Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Peter Sumner
Joe, in WSJT-X on the settings menu, you have to put WSJT-X into contest mode as the others have hinted at... Only THEN will it auto log, the Auto log for normal use was disabled a few releases back to stop people creating QSO robots. Regards, Peter vk5pj On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:56 AM Joe w

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Hi Neil, I did not imply that they should. I simply stated the obvious that the Auto Log feature works only in a contest. As to how they might accomplish that, I would leave it to the developers. 73, Sam W2JDB   -Original Message- From: Neil Zampella To: wsjt-devel Sent: Tue, Jul 23, 20

[wsjt-devel] ISCAT Not Working In 2.1.0

2019-07-23 Thread Jim Brown
The grid expedition to DL79 and DL99 two weeks ago found that ISCAT would make QSOs under marginal conditions that wouldn't support FT8 or MSK144. Last night, AG6EE and I tried it over a path of 40 miles or so, and were unable to decode either Mode A or Mode B, even though the signal was clearl

Re: [wsjt-devel] No WSJT-X "ALL.TXT" decodes with N1MM?

2019-07-23 Thread Bill Somerville
On 23/07/2019 21:09, Rich Zwirko - K1HTV wrote: During this past weekend's CQWW VHF contest I operating on 6 Meters, primarily using the FT8 and FT4 modes. Of the 312 QSOs made, 212 of them were on FT8 and 79 on FT4. The other 21 QSOs were on the analog modes. I ran WSJT-X with N1MM and all w

[wsjt-devel] No WSJT-X "ALL.TXT" decodes with N1MM?

2019-07-23 Thread Rich Zwirko - K1HTV
During this past weekend's CQWW VHF contest I operating on 6 Meters, primarily using the FT8 and FT4 modes. Of the 312 QSOs made, 212 of them were on FT8 and 79 on FT4. The other 21 QSOs were on the analog modes. I ran WSJT-X with N1MM and all worked fine. The best FT4 DX to the east during the co

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Neil Zampella
I seriously doubt that the developers will change the way the logging system works.    It has been stated often enough that they do not want to create an automatic QSO machine, and so they want some human intervention to start a QSO, call CQ, and log a contact. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/23/2019 12:04 PM

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

2019-07-23 Thread Fred Price
I have a great idea on how to solve this problem. Why don't one of you sit down at your computer and write some code so this isn't a problem any more. After all it is open source as long as you follow the GNU GPL. I'm sure the dev group has better things to do then just because some want a SNR

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

2019-07-23 Thread Rich Zwirko - K1HTV
Laurie, Your idea of switching from the contest configuration to the one used for normal operation looks good on paper, but there is a problem. When the normal configuration comes up, the callsign of the station you were working is replaced by the call of the last station you worked with the normal

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Joe
Thanks Sam Joe WB9SBD On 7/23/2019 10:57 AM, Sam W2JDB wrote: HI Joe, I understand you conundrum but the auto logging feature is only active when that Spcl Oper checkbox is checked. That is what I tried to explain in my first message. Maybe the developers can add some other options. 73, Sam

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
HI Joe, I understand you conundrum but the auto logging feature is only active when that Spcl Oper checkbox is checked. That is what I tried to explain in my first message. Maybe the developers can add some other options. 73, Sam W2JDB   -Original Message- From: Joe To: Sam W2JDB ; wsjt-

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Joe
OK, But if I check that box, None of the choices it wants you also pick fits true? or what should I chose? to fool it? the exchange is the typical any day FT exchange 4 digit grid square, what would work? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Did you have the Spcl Oper box checked ? Sam W2JDB   -Original Message- From: Joe To: WSJT software development Cc: Sam W2JDB Sent: Tue, Jul 23, 2019 11:22 am Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging But? It is a contest, it is fully integrated with N1MM+ the WWDIGI contest https://ww-dig

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

2019-07-23 Thread Joe
But? It is a contest, it is fully integrated with N1MM+ the WWDIGI contest https://ww-digi.com/rules.htm The paired software is telling me who is a New mult, who is good to work, who is a dupe  etc. N1MM+ is even what opens WSJT-X, so what part of being in a contest am I missing? Joe WB9SBD

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

2019-07-23 Thread Palle Preben-Hansen, OZ1RH
There is an ongoing debate on confusion when a contester and a non contester try to work each other as one or both does not receive the expected data, that may be a report, a serial number, a full grid, state or get a warning flag about 'VHF contest mode'. As I suggested during my flight on a DXpe

Re: [wsjt-devel] Contest confusion

2019-07-23 Thread Roeland Jansen
I have thee configs with different codec/civ/etc (9700, 7300, 7851) myself and all three required a restart of wsjtx. If that is the same as with this... I would not thing the option would be too good to use. On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 05:22 Rich Zwirko - K1HTV, wrote: > Your idea of switching from t