Hello all!
I re-did my website (http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/) a while back in an effort to update its look and improve the quality of the coding behind it.
Right now, it looks perfect, just like I want it to. But, I need
to improve/clean up the XHTML coding behind it - eg, properly structu
Does anyone have any ideas or thoughts on my question?
--ZacharyOn 1/30/06, Hopkins Programming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all!
I re-did my website (http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/) a while back in an effort to update its look and improve the quality of the coding behind it.
Right now,
Hi Zachary,
I just have noticed that your web site does not meet the requirements
for WAI AA and AAA.
But it is really beautiful.
Best,
John
Home: http://www.webnauts.net
Redesign in process: http://www.webnauts.net/redesign/
Hopkins Programming wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas or thou
It meets -A and -AAA. This re-coding process will allow me to add
text back into my
Do you know if its better to arrange the actual HTML code on the page
such that the content all comes first, and all links are at the bottom
of the page?
== Example
Site
Page
Section One
Bla
Hopkins Programming said:
> [is it] better that the content all comes first?
Mark Pilgrim [1], Sarah Horton (of Web Style Guide Fame, in her latest
book) and others say it is.
Roger Hudson, WSG's very own Russ Weakley, and Lisa Miller say that it isn't.
[1]:
http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_
If there are any of you all who use screen readers or text-only browsers on a regular basis, what is your opinion?
- Do you expect the navigation or content to come first?
- Which would you prefer to come first?
- If the content comes first, should there be a "Skip to Navigation" link at the top?
On 3 Feb 2006, at 4:43 AM, Hopkins Programming wrote:
If there are any of you all who use screen readers or text-only
browsers on a regular basis, what is your opinion?
- Do you expect the navigation or content to come first?
Roger and Russ answer this one in their report. In summary, the cu
I personally would expect the page to appear as any typical printed
document should.
Page Title (your element)
Table of Contents (your nav list)
Content (content)
My 2 cents.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terrence Wood wrote:
O
On 2 Feb 2006, at 21:33, Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
I personally would expect the page to appear as any typical printed
document should.
Page Title (your element)
Table of Contents (your nav list)
Content (content)
That is a good ethos when designing for monitor-based applications.
Joseph R. B. Taylor said:
> I personally would expect the page to appear as any typical printed
> document should.
>
> Page Title (your element)
> Table of Contents (your nav list)
> Content (content)
A typical printed document doesn't have a table of contents on every page.
It's usally appears
10 matches
Mail list logo