On 14/06/2018 22:25, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Barry,
we are moving to git, part of that involved reorganizing the svn repo.
Each project now has a top level directory in the repo with a trunk
and optionally a branches and tags directory alongside. So the
wsjtx-superbuild location has moved
Maybe your antivirus is getting in the way?Can you put an exclusion on the
directory?
de Mike W9MDBH
On Thursday, June 14, 2018, 4:54:13 PM CDT, Steve Sacco NN4X
wrote:
Same as always. Please let me know how I can assist.
Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X
You are invited to our Facebook group - FT8 for Field Day
https://www.facebook.com/groups/163063787693492/
We have 2 work-around solutions for doing FT8 on Field Day. One is a very
clever one that uses N1MM plus a script.
Our final test before FD is this Saturday at 1800z for 30 minutes on
Same as always. Please let me know how I can assist.
Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e
C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\WSJT-X -t
C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X
At line 81
of file
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:05 PM Barry Jackson wrote:
> On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote:
>
> > the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the
> > extended outage, reorganization is complete.
> >
>
> Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses
>
On 14/06/2018 21:38, Barry Jackson wrote:
On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote:
the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the
extended outage, reorganization is complete.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses
On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote:
the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the
extended outage, reorganization is complete.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses
wsjtx-superbuild and it does not find the script:
svn:
It seems to me that changing the operation of the “tab 1” message list might go
a long way towards accommodating the non-standard messaging wanted for Field
Day and other situations - and probably enhance current functionality. I would
suggest:
1) Allow a “free form” field to be inserted in
Hi Gene,
On 6/14/2018 9:54 AM, Gene Marsh wrote:
Joe (and the group),
Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several
months ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim
is the president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an
Joe (and the group),
Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several months
ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim is the
president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an article/doc/link/etc
for the mod? Or, a different forum?
73 de
Hi Ria,
Thanks for reporting on your experience using FT8 as a Rover during the
VHF QSO Party. We will be working on better solutions for the "/R" and
contest-mode issues.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 6/13/2018 11:35 PM, rjai...@gmail.com wrote:
This weekend I was part of rover team K2EZ/R.
It's already been done many different ways.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/14/2018 1:14 AM, DM2CYN wrote:
Michele,
interesting topic! Go on and let us know your results!
Vy 73 Leo
Am 13.06.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Michele
Joe,
I would hope that the enhanced 75-bit message structure will allow for the
Tx3 and Tx4 messages to contain all of the 0-9 and A-Z characters. This would
allow FT8 to be used in a number of other operating events & contests such as
State QSO parties and Field Day exercises.
Can we
Joe (and the group),
Jim Wilson, AC8NT, suggested a Field Day mod was bandied about several months
ago. Jim says he knows you and worked on some code for you. Jim is the
president of our local club (PCARS). Can you suggest an article/doc/link/etc
for the mod? Or, a different forum?
73 de
Seems to me that the original post was that of an internet troll.
Probably best to move on.
73
Conrad PA5Y
On 2018-06-14 09:55, Jim Brown wrote:
I must say that I'm getting awfully tired of the bashing of a fine
operating mode that requires a lot more operator sophistication than
those who
I must say that I'm getting awfully tired of the bashing of a fine
operating mode that requires a lot more operator sophistication than
those who have never used it assume. I'm a pretty good CW op (starting
in 1955), but I also concentrate on station building, understanding
propagation, and
Hi all
Already been done by sv5dkl his station has worked in excess of 13,500
stations since last July he has posted a howto on youtube.
I cannot see the point in a robot station or understand how people cannot
click for themselves and feel the need for autoseq on which makes the whole
> There would be no challenge for you as an OPERATOR!
There’s no real challenge in double clicking callsigns.
> Robot FT8 is not Ham Radio
Arguably, from the operator’s perspective, experimentation in software is more
in the spirit of ham radio than double clicking callsigns.
Just my view.
On
Michele,
interesting topic! Go on and let us know your results!
Vy 73 Leo
Am 13.06.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Michele via wsjt-devel:
Hello,
I'm an OM from Italy.
Can I develop a software that allows make QSO automatically?
73
19 matches
Mail list logo
