Re: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On 2 Dec 2004, at 9:19 PM, Phil Baines wrote: web standards complaint sites Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant? N ___ Omnivision. Websight. http://www.omnivision.com.au/ ** The discussion list

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Phil Baines
web standards complaint sites Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant? N HAha! Good catch Obviously it should have been web standards compliant sites. Thanks for helping me laugh at myself :) Phil -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Cook, Graham R
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Checking web standards complaint sites Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant? N HAha! Good catch Obviously it should have been web standards compliant sites. Thanks for helping me laugh at myself :) Phil

Re: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Rob Mientjes
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:19:19 -, Phil Baines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, This is my first message to the list, but I have been watching for a little while. Weldon to the Administrators for maintaining a good list, and to the posters for keeping the list so busy! snip /

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Phil Baines
@ Rob: The first things that caught my attention are the file sizes of the images. Not everybody's on broadband yet... Some of the Cardi Grain ones yeah, but I dont think that the other two sites have any really big images. Some of them will probably go under some high optimisation before

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Phil Baines
@ Graham Cook: * Place link to Home at left, not right, of menu bar Good usability point. Thanks. I take it you were referring to the Scaffolding site, I have changed this, and I am making the logo a link to the home page also (something I normally always do, but forgot in this case). *

Re: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Rob Mientjes
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:13:16 -, Phil Baines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Clean code, except for two silly things I checked in Teifi's site: a name=content class=skipTonbsp;/a The attribute name should be replaced by id, and the link may have some content to keep in logical for screen

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Phil Baines
@Rob Hey, I'm just a n00b. Hey, we are all n00bs in some way, learning something new every day. I will look into this, and see what comes out of it. You might be right about the spec, but sometimes we have to trade off between the spec, and what browsers actually support. Thanks for your

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Rowena Padel
Phil Baines : http://dev.netring.co.uk/teifiscaffolding/ http://dev.netring.co.uk/cardi%5Fgrain/ http://dev.netring.co.uk/lloydmotors/ _ Hi Phil Nice layouts. I'm seeing problems in two of the sites in Opera 7.4. In the Teifi Scaffolding I see the word Navigation in caps

RE: [WSG] Site Checking

2004-12-02 Thread Phil Baines
When checking the sites in opera, I noticed that the Lloyd Motors one isn't displaying properally in Opera. The background image for the body doesnt display on the bottom as required. This is the CSS I have: background:#F2F5F9 url(images/bodyBg.png) repeat-x bottom; Any ideas how to fix