Re: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

I hesitantly suggest a good place for this discussion would be on Justin French's Interface list. http://lists.indent.com.au/mailman/listinfo/interface Cheers Chris Blown ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

RE: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

- check > whichever you'd like and the user will deal with it. Sounds good to me. Thanks! Chris. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

RE: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

l as this seems to me the > most likely option. By mailing address I meant: postal mail. And by "both options will probably be chosen an equal amount of times, as has been the case in the past" I meant: Neither option is generall

[WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

st)? Or maybe I should go to a drop down list with three options? 1. '-', 2. 'Home', 3. 'Agency' Your feedback is appreciated. Chris. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] avoid "Skip" link in search results?

ught about replacing it with ">>>" or something that won't contain keywords and won't go in the way in search results, but that probably is a killer for screen readers. Do you know a good way to place this link? -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [WSG] First Thoughts On Layout...

ll it image replacement... Guess its another half full/half empty thing. :) Cheers, - Thanks for the input! - Chris David R wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: What are your first thoughts? I think I could "pwn j00" at CS-S :) Thanks!! Oh, nice layout, but I can't see any image replacemen

RE: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS - Doesn't the HTML Matter More?

te non-spamming professional SEO efforts. So far I haven't come across any data that would convince me CSS makes a big difference with honest SEO. I'm wondering if anyone has any insight to the contrary? Thanks, Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS - Doesn't the HTML Matter More?

#x27;t have an impact on SEO significant enough to warrant redesigning a site in CSS for that reason alone. But, I'd really love to be proven wrong. Chris Rizzo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lea de Groot Sent: Friday, January 28, 200

Re: [WSG] First Thoughts On Layout...

dynamic stylesheets (diff colourss etc..) I can change the images wihtout needing to change the stylesheet. Thats why I like to keep all images that are not content related in the stylesheet. Is that not semantically correct? Thanks for your comments! - Chris Michael Cordover wrote: Hi Chris

Re: [WSG] First Thoughts On Layout...

Sorry that may be confusing. the lines: OLDER POST... OLDER POST... OLDER POST... OLDER POST... OLDER POST... are ONE post. :) just filler. counldnt be bothered www.lipsum.com it :) Paul Novitski wrote: At 04:22 PM 1/30/2005, Chris Stratford wrote: ... Also the Dates on the right side of the

[WSG] First Thoughts On Layout...

ntiate and also - it gives me the tag to position the date :) What are your first thoughts? Thanks!! -- ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.3

RE: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS - Not the real story.

n my estimation CSS isn't so important to SEO. I'd like to be proven wrong though. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Wood Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 6:34 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Sear

Re: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS

file. However, as Andrew mentioned - the biggest risk of detection is human detection and reporting. Your competitors are the threat. Whether Google acts on specific spam reports - that's the risk you can take. Feeling Lucky? :) Best regards Chris Dimmock Cogentis Search Engine Mark

[WSG] Imaginary Borders

In the following code the tr#n rules are not taking. I've looked around and have no reason for this failure. Would someone assist? "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> Table Jazz
th{ text-align: center; f

[WSG] Express Youself

top:expression(body.scrollTop + 4 + "px"); I'm unfamiliar with CSS expressions. Can someone point me to a source that has been used by list members. Also doesn't this contradict the effort of separation of code and content? CK __ "Knowing is not enough, you must

Re: [WSG] Question about use of flash in a pure css page

ollow links in which case an alternate means should be there as well or even a simple page of links. From: Chris Kennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:26 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Question about use of flash in a pure css page Hi, I'm e

RE: [WSG] browser snapshot services?

ause in about 5 > minutes I can get a good feel for what a web site looks like in just > about every configuration of browser. Which one is it that you are currently using? Chris. ** The discussion list for http://webstandards

RE: [WSG] Image alignment and text

Excellent, many thanks. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun Sent: 25 January 2005 14:28 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Image alignment and text Chris Taylor wrote: > Is there a CSS equivalent for

[WSG] Image alignment and text

vel with the bottom of the image. Example: Source: The Company Name Old-style: The Company Name = correct display New style: img{ float: left; } The Company Name = incorrect display I know it sounds stupid, but I'm a bit stumped. Any help will be gratefully received. Thanks Chris ***

Re: [WSG] content-language[is it search op?]

