Re: [WSG] XHTML v HTML (also a question about GoLive)

2004-05-20 Thread Michael Donnermeyer
>From my limited experience with GoLive CS (the latest version), it does an OK job of outputting XHTML/compliant code. Of course that only a few hours of use, before I blew it off my drive.Dreamweaver MX & MX2004 are much better suited for that IMO. I split my time almost 50/50 between hand c

Re: [WSG] XHTML v HTML (also a question about GoLive)

2004-05-18 Thread Hugh Todd
Mordechai, I think the XHTML/HTML issue has been canvassed by more knowledgeable members in the past on this list, with some advocating for the use of HTML 4.01 for reasons you may like to search in the archives. (Look particularly for posts by Peter Firminger.) That said, you are probably more

Re: [WSG] XHTML v HTML (also a question about GoLive)

2004-05-18 Thread Neerav
No idea about Adobe Golive but Dreamweaver MX 2004 ver 7.01 can be set to output XHTML compliant code. -- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development & IT consultancy Mordechai Peller wrote: A potential client asked me: How does a xhtml site differ from an html site and will I be able to

[WSG] XHTML v HTML (also a question about GoLive)

2004-05-18 Thread Mordechai Peller
A potential client asked me: How does a xhtml site differ from an html site and will I be able to make modifications myself using a program such as Adobe Golive which creates html pages? It's the second half of the question with which I'm having a problem since I have no experience with GoLi