And to add two threads to this testingstill no improvement so sticking
with 1 thread on the OMP seems to be the thing to do.
And I've been running the jt9_omp now since yesterday with no problems
noted. What's the plan for this? An option to enable?
M1,M2
1.50,1.03 Jt9 -w 2
1.44,1.01
I thought -w 3 might be worth revisiting since the speedups seem to have
stabilized some...I only tested this with "-m 1" since prior testing showed
no improvement for more threads. I am going to test -m 2 -w 3 and will show
those results later.
On two machines -- one Windows 7 desktop several ye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
I'll do that today and see how it works out. Thanks!
Ross
KD0VHN
On 2/6/2015 12:38 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 18:30, Ross Sanders wrote:
>> Hello,
> Hi Ross,
>>
>> Having a problem with KVASD constantly crashing, or being una
On 06/02/2015 18:30, Ross Sanders wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Ross,
>
> Having a problem with KVASD constantly crashing, or being unable to
> decode transmissions beyond one or two, in which case it'll throw up a
> "KVASD is busy" message if there are more transmissions to decode.
>
> Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS x6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Having a problem with KVASD constantly crashing, or being unable to
decode transmissions beyond one or two, in which case it'll throw up a
"KVASD is busy" message if there are more transmissions to decode.
Problem signature:
Problem Event Na
On 06/02/2015 16:49, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Bill --
Hi Joe,
>
> Revision 4949 hasn't fixed it, yet, although it's now a bit harder to
> reproduce the problem. I find that it I double-click alternately on a
> JT9 signal and a JT65 signal, pretty soon it will hang.
OK, but I think that is another issue
Bill --
Revision 4949 hasn't fixed it, yet, although it's now a bit harder to
reproduce the problem. I find that it I double-click alternately on a
JT9 signal and a JT65 signal, pretty soon it will hang.
As for my grumbles about CMake, etc... pay no attention, hi. I do
know, usually, what n
On 06/02/2015 16:18, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
> One helpful sign: I can reproduce the
> "switched-modes-double-click-decode" problem in Linux, as well as Windows.
I have a fix, it is a threading issue. Will commit shortly.
>
> It's much easier for me to diagnose such problems in Linux, where a
> s
Michael Black writes:
Hi Mike:
>
> Doesn't the "Flatten" box do that for you?
No. "Flatten" further distorts the spectrum display rather than
smoothing
the baseline.
>
> I'm looking here right now at a JT9 signal with side lobes that has an
11dB
> peak and -25dB on the side lobe
One helpful sign: I can reproduce the
"switched-modes-double-click-decode" problem in Linux, as well as Windows.
It's much easier for me to diagnose such problems in Linux, where a
simple Makefile-driven recompile of jt9_omp takes 1.8 seconds. In
Windows, a CMake-driven build takes several min
Hi Bill,
I saw that behavior yesterday, too, but had trouble reproducing it. I
will give it some attention now.
-- Joe
On 2/6/2015 10:52 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 05/02/2015 23:01, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Hi all,
> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Sorry to say, I seem to have broken something in the w
On 05/02/2015 23:01, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Joe,
>
> Sorry to say, I seem to have broken something in the way double-click
> decodes are done. I'll look into it tomorrow.
Your latest commit has fixed this but I see another issue. In v1.3 and
v1.4.0-rc2 attempting to dual mode decode with
12 matches
Mail list logo