Hi, Would this fall under search engine optimization? If so where could I find more on the subject? On Monday, January 24, 2005, at 09:35 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote: Screen readers as well as search engines use this information. In HTML use lang, in XHTML/1.0 use lang and xml:lang, in XHTML/1.1

Re: [WSG] Question about use of flash in a pure css page

Hi, I'm exciting a "burning time", but I adore FLASH, when used correctly. In this instance spare yourself the headache and use an animated GIF solution. This will increase accessibility options and spare you time and energy. On Monday, January 24, 2005, at 07:03 AM, Sven-Eric Buschgens wrote:

[WSG] I'll Have Fries(Chips)With My CMS

Hi, I'm looking for an open source, standards compliant CMS for an existing site. The goal is taking the current design adding it to the CMS, and proceeding as seamlessly as possible. If such a thing exists one of you has knowledge. I'm asking a lot and will have fries with it. CK

Re: [WSG] The Content Generation[2nd Post]

a differently generated css depending on the number of pages? If so Chris Stratford is probably right I think (don't quote me on this though) that is valid as long as the generated file is formated properly. I doubt that IE (and several of the other older browsers) would support it. Chris

Re: [WSG] The Content Generation[2nd Post]

Hey Chris, AFAIK - you wouldnt be able to have CSS count the number of pages you have... That would require server side coding... UA Support would be minimal (in terms of PEOPLE, in terms of browsers, probably every browser except IE) - Cheers Chris Kennon wrote: Sorry for the double post, but

[WSG] The Content Generation[2nd Post]

*** "The true measure of ignorance is thinking intelligence is the solution to everything." -ck Chris Kennon Principal ckimedia (www.ckimedia.com) e-mail: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) blog: (http://thebardwire.blogspot.com/) ph

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** "The true measure of ignorance is thinking intelligence is the solution to everything." -ck

[WSG] The Content Generation

Hi All, At: http://working.ckimedia.com/questionWar/qw_account_01.htm You'll notice: Page 1 of n The goal is dynamic changes based upon the total number of pages. I hoping to use generated content, but then shuddered when thinking of UA support of this groovy CSS feature. Would someone in the kno

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

with it... Its beautiful :) Alan Trick -- ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release D

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

good. The built-in code validators look really handy - especially for bug-hunting. Thanks for the link! On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:35:31 +1100, Chris Stratford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Glad to help! It honestly is the best ever coder I have used. It is true that for Server Side Scripti

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

good!!! Love it! Bruce wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan, ... I LOVE TSW WebCoder. Built in FTP is Excellent! Built in Project Manager - with Status reports, To Do Lists, Full Project Upload Built in Server Mapping. Preview in IE and Mozilla - only for HTML coding, or if

Re: [WSG] Accessibility Features[Revision-URL Included]

Hi, Perhaps the lingo below is more succinct. cognitive disabilities / learning difficulties / etc On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 01:52 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote: On 20 Jan 2005, at 4:19 AM, Chris Kennon wrote: additional accessibility features for an audience with ... emotional disabilities

Re: [WSG] Accessibility Features

Thanks for both replies. Your jargon is accurate. Sorry if this constitutes list noise. On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: I'm sure you meant cognitive disabilities / learning difficulties / etc CK __ "Knowing is not enough, you must a

[WSG] Accessibility Features[Revision-URL Included]

p.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** "The true measure of ignorance is thinking intelligence is the solution to everything." -ck ____ Chris K

[WSG] Accessibility Features

Hi, At the following url would someone suggest additional accessibility features for an audience with varying physical and emotional disabilities. My concern is that the current features will not be as flexible as desired. CK __ "Knowing is not enough, you must app

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

ngine, to build your own UI or just functions... Wow. I could go on more and more... i LOVE TSW Webcoder! I would recommend it to ANYONE!!! The registration you do is optional, and its free no matter what... I love it. www.tsware.net Enjoy!! -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROT

RE: [WSG] Should we be thankful for IE's non-development?

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 12:20, Chris W. Parker wrote: > David R <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I don't think so. It'd just be more of the same. Some people would have > old browsers that don't work right and other people would have newer > browsers that do work

RE: [WSG] Should we be thankful for IE's non-development?

er browsers that do work right. Which browsers they are makes no difference imo. > Food for thought If you say so. Chris. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

RE: [WSG] Popups

ted (light yellow, grey border) box to the right of the field, rather than below, then when people toggle the DIV it doesn't break the flow of the form if they leave the DIV shown. Depends on the amount of text you need show, I suppose. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WSG] Class -vs- ID

Wow thanks for the great responses people! Love this list :) Cheers, solved all my problems with that question :) Paul Novitski wrote: At 06:23 PM 1/12/05, Chris Stratford wrote: I was asked for the first time yesterday, what the big difference and advantage to using an ID over a CLASS was

