Could you send me a randomly picked up subset of the JTDX exclusive decodes
together with a time stamp? I have a live data feed from pskreporter for a
visualization project and I can verify wether other stations received it and
what they were running.
I've got mostly solid data for the last
Title: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X vs JTDX
and there is another issue with those decoded 'very weak signals' on the HF bands!
In Europe we have different countries, different mentality, some like it soft,
some like it 'hot'...
The huge 'CALL3.TXT' file is an essential part of the hinted decode of
Michael,
have you looked at the hint code that was added ... its a bunch of 'if
then' decision trees, which can explain the 'extra processing'.
As a user, I'd rather trust the 13K WSJT-X decodes to be REAL, rather
than the 15K of which 2 or 3K may be spurious.
Neil
KN3ILZ
On 6/11/2017 3:
I see why people are claiming JTDX decodes better.
I ran a 24-hour test side-by-side on the same audio stream and got the
following numbers.
JTDX average dB on matched QSOs is ~1dB better (not a big deal)
JTDX got 15,690 decodesWSJTX got 13,692 decodes
JTDX got 2,144 decodes that WSJT-X did notW
