Re: [wsjt-devel] Problems building on MacOS X 11.1 Intel

2021-07-17 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 18/07/2021 03:31, Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi there, I’m running into an error in the fortran portion of the WSJT-X project on MacOS X.   I’m reaching out to see if anyone has bumped into this: [ 17%] Built target record_time_signal [ 17%] *Automatic MOC for target fort_qt* [ 17

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Adrian via wsjt-devel
Thankyou, however I see, to be compatible with install instructions ; git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx src ,however I adapted to suit, I note that linquist requires qttools5-dev installed. Also    ;   cmake --build . --target install should really show ;   sudo cmake --build . --

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible feature request, time skew notification?

2021-07-17 Thread Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel
Every ham with a modern HF rig has a simple, accurate, and reliable way of getting the correct time. It's called WWV. If you can't hear WWV on at least one frequency you either need to do some more antenna work or the bands are in such bad shape you won't make many contacts anyway. Other parts

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible feature request, time skew notification?

2021-07-17 Thread Wolfgang K. Meister via wsjt-devel
Yes, there is a utility http://www.dxshell.com/jtsync.html that willdo exactly what you want. It syncs either via ntp or if there is nonetwork it is using a very clever methode do average received FT8/FT4signals to set your clock. Extreme late or early transmissions intime are ignored.73sWolfgang O

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible feature request, time skew notification?

2021-07-17 Thread Pearce Kieser via wsjt-devel
Like you said the issue here is getting an accurate reference time. Two options you might consider: 1. If you’re internet connected you could get time a trusted over network time protocol (NTP) 2. In outdoor setting (sounds like it is more applicable) you can get a trusted time from a GPS recei

[wsjt-devel] Problems building on MacOS X 11.1 Intel

2021-07-17 Thread Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel
Hi there, I’m running into an error in the fortran portion of the WSJT-X project on MacOS X. I’m reaching out to see if anyone has bumped into this: [ 17%] Built target record_time_signal [ 17%] Automatic MOC for target fort_qt [ 17%] Built target fort_qt_autogen [ 17%] Built target fort_qt [

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Kari Sillanmäki via wsjt-devel
OM, On 18.7.2021 6.30, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: What is the correct url for the git repo please ? vk4tux Try this: git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx wsjt-wsjtx IMHO it's much easier to use the source tarball from the  WSJT-X page https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/ws

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Adrian via wsjt-devel
What is the correct url for the git repo please ? vk4tux On 18/7/21 12:20 pm, Paul Bramscher via wsjt-devel wrote: I don't download from the git repo, though, and instead just get the current source .tgz from SourceForge. Have you had success with that method? 73, KD0KZE / Paul

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Paul Bramscher via wsjt-devel
I have been compiling WSJT-X for a number of years now on Debian (including Buster 10 now), occasionally with help from G4WJS, and have had no troubles in a long while. I don't download from the git repo, though, and instead just get the current source .tgz from SourceForge. Have you had success

[wsjt-devel] Possible feature request, time skew notification?

2021-07-17 Thread Paul Bramscher via wsjt-devel
I was at a monthly outdoor ham event in the greater St. Paul/Minneapolis area that's drawn loyal attendance the past few years. An operator setup FT8 outdoors, but had some issues getting it to decode. We could tell it was getting sound from his port, but there was no decoding. He was using Wind

Re: [wsjt-devel] rc3 behaving the same

2021-07-17 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Hi Joe, Is that a new requirement for the tx offset to move to the calling station tx offset ?As far as I know, that is not the behavior in 2.4 and earlier versions. 73,  Sam W2JDB -Original Message- From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel To: WSJT software development Cc: Joe Taylor Sent: S

Re: [wsjt-devel] rc3 behaving the same

2021-07-17 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
If you want your Tx frequency to change to that of the CQ caller, hold CTRL down when you double-click on the CQ message. On 7/17/2021 4:44 PM, Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel wrote: I just noticed that rc3 is behaving the same as rc1 did with respect to double clicking a station calling CQ TEST in

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.5.0 rc1 problems found

2021-07-17 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Hi Rory, WSJT and WSJT-X are weak-signal communication tools. They have never attempted to be like mature contesting software. It's easy to do what you need, but it's not automatic. If you're using WSJT-X by itself in a contest, wthout N1MM+ or other contesting software, start the contest

