Hi Bill,
>> At the moment of saving a new configuration after having changed the
>> audio input from default to USB headphone set.
>>
>> Ubuntu 12.04 32 bit
>>> --
>> wsjtx
>Version of wsjtx please?
V 1.1 r 3496
>Only guessing here, have you set your sound card default sample r
Hi Bill,
That may be a question for Joe, but with AC_CHECK I looked for the
headers first, then .so -o -e then .a. So if the .so is available it
should link against it. At least that is my understanding of how it's
put together / should work.
I'm in Windows at the moment, but If I recall, when I
On 08/05/2014 00:43, David wrote:
> Hi Joe,Bill and All
Hi David,
>
> Im now disturbing the ether with some RF
> because of the small size backyard (20m x 10m) i couldnt put up my hexbeam
> or even a dipole.searched the net and found a S9V18 vertical that
> would do
> the job and was a small pr
Sounds great, David!
-- Joe, K1JT
On 5/7/2014 7:43 PM, David wrote:
> Hi Joe,Bill and All
>
> Im now disturbing the ether with some RF
> because of the small size backyard (20m x 10m) i couldnt put up my hexbeam
> or even a dipole.searched the net and found a S9V18 vertical that
> wou
On 07/05/2014 22:48, ki7mt wrote:
Hi Greg,
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I did a bit of searching on RPM-FIND. for libfftwf3.a looks like you need:
>
> For Static
> fftw-static
I stand corrected on the availability of a static fftw library.
I am still wondering why anyone would want to statically link a library
On 07/05/2014 22:28, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Hi Chuck,
> Turns out there is no libfftw3f.a on my system.
> I downloaded the current fftw3 source from fftw.org,
> compiled and installed it. Still no libfftw3f.a anywhere
> on my system except for one in the wspr source
> directory (??)
libfftwf
Hi Joe,Bill and All
Im now disturbing the ether with some RF
because of the small size backyard (20m x 10m) i couldnt put up my hexbeam
or even a dipole.searched the net and found a S9V18 vertical that
would do
the job and was a small price
I knew it would be a compromise for an antenna but b
I added it in Makefile.
On 05/07/2014 03:13 PM, ki7mt wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Ok, well we know you can build it. I added some changes this morning.
> Lets, and see what the results are. Should only take a minute or two.
>
> cd ./wspr
> make clean
> make distclean
> svn update
> ./autogen.sh <== ma
Hi Chuck,
Ok, well we know you can build it. I added some changes this morning.
Lets, and see what the results are. Should only take a minute or two.
cd ./wspr
make clean
make distclean
svn update
./autogen.sh <== make need to chown $USER:$USER && chmod +x ./autogen.sh
make
python -O wspt.py
T
I installed fftw-static to get fftw3f.a
Then I added -lfftw3f to the LIBS and compiled.
These incantations have resulted in a wspr 4103
that
On 05/07/2014 02:48 PM, ki7mt wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I did a bit of searching on RPM-FIND. for libfftwf3.a looks like you need:
>
> For Static
> fftw-stati
Hi Chuck,
I did a bit of searching on RPM-FIND. for libfftwf3.a looks like you need:
For Static
fftw-static
For Dev Headers:
fftw3-devel
Share Libs
fftw-libs-single-3.3.4-1
But I'm not an RPM expert.
For me on Ubuntu 14.04, it was one package for all of them libfftw3-dev
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On
Turns out there is no libfftw3f.a on my system.
I downloaded the current fftw3 source from fftw.org,
compiled and installed it. Still no libfftw3f.a anywhere
on my system except for one in the wspr source
directory (??)
On 05/07/2014 01:16 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Chuck, Greg --
>
>>> just now I i
Hi Joe,
Yes, understand. I added that check to configure.ac .. configure should
fail if headers aren't found or the lib can't execute execute properly:
AC_CHECK_LIB([fftw3f], [sfftw_destroy_plan_], [HAS_FFTW3_L=1],
[HAS_FFTW3_L=0])
He should get an FFTW ... OK on a sucessful configure.
It fi
Chuck, Greg --
>> just now I installed python3-tkinter and now that compliant is gone.
Yes. This is required, as stated before.
>> Now "python3 wspr.py" stops complaining that
>>
>> [caf@omen3 wspr]$ python3 wspr.py
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "wspr.py", line 45, in
>>
Hi Chuck,
see below
On 05/07/2014 01:43 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 08:17 AM, ki7mt wrote:
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> A few questions, see below.
>>
>> On 05/07/2014 03:01 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>>> I tried the new wspr under both 64 bit Fedora 20 and 64 bit Fedora Rawhide
On 05/07/2014 08:17 AM, ki7mt wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> A few questions, see below.
>
> On 05/07/2014 03:01 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
>> I tried the new wspr under both 64 bit Fedora 20 and 64 bit Fedora Rawhide.
> When you say the new wspr, do you mean you checked out the latest from SVN?
yes
Hi Chuck,
A few questions, see below.
On 05/07/2014 03:01 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> I tried the new wspr under both 64 bit Fedora 20 and 64 bit Fedora Rawhide.
When you say the new wspr, do you mean you checked out the latest from SVN?
>
> I have been running wspr 3829 for some time, c
On 07/05/2014 07:25, Pino Zollo wrote:
Hi Pino,
> At the moment of saving a new configuration after having changed the
> audio input from default to USB headphone set.
>
> Ubuntu 12.04 32 bit
> --
> wsjtx
Version of wsjtx please?
> ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1018:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable
I tried the new wspr under both 64 bit Fedora 20 and 64 bit Fedora Rawhide.
I have been running wspr 3829 for some time, compiling it
repeatedly with each new version of Rawhide without issues.
I am stumped on the new version of wspr.
Depending on how I call it, wspr fails because it can not
find
19 matches
Mail list logo
