Lyn,
If you need to cover IE6 then you might need to make adjustments as it
does not recognise max-width. I think the Dean Edwards JavaScript
solution helps here.
Regards,
Grant Bailey
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Ly
Hi all,
Has anyone heard of Sorenson Communications? They handle free
communications for deaf, etc. - http://www.sorensonvrs.com/svrs. From
what I can tell, it looks like a good way to try out. Did I mention it's
free???
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:l
Thanks everyone - the media queries look interesting and I will
definitely take on max-width.
--
Lyn Smith
www.westernwebdesign.com.au
Affordable website design Perth WA
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Ben Davies wrote:
I prefer liquid layouts, but I use a max-width property to control how wide
my content is allowed to get.
That's what I do, too.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Lyn Smith wrote:
Good morning
Was wondering what the latest opinions are on using
David Storey wrote:
maybe, but any is not backwards compatible so not really an option to
use any time soon, and is (AFAICT) a Mozilla only extension that is not
in any specification. As it isn't even in any spec, even if it does get
accepted by the CSS working group, it will take ages to be
On 19/08/2010 11:51, Rob Crowther wrote:
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Also worth pointing out that, to my knowledge, no AT/screen reader
currently supports it either, so this may cause some issues for these
users at present.
Similarly the native semantics of elements like header and nav don't yet
h
On 19 Aug 2010, at 11:51, Rob Crowther wrote:
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
On 19/08/2010 10:13, David Storey wrote:
So the section or article elements could be taken out of context
and
displayed elsewhere but retain their headings.
You could, but I still use the h1 to h2 inside the sections
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
On 19/08/2010 10:13, David Storey wrote:
So the section or article elements could be taken out of context and
displayed elsewhere but retain their headings.
You could, but I still use the h1 to h2 inside the sections because no
browser uses the sectioning algorithm for
I prefer liquid layouts, but I use a max-width property to control how wide
my content is allowed to get.
*Ben Davies*
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Lyn Smith wrote:
> Good morning
>
> Was wondering what the latest opinions are on using fixed width or liquid
> design in light of the ever
On 19/08/2010 10:13, David Storey wrote:
So the section or article elements could be taken out of context and
displayed elsewhere but retain their headings.
You could, but I still use the h1 to h2 inside the sections because no
browser uses the sectioning algorithm for thing like styling.
Al
On 18 Aug 2010, at 23:40, Rob Crowther wrote:
On 18/08/10 17:51, tee wrote:
This example doesn't look very semantic to me :-) Is there a tag
that can replace or substitute the use of headings?
If you properly nest your and elements then you
can use just everywhere:
Monday
Fi
11 matches
Mail list logo
