Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-15 Thread Tony Crockford
On 15 Sep 2010, at 03:20, Luke Hoggett wrote: Check out Google Font Directory http://code.google.com/webfonts TypeKit http://typekit.com/ which can be used through Google Font Directory and Cufón, and @font-face with packs from font squirrel: Cufón: http://github.com/sorccu/cufon/wiki/About

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-15 Thread Joseph Ortenzi
I vote @font-face worth=2cents / On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Tony Crockford to...@boldfish.co.ukwrote: On 15 Sep 2010, at 03:20, Luke Hoggett wrote: Check out - Google Font Directory http://code.google.com/webfonts - TypeKit http://typekit.com/ which can be used through Google

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-15 Thread Rob Crowther
Luke Hoggett wrote: In some cases client may have to pay (TypeKit) but they do have at least have the option of picking a font that is close to what they need. Also check out FontDeck: http://fontdeck.com/ You can server the fonts for free to a limited number of IPs without buying a

[WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Lyn Smith
I have worked it out - it is because it is a Heading - h1. If I make it a p, it becomes as he wants. I imagine an H1 is more important to a search engine than a p? :-) -- Lyn Smith www.westernwebdesign.com.au Affordable website design Perth WA

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Stuart Foulstone
But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants. That's why many graphic designers make poor Web Designers - they can't get their head round the flexibility that needs to be designed into a Website. On Tue,

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Adam Martin
I would put it back as an h1 and use css like so: h1 { font-weight: normal; } On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Stuart Foulstone stu...@bigeasyweb.co.ukwrote: But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants.

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Lyn Smith
But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants. Yes. My client has just asked me to use some weird font I've never heard of! I will try and dissuade him. That's why many graphic designers make poor Web

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Lyn Smith
I would put it back as an h1 and use css like so: h1 { font-weight: normal; } Thanks Adam - that works! -- Lyn Smith www.westernwebdesign.com.au Affordable website design Perth WA *** List Guidelines:

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Luke Hoggett
Typography on the web has come a long way, and even more so recently. Check out * Google Font Directory http://code.google.com/webfonts * TypeKit http://typekit.com/ which can be used through Google Font Directory In some cases client may have to pay (TypeKit) but they do have at

Re: [WSG] RE: Fonts in MS Publisher compared to onlineRe:

2010-09-14 Thread Lyn Smith
Thanks Luke - very interesting developments! Check out * Google Font Directory http://code.google.com/webfonts * TypeKit http://typekit.com/ which can be used through Google Font Directory -- Lyn Smith www.westernwebdesign.com.au Affordable website design Perth WA