is: it depends.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim S.
> N2ADV
>
> On Sep 28, 2024, at 10:16 AM, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel <
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps a message to the user:
>
> "Consider experimenting with AGC settings for best S
Perhaps a message to the user:
"Consider experimenting with AGC settings for best SF decoding"
Bill
W2PKY
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 10:07 AM 5p1kzx via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi all
> Sometimes AGC is usefull and other times AGC off is better. It has to
> decided
They are on 80M regular F/H right now, easy.
GL
Bill W2PKY
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bill Barrett
wrote:
> Hello Gary-
> I worked them last night on 160M from Central Fl. So 80M SB possible.
> Like many I also need 80M. My Qs have been showing up in Club Log the next
> day.
>
> 73 & GL w/8
Hello Gary-
I worked them last night on 160M from Central Fl. So 80M SB possible.
Like many I also need 80M. My Qs have been showing up in Club Log the next
day.
73 & GL w/80M
Bill W2PKY
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 9:44 PM Gary McDuffie via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
The Improved version does not control the Flex SSDR SW properly.
Bill W2PKY
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 6:29 PM Joe via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Is this the latest and greatest version?
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt-x-improved/files/latest/download
> I have
Hello Tom-
You have a good point about the possibility of QRM on the Hounds frequency
when returning the signal report transmission.
Perhaps they will modify the protocol to include the Hound shifting
frequency on that transmission.
Earlier in the thread it was suggested some receivers need to have
I had something similar with RC5 on my Flex Radio where:
Called FOX
FOX Answered with report.
RC5 commanded the radio into transmit but no RF output.
Two replies from the FOX passed with no RF reply from my rig. Was looking
around to learn the problem.
Finally clicked the DAX TX icon on the DAX pa
t; wrote:
>
>
> When I installed the new rc5 software last night I tried the 6000 Slice
> A. Based on the message i received I entered just the IP address of my
> radio no port (looks like it was appending port 4992) and it seemed to work
> from there.
>
> Michael, AA5
e
> A. Based on the message i received I entered just the IP address of my
> radio no port (looks like it was appending port 4992) and it seemed to work
> from there.
>
> Michael, AA5SH
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 10:07 AM Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel <
> wsjt-devel@lists.
or radiohostname:4992 does work.
> AL, K0VM
>
>
> On 7/1/2024 4:40 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > It sounds like you have a value in the "Network Server" box which you
> should not need for the Slice rigs.
> >
> &
A few days ago I worked a ZL stn with 80 watts to a 40ft vertical with just
a few long radials. My report was -11 on FT8.
>From time to time 160M propagation is amazing even during strong Sun Spot
cycle times.
Bill
W2PKY Tampa Fl.
___
wsjt-devel mailing
May want to browse the W8JI website for a lot of interesting information on
all phases of ham radio.
Here's a link to the Beverage antenna section:
https://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm
Have a look at his antenna comparison spreadsheet to get an idea of
performance of various receive antennas. https:/
The error was due to an instance of WSJT-X running while trying to update.
Sri;
Bill W2PKY
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:49 PM Bill Barrett
wrote:
> Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong?
>
>
> Bill W2PKY
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel <
> wsjt-devel@lists.so
Stuck on this error, Am I doing something wrong?
Bill W2PKY
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:28 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> There have been *many* announcements in a variety of places about our
> switch from the Princeton University site to S
.
>
> 73,
>
> Sam W2JDB
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel
> To: WSJT software development
> Cc: Bill Barrett
> Sent: Wed, Sep 7, 2022 8:57 pm
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] Decodes with strong QRM
>
D2UY was interfered with by stns previously worked. The decoder picked out
both stns. Amazing!
Bill W2PKY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Hello Team-
Running 2.5.2 "deep decode" recently saw 90-100 decodes posted on 40M in
the evening but the waterfall and JTAlert show about 1/2.
Finally the Band Activity section shows about 1/2 the large count. Anyone
else seeing this?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:53 AM Andy Durb
VK3AMA via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/2021 1:52 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > Used TCP/IP connection and 224.0.0.1 and ethernet outgoing interface.
> > That works!
> >
> > Bill W2PKY
>
> That tells m
rceforge.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
>>
>> This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
>> does anyone know why they are different?
>>
>> Thanks;
>> Bill W2PKY
>>
>> Y
, 2021 at 10:32 PM Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/2021 12:43 pm, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel wrote:
>
> This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
> does anyone know why they are different?
>
> T
em look the same by putting in the broadcast address of
> 127.0.0.1 and all the other options will go away after you hit OK
>
> All of my instances of WSJT-X have the 244.0.0.1 setup so I can use the
> monitoring software across my farm of PC's
>
> Regards,
> Peter, vk5pj
&
This is from 2.5.0, first and second instance on Win11
does anyone know why they are different?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
ey I/Q data, it is a very convenient cross-platform data
> transfer mechanism for sample data. Note there should be no "Windows audio
> processing" if the sample rate is consistent throughout and the levels are
> set to 0 dB (FS) throughout.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
Hello Bill-
Do you see a possibility that WSJT-X might one day have a direct connection
to SDR Digital Data Stream input bypassing the typical DAX module and
Windows audio processing?
Thanks;
Bill W2PKY
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:48 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.
24 matches
Mail list logo
