Bill --
empirical tests using multiple simulated FT8 signals
>
Do you have software for us civilians that can do that? Create .wav files
with multiple FT8 signals with controllable frequencies and strengths, I
mean. SimJT doesn't, according to documentation
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k
Hi Bill,
.
Many thanks for the detailed answer. Absolutely agree with you on the need to
increase FT8 band capacity, we will try to implement FT8 GFSK support too when
it is done in WSJT-X.
.
73,
Igor UA3DJY
Re: [wsjt-devel] GFSK for FT8?
From: Bill Somerville - 2019-04-27 13:37:57
On 27/04
On 27/04/2019 17:09, Dr. Alwin Güdesen wrote:
Hi All,
... I wonder whether uploaded FT4-QSOs to LoTW will be accepted by the
ARRL when installation packages
for WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5 become available on April 29th. In other words:
Will the new DATA submode FT4 be
eligible for DXCC purposes by then
Hi All,
... I wonder whether uploaded FT4-QSOs to LoTW will be accepted by the ARRL when
installation packages
for WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5 become available on April 29th. In other words: Will the new DATA
submode FT4 be
eligible for DXCC purposes by then?
Most logbook users will want to log FT4-QSOs
On 27/04/2019 13:01, Игорь Ч via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello Joe,
.
Is there any possible losses, e.g. sensitivity or compatibility, at
pushing FT8 in software towards GFSK modulation?
.
73,
Igor UA3DJY
Hi Igor,
the simple answer is yes. But only related to compatibility, for example
if we elec
Hello Joe,
.
Is there any possible losses, e.g. sensitivity or compatibility, at pushing FT8
in software towards GFSK modulation?
.
73,
Igor UA3DJY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
