On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:18:32 pm James Jeffery wrote:
Good Morning!
Here is my problem. Im at college this year, preparing for University
(Hopefully Birmingham) to
study Software Engineering. At college we have a class on a Thursday called
Web Development
and the guy thats teaching the class
Hi,
If you HAVE to use tables you can still go some way in meeting
accessibility standards by compliance with guidelines:
5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when
linearized. [Priority 2]
5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for
the
I am currently out of the office.
Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or phone 02 6271 5775 for website updates and
enquiries.
--
Warrick Whatman
Web Services
Dept of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
On 10/17/07, Roberto Gorjão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you point me to some of your bookmarks or other
resources about it?
http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/accessibility.html#multimedia
and
http://www.skillsforaccess.org.uk/
-Alastair
When Outlook 2007 came out it incurred upon itself the righteous wrath
of all standardistas thanks to the stupid decision to use Word as its
HTML/CSS rendering engine.
In a few days Mac OS X Leopard will be out with much touted templates
for the mail app. Here is my question: Are these made
Although it's quite annoying but it does make some sense at some weird
level, having IE as their rendering engine with its shambled security it
was easy for a lot of spammers and hackers to inflect a lot of damage on
less experienced web users.
I actually think it was quite a good idea although
On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Keryx Web wrote:
When Outlook 2007 came out it incurred upon itself the righteous
wrath of all standardistas thanks to the stupid decision to use
Word as its HTML/CSS rendering engine.
In a few days Mac OS X Leopard will be out with much touted
templates
It would seem odd if Apple went down the same path as Microsoft,
especially since using Word to render HTML/CSS in Outlook 2007 was so
well received by the web development community! I'm sure they won't
want to be accused of following Microsoft.
Also, I have a feeling they wouldn't have
I am actually having a similar problem. I was able to skip the Web
Development class, so I didn't have to sit through it, but I am sure it
is similar to how yours is. We have a Javascript class and the HTML that
is taught in there is hideous. Also, my teacher in my Multimedia class
is wanting
Keryx Web wrote:
When Outlook 2007 came out it incurred upon itself the righteous wrath
of all standardistas thanks to the stupid decision to use Word as its
HTML/CSS rendering engine.
In a few days Mac OS X Leopard will be out with much touted templates
for the mail app. Here is my
At least in Universities (colleges - as in the English colleges, not the
American term, may be different) my experience is that lecturers have a
research area, which is why they are still in academia. Teaching is just a
necessary evil they have to go through, especially if it is not related to
Hello,
Just so you know, there's no dropdown shown in Firefox (IceWeasel) for
debian, neither for Epiphany and Konquerer doesn't seem to work with
flash.
Hope it's useful.
Regards,
Rogier Schoenmaker.
On 18/10/2007, nate hanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Michael Kear [EMAIL
I'm not a university... Just a poor schmuck trying to stay afloat in
the world of web design/coding but a website like what you are
talking about would be very very helpful. I would be willing to help
in any way I could (Without charge unless you took up too much of my
family time :))
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always thought of doing something like a web standards curriculum pack,
either in printed or online form, that we put together as a suggested
curriculum for universities to give to students
David,
I'd suggest getting in touch with somebody from the WaSP EDU
Would you want the mail templates to use standards and seperation of
concerns? Last time I looked, it was well nigh impossible to get an
email that was standards based AND rendered properly in virtually
*any* email client. Im sure they could have made the templates
standards based, in which case,
Breton Slivka wrote:
Would you want the mail templates to use standards and seperation of
concerns? Last time I looked, it was well nigh impossible to get an
email that was standards based AND rendered properly in virtually
*any* email client. Im sure they could have made the templates
and my point was: Apple isn't advertising the templates as being only
viewable in Apple mail, it's advertising them as being viewable in
*any* mail client.
This implies that they do not have seperation of concerns, because
there's no standard of support for that.
Apologies- I didn't mean my original post as a direct response to
patrick, merely a response to the thread.
On 10/23/07, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and my point was: Apple isn't advertising the templates as being only
viewable in Apple mail, it's advertising them as being viewable
Breton Slivka wrote:
and my point was: Apple isn't advertising the templates as being only
viewable in Apple mail, it's advertising them as being viewable in
*any* mail client.
This implies that they do not have seperation of concerns, because
there's no standard of support for that.
Sorry,
From: Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, had to go back and re-read the thread starter. In rushing through
my mail, I thought the question was more along the lines of will it
support our carefully crafted HTML/CSS emails, but I see now that it
specifically concerned the shipped
Al Sparber wrote:
The problem with Outlook, I believe, is
more to do with what it generates, rather than what it can read/display.
Haven't had a chance to play with the final product, but from what I
remember it is indeed a fundamental problem with its display capabilities.
From
I'm not entirely sure. The HTML/plain text announcements we send out are
standards-based with one exception - we embed the CSS in the body section.
These mails display perfectly in Outlook, OE, Windows Mail, Apple Mail, and
Thunderbird. The problem with Outlook, I believe, is more to do with
Thanks Rogier, I appreciate your help.
Since we are likely to have perhaps 1 or 2 users only using any of those
browsers, and by far the vast majority of our users are using WindowsXP with
IE6 or IE7 (remember this is not a IT related site - our customers are
tshirt retailers and advertising
Hi James,
In addition to some of the ideas given, what about showing your
lecturer some inspiring examples like CSS Zen Garden, and others?
Hopefully he can also discover designing with css and standards, and
really get into it. I had shown zen garden to a colleague few years
ago - he got hooked
On 10/22/07, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you tried outlook 2007 Lately? the way it reads/displays html has
been THE issue ever since it was released.
No. I'd assumed it displayed the same as OE6 or Windows Mail (Vista).
A.. it
On 10/19/07, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not much good for someone using a device without sound
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Or Golan
I'm guessing that a person who uses a screen reader has sound on his
device.
Not necessarily - screen reader
26 matches
Mail list logo
