://www.w3.org/International/
Publication blog:
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick
> Sent: 15 March 2005 19:20
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] style att
Thanks,
Sounds like a good idea, plus it saves me the headache of validating
their css.
Alan Trick
Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
Hi Alan,
Both and are "bad". How about
BBtags this:
[important]
[highlight]
[note]
[misc]
then you use this markup:
..
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
Ala
Hi Alan,
Both and are "bad". How about
BBtags this:
[important]
[highlight]
[note]
[misc]
then you use this markup:
..
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
Alan Trick wrote:
> I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
> semes to make more sense to have somethin
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:49:00 -, Alan Trick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a instead of a and
have a whole bunch of unnecesary styles, and if I want to allow
so
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a instead of a and
have a whole bunch of unnecesary styles, and if I want to allow
something like [span style='color:#123'], that is quite difficult to do
via class
Hi Alan,
>>I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated
>>in xhtml 1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be
>>obolete?
It depends on what you mean by "obolete". Deprecated means that it's part of
the spec but the construct is outdated and its use is strongly discouraged. The
n
Alan Trick wrote:
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated in xhtml
1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be obolete? If so, what
do they expect us to do for inline styles because it doesn't always
make sense to have everything in an external style sheet.
Well, unless they