Re: [WSG] Class -vs- ID

BTW I know IDs are needed for LABELS and other FORM elements. :) Cheers Chris Stratford wrote: Just wondering. I was asked for the first time yesterday, what the big difference and advantage to using an ID over a CLASS was... I know why classes are good! What is the advantage of an ID over

[WSG] Class -vs- ID

unlimited, and you can assing Multiple classes to each entity too... So... Why? -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database

Re: [WSG] CSS Roundbox

ts on posting to the list & getting help ** -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Vi

Re: [WSG] Big Name Site Goes Standards

No css in Mac Firefox 1.0, but degrades beautifully!! -- Chris Gandolfo {Designer & Standards Advocate} Twelve Horses North America On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:41:14 -0500, Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I may be a little late with this, so forgive

Re: [WSG] styling ordered and unordered lists

; } .mainleft ul li { background: url(images/bullet.gif) no-repeat 6px top; } Add the parent to the style to get the desired output for UL's only. doit4Jesus, Chris Moncus chrismoncus.com AIM: HPPChrisMoncus On Jan 9, 2005, at 11:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am trying to

Re: [WSG] Aural Pleasure

Hi, Any opinions on going with a voice over approach. Perhaps Quicktime or FLASH. I know, I said the "F" word but the question is related to standards and captioning On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 08:35 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: As far as I'm aware, Emacspeak is the only browser that supports

[WSG] Aural Pleasure

Hi, I sure I could find this "Googling" but, a the list is very savvy, I've been much happier with the results. For a current project I'm authoring an aural style sheet. Would someone direct me to a good resource for aural stylesheets, and a freeware screen reader for MAC OS 10.2.8. __

RE: [WSG] Site check www.stgauderic.net/en/

OK, understood. I'll try to be a lot more specific in future. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Budd Sent: 07 January 2005 11:49 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check www.stgauderic.net/en/ Chris T

RE: [WSG] Site check www.stgauderic.net/en/

ty - other pairs of eyes are what is needed. Therefore a "please check this in Mac/PC/WebTV/whatever" is pretty valid, as far as I'm concerned. I completely agree with your second point, I'll make sure I do that in future. ta Chris -Original Message- From: [E

[WSG] Site check

eb applications - MySQL, SQL Server, Access, XML etc. If anyone knows of one I'd appreciate the info. Thanks Chris Taylor Senior Web Developer Egton.net ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://websta

Re: [WSG] ATO - shame shame shame...

Thanks for all the replies! I wasn't serious about threatening to sue. It was just an expression of rage ;) Thanks for the pointers! I will definatly let them know! Cheers! James Ellis wrote: Chris Their minimum system requirements http://pki.ato.gov.au/atocdia/MinSysReq.htm suggest that Net

[WSG] ATO - shame shame shame...

te my business registration? Can they not simply uphold web standards! Ahhh I am mad. I will call them - tell them to print it out or whatever it is. and mail it to me... Deary me... The government has failed again... :) -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neeste

Re: [WSG] Intro and first question

alidators. Thanks for watching over me. doit4Jesus, Chris Moncus chrismoncus.com AIM: HPPChrisMoncus On Jan 6, 2005, at 12:28 AM, heretic wrote: hi, I haven't spent a lot of time worrying about the disabled or impaired users of my projects because of the youth-focussed intent of t

Re: [WSG] Intro and first question

*** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ***

Fwd: [WSG] Gallery markup

of those extremes are correct". I feel the same way about tables as you do. doit4Jesus, Chris Moncus chrismoncus.com AIM: HPPChrisMoncus ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandard

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

of div's to create the same layout you have. doit4Jesus, Chris Moncus chrismoncus.com AIM: HPPChrisMoncus On Jan 4, 2005, at 12:53 PM, Collin Davis wrote: Hey everybody, I just asked for some advice on css-d, regarding gallery pages, very similar to www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php -

[WSG] Intro and first question

ator for Section 508 validation ( http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp ). I want to make sure that I am doing things correctly though. Could any of you offer your feelings toward Bobby and let me know if there are (opinion) better ones out there? Thanks a bunch! doit4J

Re: [WSG] Validation Error[solved]

Ironically the problem was with a link to a web standards site. On Monday, January 3, 2005, at 08:21 AM, Chris Kennon wrote: Me Again: The W3c CSS validator is giving me strange results. All was well yesterday, but to today I'm instructed to validate the document, which returns valid

[WSG] Validation Error

Me Again: The W3c CSS validator is giving me strange results. All was well yesterday, but to today I'm instructed to validate the document, which returns valid XHTML, but the CSS validator reports an error: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://ckimedia.com/ index.php CK _

