Hi Mike,
I wonder if the retry count could be reset after a successful connection.
73 Alan M0NNB
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:06 PM Alan Hopper
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> this is with WSJT-X connecting to the fake rigctld in SparkSDR. It
> connects and then if a delay happens some time later
RCODE(-retcode))
>
> {
>
> int retry = 3;
>
>
>
> Mike W9MDB
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 12, 2021, 10:08:36 AM CDT, Alan Hopper <
> a...@samsararesearch.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
> I've been doing some testing to tr
Hi all,
I've been doing some testing to try and make the hamlib NET rigctl
connection to SparkSDR as robust as possible. Very infrequently (maybe once
in 24hrs) responses from spark are delayed by a few seconds, This causes a
time out at the WSJT-X side which then auto reconnects which is great,
ho
Hi Joe,
thanks, I'll remove them then. That will make monitoring all at once more
doable.
73 Alan M0NNB
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:04 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> Look at the current Guide. FST4 and FST4W have no submodes with larger
> tone spacings.
>
> On 4/19/2021 3:41 PM,
t message length in seconds. If so those
> are now selected on a spinner T/R from 15 s to 1800 s.
>
> 73, Reino OH3mA
>
>
>
> *Lähettäjä:* Alan Hopper [mailto:a...@samsararesearch.com]
> *Lähetetty:* 19 April 2021 20:32
> *Vastaanottaja:* WSJT software development <
>
Hi,
I'm just tweaking the FST4 support in SparkSDR and had added support for
the A,B,C&D submodes but they do not seem to be an option in the latest
WSJTX, have I missed a setting or should I remove those options?
73 Alan M0NNB
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
#2 0x
#3 0x
#4 0x
#5 0x
#6 0x
#7 0x
#8 0x
#9 0x
#10 0x
#11 0x
#12 0x
#13 0x
#14 0x
73 Alan M0NNB
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 3:45 PM Alan Hopper
wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> thanks for the repl
021 14:40, Alan Hopper wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to write a FST4 encoder without using the source, I'm most of
> the way there using the excellent FT4_FT8_QEX and FST4_Quick_Start docs,
> the latter mentions generator_fst4.datand generator_fst4w.dat which I
> can
the rest:)
73 Alan M0NNB
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:09 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 10/02/2021 14:40, Alan Hopper wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to write a FST4 encoder without using the source, I'm most
> > of the way there using the excellent FT4_FT8_QEX and
Hi,
I'm trying to write a FST4 encoder without using the source, I'm most of
the way there using the excellent FT4_FT8_QEX and FST4_Quick_Start docs,
the latter mentions generator_fst4.datand generator_fst4w.dat which I
can't find. Are these available or can I extract those tables from the
so
Hi Bill,
thanks for the reply, I just tried jt9 -w 1 -m 1 -6 -9 -p 1 -d 3 -L 100 -H
4000 210125_1758.wav and I'm afraid no decodes, checked same cmd on an old
version and that still worked.
73 Alan M0NNB
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 3:27 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 26/01/2021 14:16, Ala
Hi,
I don't seem to be getting any JT9 or JT65 decodes when using jt9.exe
directly. The cmd I use is jt9 -w 1 -m 1 -6 -9 -p 1 -d 3 210125_1758.wav
which works with earlier versions. It now simply returns
0 0. with no errors.
Other modes seem fine. Has the command line changed?
73 Alan M0NNB
quot;\n", 1);
>
> if (ret <= 0)
> {
> return (ret < 0) ? ret : -RIG_EPROTO;
> }
>
> *vfotmp = rig_parse_vfo(buf);
> #else
> vfotmp = "Unknown";
> #endif
>
> And
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2
ay
> to go, then a client can open as many rig connections using the Hamlib API
> as it wishes or separate clients can open one each etc. This is how it is
> kept simple!
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
> On 13/05/2020 17:41, Alan Hopper wrote:
>
> Mike,
> thanks very much,
;
>
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2020, 09:27:48 AM CDT, Alan Hopper <
> a...@samsararesearch.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Bill and Michael
> thanks very much for your reply. I added the response to 'q' but as
> expected no magic fix. The error message from wsjtx is
options for
network connection to Hamlib. The published api for spark is the rigctl
protocol :)
73 Alan M0NNB
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:02 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 13/05/2020 11:43, Alan Hopper wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > I'm the developer of SparkSDR, spark does indeed prete
Hi Bill,
I'm the developer of SparkSDR, spark does indeed pretend to be rigctld and
is not the only one, QUISK also does the same thing. To my mind It makes
good sense to use a published proven network protocol rather than invent
yet another and then have to write further software to use it.
This
On 6/4/2019 6:44 AM, Alan Hopper wrote:
> > on rc7 trying to use jt9.exe to decode a wav works on the 32bit version
> > but fails on the 64bit version. It throws
> > At line 58 of file C:\Users\bill\src\k1jt\wsjtx\lib\readwav.f90
> > Fortran runtime error: Inquire statement
t
> C:\Users\mike\Downloads>\wsjt\wsjtxrc7\bin\jt9 -5 -f 1000 190604_100622.wav
> At line 58 of file C:\Users\bill\src\k1jt\wsjtx\lib\readwav.f90
> Fortran runtime error: Inquire statement identifies an internal file
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, Ju
on rc7 trying to use jt9.exe to decode a wav works on the 32bit version but
fails on the 64bit version. It throws
At line 58 of file C:\Users\bill\src\k1jt\wsjtx\lib\readwav.f90
Fortran runtime error: Inquire statement identifies an internal file
73 Alan M0NNB
_
Hi all, firstly thanks for all the hard work in creating FT4, I'm having
lots of fun with it.
I think I have found a bug when decoding JT9 from the command line:-
C:\Users\alan\AppData\Roaming\m0nnb\SparkSDR2\jt9\jt9tmp_18796012>c:\wsjt\wsjtx21rc5\bin\jt9.exe
-9 -f 7076000 190503_0710.wav
At line
Hi Phil and all
I am also very interested in a better way to interface sdrs to wsjtx than
vac and virtual serial cables. There has been some discussion about it
here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/hermes-lite/ht54gu0vYuE .
I recently discovered that Multipsk has a nicely designed protoco
22 matches
Mail list logo
