Hi Bill and MIke,
"and/or If Split is already set in the radio."
Please disregard the comment about the current Split status of the rig. I
forgot that in the response to the 'IF;' command, that message contains the
split indication.My apologies.
73,
Sam W2JDB
_
Well…COM11 and 12 are in Device Manager and they go away when the cable to the
9700 is unplugged and return when it’s plugged in. But in checking their
properties, the Information window of the Events tab says
Device USB\VID_10C4&PID_EA60\IC-9700_12005130_B requires further installation.
Gobbledy
Hi
Using IC9700 with 2.5.2 with out any issue - I don’t recall seeing any hamlib
fixes for 'open com port' being reported recently.
That error suggests COM11 is no longer available - if using windows double
check the device manager to make sure COM11 still exists. Double check it is
not being
Hi Bill,
Yes, Mike clarified the reason for that particular heartbeat in his last
message and thank you for that.
HI Mike: I downloaded the latest DLL and replaced the current one in the bin
folder and the results were the same. The previous test was done with a
replacement DLL that I downloade
Please point me again to the hamlib files that supposedly fix this problem.
Using the same IC 9700 settings that are fine for 2.4.0 and trying to get 2.5.2
to work with it, I get this message even before hitting the Test CAT button:
Rig failure
Hamlib error: IO errorport_open: serial_open(COM
Sam,
you have not understood my comments and the reason for the dummy
command, please read my explanation again.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 16/11/2021 15:00, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Bill,
Any invalid command will result in a '?;' response, even a SET command.
i.e. if you send 'AC000' and
Hi Bill,
Any invalid command will result in a '?;' response, even a SET command.i.e. if
you send 'AC000' and the tuner is already in a 'AC000' state in reply to 'AC;'
command, you will get a '?;' response. I used that example because I ran into
that problem and it took me a while to figure why/
On 16/11/2021 14:07, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote:
I also wondering about the multiple
'ID' requests, is that your version of heartbeat ? Just wondering.
Hi Sam,
the Kenwood protocol does not respond to CAT commands that set things,
so there is a problem with reading any invalid response ('
Hi Mike,
Sorry, I forgot to highlight and mention that at the highlighted lines
belowwhen Split is turned on again, it is actually in reverse where VFO-B is
now receiving and VFO-A is transmitting. This is reverse back to VFO-A Receive
and VFO-B Transmit later on. 73,
Sam W2JDB
-Origin
Hi Mike,
Sorry I got back toyou so late. Life does get in the way. I modified my program
so thatI can give you a more detailed view as to I see happening whenSPLIT=RIG.
I attached a textfile that will give more more detail but I am displaying a
portion below where wsjt-x is preparing for the TX
10 matches
Mail list logo
