Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Marco -- Your feelings are very wrong. — 73, Joe, K1JT From: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 8:07 PM To: 'WSJT software development' Cc: Marco Calistri Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hello, I'm feeling kind of premonition th

Re: [wsjt-devel] Net Hamlib - Mode None Should Not Query Existing Mode

Hi Logan, On 6/1/25 07:15, hobbies.wwsma--- via wsjt-devel wrote: Program Version: WSJT-X Improved v2.8.0 250501 OS: Arch Linux Problem: When using, "Rig: Hamlib NET rigctl" to connect to rigctld daemon for the FT-736R, WSJT-X bails out when rig_get_mode returns -11 for CAT control. The FT-

[wsjt-devel] Net Hamlib - Mode None Should Not Query Existing Mode

Program Version: WSJT-X Improved v2.8.0 250501OS: Arch Linux Problem: When using, "Rig: Hamlib NET rigctl" to connect to rigctld daemon for the FT-736R, WSJT-X bails out when rig_get_mode returns -11 for CAT control. The FT-736R is essentially write-only for CAT control and doesn't support being

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

It's a more mature program than it once was and is not changing as quickly. There hasn't been a new version for a while. But it's still very popular on the bands, so it's hardly at its end of life; it has just reached the point where there aren't so many obvious improvements to make, and people are

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Lance, I'm using FT8 for the 99% of my ham radio activity. I don't know Q65 mode at all, nor EME QSO. I asked such question because I was sort of worry about a possible WSJTX EOL, due the recent drop of traffic noticed in this mailing list. It was only a feeling, of course I am super happy

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Agree! Inviato da Outlook per Android From: Lee Boulineau via wsjt-devel Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 11:07:40 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Lee Boulineau Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? GM Marco, I think the ph

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

GM Marco, I think the phrase "No news is good news" applies here. Keep the faith! 73 de Lee KX4TT   Hello, I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life? I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this is not a good sign for me.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Marco, I am not sure why you are asking your question. Q65-60A with Q65 Pileup option is now the standard mode used worldwide for 6m EME, and other Q65 modes are widely used on other EME bands. In addition, FT8 mode continues to be the favored mode on 6m and many HF bands, because of its gr

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hello, I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life? I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this is not a good sign for me. Of course I hope that my feelings being wrong, but I would like to know better from someone that has