Looks like
it's in the HTML 3.0 draft:
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/deflists.html
You're right - no mention of it in 4.01, although both IE and FF
support it. I wonder why they got rid of it.
-Nate
Nathan Rutman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Corporate Communications Designer
Solvepoint Corporati
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joseph Lindsay
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] more definition list lovin' - the lh tag.
Upon further research, it appears that the element was
lists
self-contained.
I'm sure it was deprecated. It seems to good to be true.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joseph Lindsay
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] more definition li
Upon further research, it appears that the element was in older
HTML specs. I found it in the HTML 3 DTD. but it is not in more
recent versions.
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/html3.dtd
On 7/7/05, Joseph Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ted, can you give me the URL where you found that?
Hi Ted, can you give me the URL where you found that? As far as I can
tell from the HTML 4.01 DTD (i'm happy to me corrected) the
element must contain 1 or mor or elements, and can't contain
any other elements (although the can have inline elements and
can have block and inline elements). I c
Just when I thought I couldn't love the definition list any more, I looked
at the w3.org definition of the definition list and came across this:
The opening list tag must be . It is followed by an optional list header
(caption) and then by term names () and definitions (). For
example:
List Head
