> Lukasz Grabun
> Tab indices (indexes?) are helpful for those who use keyboards to
> navigate webpages (for example me - I browse using elinks, mostly).
However it's useless to define tabindex if the natural tab order of a page
already makes sense.
Patrick
Patri
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:26:54 +0100, Kim Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accesskeys:
[..snip accesskeys list..]
> I'm not sure this is right at all. (I mean use accesskeys to navigate
> the site with) Should accesskeys not only be used for "important"
> links... like accesskeys page, sitemap etc
Hi,
These articles help sort out some of the confusion.
(http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/12/29/i_do_not_use/
index.php?cssfile=/css/proton-sm.css)
(http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyconflicts/37)
C
On Wednesday, February 16, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Kim Kruse wrote:
S
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:45, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> Kim Kruse wrote:
> > Should accesskeys not only be used for "important"
> > links... like accesskeys page, sitemap etc?
>
> I'd say yes to that one. Otherwise you end up with a jungle of
> accesskeys, which are then hard to memorise and will
Kim Kruse wrote:
Should accesskeys not only be used for "important"
links... like accesskeys page, sitemap etc?
I'd say yes to that one. Otherwise you end up with a jungle of
accesskeys, which are then hard to memorise and will most likely
conflict (if you move beyond numbers into letters) with
Hi,
I've built myself this site http://republicana.dk (almost done) and I'm
a little confused about accesskeys and tab index. What I've so far is
this...
Accesskeys:
* Skip to content (alt s)
* Index.php (alt 1)
* Sitemap (alt 3)
* Search (alt 4)
* Conditions (alt 5)
* A tab li