[wsjt-devel] rc3 behaving the same

2021-07-17 Thread Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel
I just noticed that rc3 is behaving the same as rc1 did with respect to double clicking a station calling CQ TEST in NA VHF mode. The transmit frequency stays where you last were and the receive frequency moves to the station calling CQ TEST. Hold TX Freq is not checked therefore shouldn't both t

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.5.0 rc1 problems found

2021-07-17 Thread Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel
This one is going to be difficult to explain Joe but I am going to give it a try. I am now running rc3 and working the CQ WW VHF contest in NA VHF mode. I am finding a lot of stations working the contest that I have worked before non-contest. For the sake of the contest I would like to work then

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.5.0 rc1 problems found

2021-07-17 Thread Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel
Sorry Joe, I guess I need to get caught up! I really like Q65 Joe... pure genius! 73, Rory, K5CKS On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:40 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Rory -- > > Release candidates for WSJT-X 2.5.0 are now up to -rc3, released two > weeks ago.

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Kari Sillanmäki via wsjt-devel
Hi Claude, This may not comfort you much, but just for fun and giggles I installed Debian Buster onto a virtual machine and then cloned Hamlib and WSJT-X from git. Compiled, and got a working WSJT-X. So *something* may not be right in your system. I have no idea what that could be though, so

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.5.0 rc1 problems found

2021-07-17 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Rory -- Release candidates for WSJT-X 2.5.0 are now up to -rc3, released two weeks ago. RC4 will be out soon. When involved in beta testing, please keep up with new releases. We are always especially interested in comments on the latest one. -- 73, Joe, K1JT On 7/17/2021 3:20 PM,

[wsjt-devel] 2.5.0 rc1 problems found

2021-07-17 Thread Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel
I found two new issues with 2.5.0 rc1 today. 1. In MSK144 mode when you double click on a station heard the timeslot is changed to the same as the calling station. 2. In NA VHF Contest mode double clicking on a station calling CQ TEST in the Band Activity window moves only the RX Frequency not both

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Adrian via wsjt-devel
I recommend adding sid to source & update, I found it very beneficial with wsjtx on Debian 10 here. # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.6.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20200926-10:17]/ buster main # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.6.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20

Re: [wsjt-devel] My problems while compiling from the source

2021-07-17 Thread Claude Frantz via wsjt-devel
On 7/16/21 6:38 PM, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Bill and all, I'm not sure why you are getting that error. The libthread_db library is used by debuggers to access thread information so I am surprised it is being referenced. Is this a debug configuration build? I don't have set e

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x v2.5.0-rc3

2021-07-17 Thread Alan via wsjt-devel
Guesswork, but it looks like the two streams are conflicting somehow? Maybe if the USB hubs are external and not independently powered try using direct connections? Otherwise you could try running the 890 using RS232 and separate audio connections? No idea on debugging software, search engi

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x v2.5.0-rc3

2021-07-17 Thread Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
This is a showstopper; the USB hubs are set so that power saving is not active. Does anybody have any ideas? Regards Conrad PA5Y From: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel Sent: 17 July 2021 07:52 To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Conrad PA5Y Subject: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x v2.5.0-rc3 Good mornin

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc3 RST_RCVD logging issue

2021-07-17 Thread jan0--- via wsjt-devel
Jim, Exactly. The openings may last 30-60 minutes, in general, but the path between any two specific stations is typically short-lived. The geographic footprint may have a radius of 100 km or so at either end, and moves with time. The reason I'm continuing this seemingly off-topic discussion

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc3 RST_RCVD logging issue

2021-07-17 Thread Jim Brown via wsjt-devel
On 7/17/2021 2:59 AM, jan0--- via wsjt-devel wrote: It is characteristic of this propagation phenomenon between NA and AS on 6m that the opening between any given pair of stations is brief:  One or two minutes is not uncommon. That depends a LOT on which part of the US and which DX country. He

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc3 RST_RCVD logging issue

2021-07-17 Thread jan0--- via wsjt-devel
It is characteristic of this propagation phenomenon between NA and AS on 6m that the opening between any given pair of stations is brief: One or two minutes is not uncommon. For this reason, stations on both sides, NA and AS, typically start QSOs by calling with the Tx2 message, thereby increa

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc3 RST_RCVD logging issue

2021-07-17 Thread Jim Brown via wsjt-devel
On 7/16/2021 11:33 PM, Derek Turner via wsjt-devel wrote: Is it just coincidental that of the 33 log records only two contain Maidenhead locators. Nope. I've probably worked close a hundred JAs, and I count count the ones who call with their grid without taking my shoes off. But JA hams are n