On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:28:23 +
Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
> I was very surprised to hear the reports of a large clock error
> causing their TX on the wrong cycle.
It seems that one of their two laptops had a 14 second time error early
in their 8 days on Bouvet, by the last few days th
I worked 3Y0J 17 m FT8 February 11 at 1603 UTC. At that time they were
transmitting "even" and had a clock error of 0.4 seconds. F/H hound mode
worked as expected and moved me from 2579 to 256.
I was very surprised to hear the reports of a large clock error causing their
TX on the wrong cycl
I would look at the water fall display bursts being
over the line and estimate the time offsets.
Wait till the seconds were into the next
minute and set the seconds to 30 + or - the
an estimated correction then start the clock
at 30 seconds.
After decoding a few, I'd check the time
offsets in th
Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 16.2.2023 klo 15.05:
So you do the best you can with what little you have. Who knows, maybe their
GPS was in one of the boxs left on the boat. It seems unfair to criticize when
none of us was there.
No critics, done what was possible.
How ever it seems to
Thank you Jim, NU0C. I certainly agree with your comments. I really
appreciate their efforts and sorry I could not make a contact with them.
Next time maybe.
Bruce WA1YZN
On 2/16/2023 08:05, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote:
They actually had a very detailed plan. FT8 included. But the best l
They actually had a very detailed plan. FT8 included. But the best laid plans
go out the window when mother nature won't let you land most of your gear on
the island.
https://www.3y0j.no/bandplan
So you do the best you can with what little you have. Who knows, maybe their
GPS was in one of t
On 2/15/2023 9:05 AM, Fred Carvalho via wsjt-devel wrote:
However I would like to stick on why and how things happened that caused
so much confusion:
I suspect the fundamental problem with FT8 was like the problem with the
trip as a whole -- poor planning. I I couldn't see radials in relative
Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 15.2.2023 klo 22.17:
Yeah!
HI!
Cqrlog wsjtx-remote can support only one remote wsjtx at time. Using
multicast UDP I think you can have several wsjtxs sending to Cqrlog, but
you have already found the problem that arises.
The remote code is very primit
