On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Mario Theodorou wrote:
Try using font-size:0.8em this is a better method for font-size
accessibility
Which will be too small for me (and many other people) to read comfortably.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.o
Hi Nick,
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Fitzsimons"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] font size - was [ Accessible websites]
Different fonts have different sized letter forms; _of course_ they
look different. Look up x-height
<http://en.
Try using font-size:0.8em this is a better method for font-size
accessibility
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of designer
Sent: 07 July 2009 12:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] font size - was [ Accessibl
2009/7/7 designer :
> I've been reading (and trying to learn from) the discussions on
> accessibility and particularly font size. I have never had any success at
> using ways other than pixels. When I read:
>
> http://informationarchitects.jp/100e2r/?v=4
>
> I agreed with the author that the text s
Hi,
check the link you will find the soln :)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Safari-Font-Rendering-Scares-Windows-Users-57815.shtml
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/12.html
regards,
- hariharan k -
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> > I've been reading (and t
> I've been reading (and trying to learn from) the discussions on
> accessibility and particularly font size. I have never had any success at
> using ways other than pixels.
<…>
> So, whilst the idea of text at 100% sounds reasonable, I always get a mixed
> bag of results. I feel as a designer(sugg
