Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-04 Thread David R
The Bo$$ wrote: If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600. My guess is that he tested it at 800x600 res, which makes perfect sense. And 800x600 resolution can be useful for detail work in Photoshop or

RE: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-03 Thread Iain Gardiner
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wong Chin Shin Sent: 03 January 2005 04:36 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds Tested on Firefox 1.0, Windows XP SP2. 1) Anti-war site heading is really close to the last line of the previous paragraph. Looks more like a signature. 2

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-03 Thread Bruce
The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for movie, tells size... nice. I use windows, Firefox with an 800x600 resolution and there is a scroll bar across the bottom which I can almost get rid of using the very small text. Positives happening :-) I am liking the group,

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-03 Thread The Bo$$
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600. On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for movie, tells size...

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-03 Thread Bruce
I know, but it is amazing how many people browse at that still, and I kinda like it... maybe I will lol Bruce The Bo$$ wrote: If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600. On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500,

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-02 Thread Bruce
I am sure it is fine, I like the layout and background, I declined having to install quicktime, perhaps that should be a viewers choice afterwards? Rather than required before page loads...the first thing I got was the popup to install it, which always irritates mealso I am on a 56k modem,

RE: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-02 Thread Mary Ann
Hi, Chris- I'm getting some really strange results using IE 6.0. Directly below your quick time window, there is another white (empty) window of the same size. The remainder of your text starts directly below that and is, therefore, pushed below the bottom of your background graphic. M.A.

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-02 Thread Chris Kennon
Hi, Problem should be resolved, thanks for the heads up. Let me know if it persist. C On Sunday, January 2, 2005, at 06:18 PM, Mary Ann wrote: Hi, Chris- I'm getting some really strange results using IE 6.0. Directly below your quick time window, there is another white (empty) window of the

RE: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-02 Thread Wong Chin Shin
Tested on Firefox 1.0, Windows XP SP2. 1) Anti-war site heading is really close to the last line of the previous paragraph. Looks more like a signature. 2) Link to A List Apart looks different from others. Intentional? 3) Hover event color change in Edification and Validation is REALLY slight.

Re: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds

2005-01-02 Thread Bruce
I was starting to think I was in the wrong place, a tad ignored, after all, I took the time to go there and gave my opinion, glad to see someone at least agrees. Not a negative, it is just many have a slow modem, and like I said before, a lot will close a site before bothering to download