Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

And the below would result in a single link to a page that says 'the sky is blue'. I don't see how everyone would agree with everything in a "Links" list. As mentioned before, If you disagree with an article and/or it's author, let the author know, not Mr. Weakley. On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:09

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

age- > From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Russ Weakley > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading > (22/12/09) > > ...A

RE: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Sent: Thursday, 24 December 2009 5:09 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) From: "Erickson, Kevin (DOE)" You didn't give up did you Russ??? There is always hope if we choose to see it right? Please keep sending your

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

From: "Erickson, Kevin (DOE)" You didn't give up did you Russ??? There is always hope if we choose to see it right? Please keep sending your links and don't let the "bad" apples spoil the whole bunch :) - I think Russ needs to thoroughly read each of the article

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

> > -Original Message- > From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org > [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org > ] > On Behalf Of Russ Weakley > Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light r

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

..@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Russ Weakley Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) ...Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope. Russ On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 P

RE: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

up.org] On Behalf Of Russ Weakley Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:55 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) ...Ahhh... I give up... there is no hope. Russ On 22/12/2009, at 10:46 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: >> Will HT

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

- Original Message - From: "Rimantas Liubertas" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) Regards, Rimantas -- http://ri

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

> Guys, > Shouldn't this be a separate thread? Maybe there shouldn't be any thread in the first place. On the other hand, my complaint was about "Some links". Anyhow, I won't bother you anymore. My apologies to anyone offended. Have a great holidays and less "Out of office" replies next year. Be

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Rimantas: HTML5 guys keep saying that HTML5 supports XML syntax, hence us XHTML freaks can use XHTML5 without having to complain about anything. Maybe have a discussion with our friend Bruce Lawson who will essentially tell you the same thing. I think you are being a bit too harsh on our friend R

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Guys, Shouldn't this be a separate thread? Thx Pete On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: > > It obviously worked in provoking discussion. > > Where do you see discussion there? Does "keep them coming" count as one? > I am all for "them coming" but I'd like some QA applied t

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

> I reckon HTML5 Nazis I thought I was being rude there… > should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5 > and XHTML are interchangeable terms. How so? HTML5 has XML serialization, but that does not make HTML5 and XHTML "interchangeable" in any way. > Comments like this other guy made j

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

> It obviously worked in provoking discussion. Where do you see discussion there? Does "keep them coming" count as one? I am all for "them coming" but I'd like some QA applied to them too. > (And I reserve the right to keep my opinion about the original commenter to > myself ;-) Don't be shy. I

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

I reckon HTML5 Nazis should chill our regarding the XHTML debates as HTML5 and XHTML are interchangeable terms. Comments like this other guy made just add unnecessary negativity to the whole thing. Russ is a legend in his own right and no one should even attempt to cyber bully him. ;-) On Tue, Dec

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

+1 for my weekly dose of "Some links for light reading"! Jeremy Cabral mobile: 0410 319 212

 // skype: jeremycabral On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Jacques Halans wrote: > Keep em coming Russ! > They are links for light reading after all, not gospel. > It obviously worked in provoking

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Keep em coming Russ! They are links for light reading after all, not gospel. It obviously worked in provoking discussion. (And I reserve the right to keep my opinion about the original commenter to myself ;-) JJ Halans "Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

22/2009 09:01 AM >> Please respond to >> wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >> >> To >> wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >> cc >> Subject >> Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) >> >> >> >> >> Hi Rimantas

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

> Sent by: li...@webstandardsgroup.org > > 12/22/2009 09:01 AM > Please respond to > wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > > To > wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > cc > Subject > Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09) > > > > > Hi Rimanta

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

UNIFI Information Technology agerasimc...@unioncentral.com (513) 595 -2391 Russ Weakley Sent by: li...@webstandardsgroup.org 12/22/2009 09:01 AM Please respond to wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To wsg@webstandardsgroup.org cc Subject Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Hi Rimantas Why did I post this link? Because the article has an interesting take on HTML5. This does mean that I agree or disagree with the article. I hoped that the article would lead to discussion and debate. I had also hoped that any discussion or debate would be conducted in a respec

Re: [WSG] [WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (22/12/09)

Rimantas, How can you be so sure yourself about what you just posted regarding HTML5 vs. XHTML? Thanks, Jason http://flexewebs.com/semantix On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: > > Will HTML5 make the Web even more invalid? > >