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

Hi, Hope this does not constitute noise. But thanks for all the suggestions. The problems appear solved, even to some the dreaded QT. Happy New Year to all. C On Monday, January 3, 2005, at 03:18 AM, Iain Gardiner wrote: I was puzzled by the different link styling. I use FF 1, and when I hove

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

Hi, Problem should be resolved, thanks for the heads up. Let me know if it persist. C On Sunday, January 2, 2005, at 06:18 PM, Mary Ann wrote: Hi, Chris- I'm getting some really strange results using IE 6.0. Directly below your quick time window, there is another white (empty) window o

[WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

Hi, Just relaunched for the new year, could someone look "under the hood" for fatty tissue, bloat, redundancy the works. It all validates. http://ckimedia.com CK __ "Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do."

Re: [WSG] Funky tags or "XHTML2 Transistional"

ul? Do you know any user-agents that won't accept such tags? or misbehave with custom dtd? Maybe I should use namespace instead of creating pseudoHTML? -- ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in t

Re: [WSG] Odd IE Issue...

e the problem is exactly the image size: too small. See: http://cb2web.com/tests/gamerdb/ It uses a nav_back.gif 20x20, GIF, Web Safe colors, 81 bytes: http://cb2web.com/tests/gamerdb/media/nav_back.gif HTH Carlos http://cb2web.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Stratford" &l

Re: [WSG] Odd IE Issue...

Hey Brian, thanks for the reply - I changed the DTD... No difference at all :( Any more ideas? I will check back in a few hours. need a nap - 5am here :D Gnite! Brian Cummiskey wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: hey group, odd problem here: www.gamerdb.net using IE, that page seems to take AGES to load

[WSG] Odd IE Issue...

! -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28/12/2004 ** The

Re: [WSG] Standards CV

My thought, but this example uses tables, so I conferred with the group. On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, at 06:29 AM, Bert Doorn wrote: G'day > Does any one know of standards based resume templates.? I've > "Googled" until blurry eyed with no results. Don't know of any. However... > I would like t

[WSG] Standards CV

Hi, Does any one know of standards based resume templates.? I've "Googled" until blurry eyed with no results. I would like to create something like the following: http://www.ericd.net/ff2k2_ed/ed_resume.html but, without tables. If the "t" word is the correct method, than so be it. I'm still sh

Re: [WSG] CSS alignment issues

ound image is a ~bit~ much. 30-40k would be better and should be achievable without too much loss of quality. Regards -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com -- No virus found in this outg

Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog

EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski Sent: Saturday, 18 December 2004 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing

Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: I'd probably use a definition list: My Product Product Number: 123456 Product

[WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog

Hi, Creating a product catalog/blog for client. It will serve as a site for posting used construction equipment. In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: CK __ "Know

Re: [WSG] background loading issue[Problem Solved]

On Thursday, December 16, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Chris Kennon wrote: Hi, Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation. CK Thanks for the compliment on the background. Any other suggestions or critiq

Re: [WSG] background loading issue

Hi, Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation. CK Thanks for the compliment on the background. Any other suggestions or critique of the design is welcome off-list On Thursday, December 16, 2004, at 1

RE: [WSG] CSS rounded box generator

Good stuff, just what I needed. I have an implementation of rounded corners that doesn't work when I use it in e-newsletters and open in Outlook. Will give this a try. Thanks, Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Rincon Sa

[WSG] background loading issue

Hi, At the following url: http://working.ckimedia.com/index.php The delay when loading the background is giving me pause. Is this delay a huge usability issue, or has my quest become retentive? CK __ "Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you mu

RE: [WSG] Article length & usability

g and scrolling. When they aren't finding what they want that's when you'll lose them, and that's also when they'll form a negative opinion of your content whether it's 20 pages long or 2. Check UIE's research for some info on this topic: http://www.uie.com/ar

Re: [WSG] A standards compliant remake.

n list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** . -- ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://w

Re: [WSG] A standards compliant remake.

