Hi!
During last week I made one more extension to cqrlog's wsjt-x
connection. Friday's ES opening was perfect place to test it with 92
qsos that about 90% of them were made by answering to CQ.
As we know wsjt-x stops TX if answer to CQ is done at same frequency as
CQ calling and answer does
Hello Joe,
the occurrence of the false pop up for "contest mode" has seemed to
decrease for us down here in VK but it still catches some out and leads to
confusion and cursing. For those of us hams NOT in the USA and never
likely to want contest mode ever, could a simple tick box be included on
Pino --
On 6/1/2018 3:40 PM, Pino Zollo ZP4KFX wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am Pino, ZP4KFX.
I am not a DX expedition but it seems that I am the only ZP4 station
remained.
Years ago the where moretwo went SK... the others seem QRT.
If I appear on 20m or 17m a huge pile-up grows over me...and I
Hi everybody,
I am Pino, ZP4KFX.
I am not a DX expedition but it seems that I am the only ZP4 station
remained.
Years ago the where moretwo went SK... the others seem QRT.
If I appear on 20m or 17m a huge pile-up grows over me...and I am not a
contester and neither
a good DX operator... i
Hello,
I would connect my cluster software DX FIGHTER CLUSTER to WSJT-X, trough
a UDP connection.
But in VB.net and PYTHON i get only uncomprensible string.
I try 'localhost' port 2237. JT allert work well.
Where i wrong?
73
---
Hi all,
Not sure if this is something new, but I was calling CQ on 20m this
morning, and had the Call 1st box checked. I was on for about an hour
or so, and removed the Call 1st as I wanted to select the next station
since I was getting a few replies at the same time.
In any case, I uncheck
Hi Pat,
understood, but we have to draw the line somewhere on expected skills of
the user otherwise we would have to start each piece of documentation
with a huge list of references about setting up and operating an Amateur
Radio station. We set the bar fairly high because we are a small team
On 6/1/2018 6:15 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
As you might expect, we are busy looking at more comprehensive ways of
addressing the problem. The solution is not one for v1.9.1, however.
Thanks
Jim K9YC
--
Check out the vibr
The existing manual requires some thinking and digital experience (setting
levels etc...).
The problem I see coming is that the voice operator who wants the QSO with
"xxx"
(and is afraid that the weather will stop the expedition before the big-guns
are done
so he can get through) will remembe
On 01/06/2018 17:40, patrick hamel wrote:
This manual is probably a job for someone younger and better than
myself, but you are all developing code and it probably won't get done
unless I do "something".
Hi Pat,
what's wrong with the existing manual?
Quoted from the WSJT-X release announceme
I was an early adopter because JT65 allowed me to ham and not disturb my sick
wife.
The learning curve took a while, even after a long time on 600 meters with WSPR
experience.
I have not written a line of code since the company said I was too old 12 years
ago,
so I am now just a "user" who kn
Is it possible that the software could interpret receipt of a grid in place of
an expected signal report as an automatic switch to contest mode? That way the
receiving station doesn’t need to even know that the transmitter is using one
mode or the other.
Added benefit - if signals are such tha
Jim --
On 5/31/2018 4:47 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 5/31/2018 9:43 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Of course this could be done in FT8. But as I emphasized in a
previous email, we did not want to use a different solution for FT8
and MSK144.
As currently implemented, MSK144 has no spare bits.
Two though
Hello,
I have been using WSJT-X with FT8 for the last few months.
My system: Ubuntu MATE 16.04
A routine update caused a new version of WSJT-X to be installed.
The present version: WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc4
After this update a few days ago my first usage tonight showed a problem:
Apparently no si
14 matches
Mail list logo
