Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-20 Thread Jeremy S. (WSG)
Hey there. I find that when I do so, even with my site, it simply breaks my site design. It's when I click on the EditCSS button that such happens. It doesn't seem to happen with many other sites, just mine. Would that be a problem with my CSS code? Matt Andrews wrote: ... and, if you're

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-20 Thread Jeremy S. (WSG)
Hey there. I find that when I do so, even with my site, it simply breaks my site design. It's when I click on the EditCSS button that such happens. It doesn't seem to happen with many other sites, just mine. Would that be a problem with my CSS code? Matt Andrews wrote: ... and, if you're

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-20 Thread Jeremy S. (WSG)
I apologize for the repeat message. My mistake. :-( Jeremy S. (WSG) wrote: Hey there. I find that when I do so, even with my site, it simply breaks my site design. It's when I click on the EditCSS button that such happens. It doesn't seem to happen with many other sites, just mine.

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-20 Thread Glenn
It'still working for me with 1.0PR Glenn Tom Livingston wrote: Current version of Web Dev extention is incompatible with FF 1.0PR... Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-17 Thread Tom Livingston
Current version of Web Dev extention is incompatible with FF 1.0PR... Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com Get FireFox http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=0t=1 Matt Andrews wrote: ... and, if you're using the Web Developer extension, Firefox has a huge advantage over

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-17 Thread Felix Miata
Tom Livingston wrote: Current version of Web Dev extention is incompatible with FF 1.0PR... Rest assured that that is a temporary condition consequent to the youth of that release. -- Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.Psalm 33:12 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-17 Thread Tom Livingston
[happy dance] Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com Get FireFox http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=0t=1 Dan Webb wrote: It tells you that but it lies. Ive got it working on 1.0PR by just reinstalling it after installing 1.0PR. Quoting Tom Livingston [EMAIL

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-17 Thread Amit Karmakar
- From: Chris Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2004 14:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Moz vs. FF Reinstalling Web Dev after installing 1.0 PR worked for me too. I found this true of a handful of extensions. Most of the more popular extensions seemed

Re: [WSG] Moz vs. FF

2004-09-17 Thread Leslie Riggs
Am I glad to hear that. I test-drove XStandard, but my browser of choice is FF 0.9. I didn't like being forced to use IE, so that lasted about 10 minutes and I uninstalled XStandard. Otherwise it's a great tool. It's nice to know there will be an Active X-free version out soon. Leslie