Hey Paul my reply is nested below. Paul Novitski wrote: Chris, Good for you, the world needs more XHTML-Strict. I do, however, have a few criticisms of your work: Your nav menu is marked up as a table. Perhaps this is simply a matter of personal perspective, but I consider a one-dimensional

[WSG] A standards compliant remake.

so I dont mind. Just thought I would let you all see another part of the web being transformed! I have checked most pages and they all validate pretty much! Tell me what you think! Cheers! -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neeste

[WSG] Float Issue

Hi, the following layout url works locally in firefox, mozilla, ie 5 mac even. When uploaded to a server, the right column, secondary, is atop main. The isp is not to blame, the site was tested out of the subdomain so the scripts are not broken. This is not a .php question, the question is wit

Re: [WSG] IE Error :S

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stratford Sent: Thursday, 9 December 2004 9:23 AM To: WSG Subject: [WSG] IE Error :S Hey WSG, Just have a problem with IE and this page: http://inspiro.neester.com/index.html I cant get it to show on my version of

Re: [WSG] IE Error :S

than 699px the layout works .. iif it is over You get the screen shot your client sent you However this is only on that page the rest of the site is OK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stratford Sent: Thursday, 9 December 2004 9:

Re: [WSG] IE Error :S

your client sent you However this is only on that page the rest of the site is OK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stratford Sent: Thursday, 9 December 2004 9:23 AM To: WSG Subject: [WSG] IE Error :S Hey WSG, Just have a problem with I

[WSG] IE Error :S

cript and thinks its an error... I didn't think this was meant to happen - doesnt the wc3 validator realise that it is only javascript, not xhtml?? Cheers group! -- ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.n

Re: [WSG] alt or title...

hen the 'longdesc' attribute can be used, containing the URL of the document containing the information, however browser support is poor. Chris ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mai

Re: [WSG] A quick breakdown of some code today

the value has been updated the CSS is not applied. [1] I wonder if switching stylesheets would force an update? Regards Chris Blown [1] http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/attribute_selectors.html ** The discussion list for http://w

Re: [WSG] a quick target question

sgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****** -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com **

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

Wow thanks guys. Good responses. I wasn't sure if anyone would use it - with the way IE has spread - I assumed that everyone would be IE unless they chose something else... Thanks again! Chris Stratford wrote: Just a question... Why is there such an emphasis on NN4? Who actually still uses

[WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

Evolt Cheers! -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hin

Re: [WSG] New Standards Compliant Website

Ahh yeah? I might give that a shot then :) Thanks! But yeah, the problem wasn't with the font size, if you read my original message it is actually a problem with my CSS not working properly. Cheers Michael Wilson wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: Hey Mordechai, Yeah I know I did that - I want

Re: [WSG] New Standards Compliant Website

- anyone have any ideas? Or should I just chuck this on www.experts-exchange.com? Cheers! Mordechai Peller wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: http://inspiro.neester.com/ Click on ABOUT. In IE the content panel seems to overlap the whole nav panel too... I checked out http://inspiro.neester.com/about

Re: [WSG] New Standards Compliant Website

Sorry by the way i havnt finished styling the site yet. So no need to comment on the contact page and the others :) Cheers Chris Stratford wrote: Hey WSG, Just need a little assistance here. http://inspiro.neester.com/ Click on ABOUT. In IE the content panel seems to overlap the whole nav panel

[WSG] New Standards Compliant Website

Hey WSG, Just need a little assistance here. http://inspiro.neester.com/ Click on ABOUT. In IE the content panel seems to overlap the whole nav panel too... I know its to do with the image floating right. But how can such a thing be fixed? Cheers -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL

[WSG] When Is It CDATA?

Hi, In the following why is it appropriate to classify the import rule as CDATA? /* */ ___ "Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do." ---Bruce Lee *

Re: [WSG] colgroup alignment issue

Mike, Comes a bit late as I'm sure you've move on, but I think you would still find this interesting. http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1070385285&count=1 Cheers, Chris. On 12/11/2004, at 3:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have encountered alignment issues between our target browsers. Th

Re: [WSG] Print Style Sheet Inconsistencies

Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: 1) Printing IGNORES all "background" attributes... This is understandable - but I didn't realise this until just now... So my LI background elements weren't printing (or showing in Print Preview which is how I check what it

Re: [WSG] Why does firefox tooltip only "TITLE" attribute and not ALT?

USE OR DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION. --- -- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Print Style Sheet Inconsistencies

BTW the navigation will be hidden from the Print, it is just so I can navaigate around the pages at the moment. Cheers! Chris Stratford wrote: Hey List, I am trying to develop a website at the moment and I want to have a great stylesheet for printing as well as a great layout sheet... http

[WSG] Print Style Sheet Inconsistencies

good! I think that is the way it should be? Or is there a reason why Moz has done this? Cheers List! ---- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neester.com ** The discussion list for http://websta

Re: [WSG] New music site barring non IE browsers

I think its important to actually note that it is a ninemsn content partner - not ninemsn itself - whose site is causing the problem. Note the redirection http://sib1.od2.com Its a branded content partner site. Chris On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:50:26 -0700, Shane Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >