vinod chandnani wrote:
On 2/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The message you sent requires that you verify that you
are a real live human being and not a spam source.
To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave
the subject line intact.
The heade
Hi Sharon :)
What took you so long ... ? :)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
Roger that, command. Over :))
Felix Miata wrote:
I think if you digest http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5869 and
http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6153 you'll find represented the
behavior you've described. Linux simply does not have the same fonts as
doze, unless you've imported doz
As an added note to Linux fonts:
It may be useful for some of you guys to know that on some major Linux
distros ( Fedora, Debian, Slackware) in all browsers available through
the KDE or Gnome fonts appear to be rendered slightly bigger than on
WIN. Up to 5 % bigger.
Even if you "import" fonts
Wow ... Nick , you got so far ...
Quote from The Web Standards Project :
**
Kevin Lawver, AOL's representative to the CSS Working Group, is making a
plea to the design community to give the Working Group feedback on the CSS3 Borders and Backgrounds module
.
I think accessibility is starting to be as much about accommodating
*any* browsing situation as much as accommodating disabilities.
I think it was from the very beginning. Accomodating dissabilities is where work was needed fast and results were needed badly.
In time accessibility will mean and
It does not matter who is it you aimed for. I CAN ACCESS IT. And i
don't mean me Mugur, but me, another multi-national, with headquarters
in another part of the world with local to ISP broadband connection but
no broadband outside the country, witch happen to be common practice in
some countries ar
what feels seems different in this instance is that the
image is in the background so the image is not even necessary to see the
page and load the page.
Why put it there then ?
If it's not needed then make it go away ! And voila ... you just turned a "broadband only" into a "everyone everywhere
True, but how do you keep your site local on the web?
And what if my bussiness in Romania on dial-up finds your services in
Australia (aimed at local "broadbanders") so attractive that wants to
do business with you? Hey, maybe this way i can get my business on the
broadband "level" but here in Roma
Hi Sunny,
I'll jump right to it and I will tell you NO you are not wrong to hope
that. Most sites can and should scale down to 800x600 resolution
without to much effort for their makers. Bad news is ... they wont
change easily, it's too convenient to work at large resolution: you
wont have to divi
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good
reason for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
1. Over 90% percent of the world population do not live there and do
not have dial-up access or other types of network access of
ueladvance.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mugur Padurean
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 3:48 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
Sorry, but quoting
Microsoft page as good design example is not a
Sorry, but quoting Microsoft page as good design example is not a good ideea. No web page that big IS a good ideea.
Maybe this will help you:
http://www.stopdesign.com/articles/throwing_tables/
The purpose of the article it's slightly different but it's a very good motivator for small size web pa
re he will share with the list when
it is ready. He deserves a round of applause for taking some time out of his
day to help a fellow list member and eventually the entire community.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mugur Padurean
Sent:
Ted, now, why did you give IE another brake ?
It's always gonna need another one and there's nothing we can do about
that for now. Problem is every time we "hack" for IE we buy it a little
more time. And frankly ... that's a BAD idea.
We found the best "grammar" (standards) for the web and we made
Posted with the list administrator guidance and aproval.
Hi,
I wish to bring to your atention an upcoming series of events to take
place all around the world on 3rd of November under the generic name
World Usability Day. The goal of these events is to raise awareness
of the importance of eas
bout nine months later, and at that
point 0 (zero) people had actually downloaded it. Not one.
Zilch.
I respect everyones right to be different, but there comes a point
when kowtowing to the vocal minority is just not fiscally responsible.
Anyway, I did not mean to hijack your list. This is my
... for the government? Me to. At least that's where i go every morning :) Exept i work FOR THE PEOPLE.
Let me point that this is MY opinion :
THE ONLY entity, whom may have a form or another of web presence, that
does NOT have the "option" to choose who to SERVE ... IS the government.
Before we
Tony Crockford wrote:
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still
seeing the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
He
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing
the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
Here you go:
http://www.yahoo.com/?r=1096530966
I have no clue if there is some selection going on there b
Nick Lo wrote:
I agree it appears that way now but I think it's a little too
easy/early to suggest it is and will end up that way. In that respect
it'll be interesting to watch it develop.
On a site of this massive scale I'd be very surprised if there are not
a bunch of pretty screwed on heads
Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
I'm almost ready to add content to this page http://mouseriders.dk/
but I still have one problem I just can't figure out. Is it possible
to create a style(s) that will show one of the tabs white (you are
here kind of thing)... like I do in the sidenav ?
I just can't see it
3px 50%;}
and give the a's: {margin-left: 10px;}
Again I hope I understood corectly what you were trying to do !
Mugur Padurean
P.S. Pardon my english language skills !
Hugh Todd wrote:
OK,
I've thrown in the towel. No one piped up with solutions to the last
couple of issues, so I've
/printyourway/
<http://www.alistapart.com/articles/printyourway/>
and
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/(this article is a
"classic" ;)
Hope it helpes,
Mugur Padurean
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hi guys,
Anyone know where I can find a good, easy to follow online tutorial
25 matches
Mail list logo
