Handled!
(and look! I didn't curse even once! ;))
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Core Group Member
On 2 Mar 2007 21:13:18 -0800, RBaggs wrote:
> Subject: Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [ZONEALARM CHALLENGE]
> to: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Lea de Groot wrote:
sime wrote:
However, I'm told that my code is therefore not XHTML compliant
because of my use of uppercase. So who then is HTML4 relevant to?
I don't really understand the question.
As written, the css shown will work under HTML dtds (and XHTML
transitional? I'm not sure a
sime wrote:
I used the following as the foundation of my current approach to style
sheets.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/sample.html
If I am understanding it correctly, thats not meant for page
developers/designers to base from, its meant for browser developers to
start from.
You can expect
Paul Novitski wrote:
Wouldn't activating the link in a screen-reader simply move the cursor
(reading point) from the link to the beginning of the page?
It's been a while since I've sat down with a screen reader, but from my
limited experience with JAWS the link would be announced as a "same p
At 03:34 PM 2/28/2006, Hill, Tim wrote:
> Back to Top
Is there an issue with using this for screenreaders?
Wouldn't they activate this link and nothing would happen?
Does this work effectively across browsers to scroll the page to the top
though? I've found it works on firefox, ie, opera on PC
On 12/21/05, Barrie North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Drew,
Well, I tried min-width 300px and then removed
the min-width completely and it still didn't work :/
Barrie
Only way I was able to eliminate the scroll is to make the headerimg a
background image
On 12/21/05, Barrie North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Drew,
Well, I tried min-width 300px and then removed
the min-width completely and it still didn't work :/
Barrie
That's what I get for not trying the solution before profoundly pronouncing it.
This one is
Hey Drew,
Well, I tried min-width 300px and then removed
the min-width completely and it still didn’t work :/
Barrie
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew Trusz
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005
2:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject
2005/10/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Original message sent on the Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:29:49 1000 by
> wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> > **
> > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> >
> > See http://webstandardsgro
>> On 10/15/05, Stefan wrote:
> How can I make the Table fill the full width of the column in FireFox and
> IE 6?
same thing happened to me with that type of layout.
I added the following rules to the tables and it sorted it for me:
table {width:100%;float:left}
cheers,
pete
***
Read below!
Please DO NOT send these to the list. You were smart enough to subscribe,
take some responsibility and unsubscribe yourself. We're kinda busy here
right now.
Peter
> To revert to a standard subscription, please log into the website -
> http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/ - and selec
Josh Rose wrote:
>
> What I'm trying to do is have the accesskey underlined, it works fine
> in Firefox and Opera (wayhey), but in IE 6 the a:first-letter works
> fine, but a:hover doesn't at all (it does without a:first-letter
> though) and in Netscape 7 the a:first-letter doesn't work at all
> (
>> Hope that made sense,
nup. youre definately going to have to show us an example. if you havent got a live example to show, make a really simple example by stripping out everything else and just include some html & css within your post. help us to help you! :)
On 7/21/05, Josh Rose <[EMAIL P
Title: Message
Hmm...wonderful non-sequitur...
Oh...I
like bread by the way.
Patrick
-Original Message-From: Laurie Keith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 12 November 2004
12:04To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] RE:
digest for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
have
Adobe Cre
Hi,
just do this. Send an email from your subscribed account to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "set mode digest wsg" (no quotes) as
the BODY (not subject) and it will be so. And you will just receive one
email every few days or so containing every mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still keep getting th
> On 23/05/2004, at 11:37 PM, noa wrote:
> Does 'CSS-Discuss' consider validation a theoretical issue?
While I dislike all this "meta" discussion - in my opinion, if you don't like
the format of the list, there are plenty of other resources available in
alternative formats, so you'd be better inve
On 23/05/2004, at 11:37 PM, noa wrote:
Does 'CSS-Discuss' consider validation a theoretical issue?
I'm not sure what you're asking. The netizens of CSS-D, just like any
other technical mailing list, can only really help you if you help
yourself. Yes, they can provide both practical and theoreti
Does 'CSS-Discuss' consider validation a theoretical issue?
Justin French wrote:
On 23/05/2004, at 10:23 PM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
Personally, I have no particular
interest in discussing theoretical issues regarding web standards; if
someone can steer me to a list better suited to dealing with
On 23/05/2004, at 10:23 PM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
Personally, I have no particular
interest in discussing theoretical issues regarding web standards; if
someone can steer me to a list better suited to dealing with the more
practical issues of using CSS, I would be grateful.
see http://www.CSS-D
Andrew Krespanis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Personally, I joined this list in the hope of reading and participating in
> more theoretical discussion. It's not that I don't want to help people, i
> do, but I already do enough of that at codingforums.com...
While I can perfectly understand this,
Brian Grimmer posted --
>Personally, though I prefer the idea of a forum, the biggest issue I
have
>with an e-mail list is the twits that do not know how to set up an
>auto-responder properly.
I also prefer the idea of a forum instead of such a high volume list. I
don't have time to check this li
Personally, though I prefer the idea of a forum, the biggest issue I have
with an e-mail list is the twits that do not know how to set up an
auto-responder properly.
If ANYTHING is a waste of bandwidth, that is. I am sure the list could care
a less if your off for a few days tinkering for whatever
I'm opposed to forking the list.
I second j.neen's suggestion for a tread-based forum.
This list is threaded..
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg%40webstandardsgroup.org/
That is how my mail reader displays it it too. Maybe you could try mail
software which threads.
Also, I prefer an RSS feed of th
On 21/05/2004, at 12:36 PM, jneen wrote:
my five cents worth
I would prefer to see a more typical thread based web forum where I
just sign in and can read at my leisure. Any posts made by me should
list my login name and I think that only member's should be able to
post. I also find the number o
my five cents worth
I would prefer to see a more typical thread based web forum where I just sign in and
can read at my leisure. Any posts made by me should list my login name and I think
that only member's should be able to post. I also find the number of emails I am
getting harder to digest a
Webmaster wrote:
I did not want my membership revoked, I just can't weed through 100+ emails
every day.
This list is busy, but not that busy. The key is threading. I've been on
this list for almost a month now, and in that month I've received
roughly 40 new email and less than 10 new threads. So
I agree. I actually tried to unsubscribe from the list so I could just view
the list archive at my leisure. But if you unsubscribe the page reads:
_
|_| Yes. Remove me from the mailing list and delete my membership.
I did not want my membership revoked, I just can't weed through 100+ emails
ever
27 matches
Mail list logo
