly checked and I will respond to your email wjhen I can, or please call me on 0419 997 609. If you are enquiring about the Web Redevelopmnet Coordinator position (TMP455/07) plea