RE: [WSG] Strange Table Border Rendering in everything BUT FF and IE

2009-09-26 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi, What Chris wrote will take care of the border issue. I would suggest using a structure other than a table though for guestbook entries. You could use a definition list (other people on this list may disagree and have a more semantic structure you could use). For example, the CSS: dl.guestBo

RE: [WSG] Strange Table Border Rendering in everything BUT FF and IE

2009-09-26 Thread Cole Kuryakin
Chris - That did it my friend - thanks for being my seeing eye dog! Much appreciated. Cole -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Chris Knowles Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 1:05 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject:

Re: [WSG] Strange Table Border Rendering in everything BUT FF and IE

2009-09-26 Thread Chris Knowles
Cole Kuryakin wrote: Hello All - This is the first time I've come across this issue. First, go here in either FireFox or IE7 or greater: http://www.sangat.ph/index.php?cmd=08.01.00 Both of these browsers render two guestbook entries (displayed in a table) with a thin green line set on the top

[WSG] Strange Table Border Rendering in everything BUT FF and IE

2009-09-26 Thread Cole Kuryakin
Hello All - This is the first time I've come across this issue. First, go here in either FireFox or IE7 or greater: http://www.sangat.ph/index.php?cmd=08.01.00 Both of these browsers render two guestbook entries (displayed in a table) with a thin green line set on the top border of each of the t

RE: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-26 Thread Thierry Koblentz
> Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about using: > > Have you tried using the easy clearing fix instead? > http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html ...it avoids the need for markup just for > clearing. If you stick with markup I'd suggest just using ra

[WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-26 Thread designer
Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about using: q{ clear : both; display : none; } In conjunction with: for clearing! in the body of the mark-up. (it makes it a bit more helpful for screen readers, I presume?) Anything? Any better ideas around? I did google

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :The wisdom? of using q to clear

2009-09-26 Thread Ben Buchanan
Can anyone tell me what is wrong (apart from not being semantic) about > using: Have you tried using the easy clearing fix instead? http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html ...it avoids the need for markup just for clearing. If you stick with markup I'd suggest just using rather th