I concur with several others; 16GB of RAM is what I consider to be the
baseline on any desktop PC I build.
While I can't specifically comment on JT65 EME ops, I can say that the
current machine I'm running seems to easily handle the mess that is 20m
FT8. It's not unusual for there to be upward
No user interface design will ever be idiot proof. The supply of idiots far
outstrips the supply of programmers.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 28, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Andy Durbin wrote:
>
> Everyone who uses WSJT-X for FT8 must have noticed the number of operators
> who answer a CQ and then, when
Try Notepad++
https://notepad-plus-plus.org/
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Oh, also running W10 1809 and WSJT-X 2.1.0 RC7.
On 6/16/2019 04:01, Jim Nuytens via wsjt-devel wrote:
I'm not a programmer or developer, but I'd like to know the precise
hardware configuration of those having this issue. Down to the minute
details of motherboard, sound interface, e
I'm not a programmer or developer, but I'd like to know the precise
hardware configuration of those having this issue. Down to the minute
details of motherboard, sound interface, etc.
I do not see anything like this at all, and my system runs for days at a
time. Sometimes the system runs for a
Tried that. Still getting the error.
On 6/4/2019 00:27, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Jim,
you need to install the 64-bit version of the OpenSSL libraries.
Follow the instructions in the WSJT-X v2.0.1 User Guide but pick the
Win64 variant of the OpenSSL package. The one you need is the
Win64_Op
Windows 64-bit version seems to be running fine on W10 Pro.
I did find 1 issue. Trying to fetch the latest LoTW .csv file results in
a "SSL/TLS support not installed" message.
WSJT-X 2.0.1 32-bit does not have this problem.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.
As others have said, JT-Alert is built for this. If you use WSJT-X on
Windows, you really need to be using JT-Alert as well.
I won't use WSJT-X without JT-Alert.
On 5/30/2019 12:00, Greg wrote:
I'm working on multiband WAS and am nearing the end. (getting
difficult) Is there anyway to see the
There's always a more determined LID. ;-)
On 4/29/2019 17:29, Bill Somerville wrote:
Christoph,
not disagreeing but there are reasons for this that I can't reveal.
Let's just say it is to deter LIDs. Sorry.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.av
James,
Staggers the imagination, doesn't it?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
While I too am no longer amazed, I’m still highly disappointed that so few
people read documentation at all.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2019, at 11:23 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> I've gotten over the hump of being amazed at people not reading
> anything...just the way
I also had an error message about my ADIF file. Turns out that 1 record
had ,call:4> instead of .
I have no idea how that happened, but it threw the color highlighting
off, giving me notices about new continents on 20m (the band I was tuned
to at the time) that were completely bogus. Once I
*reaches for the whiskey bottle*
On 12/8/2018 01:18, Unni Tharakkal wrote:
I tried different selections and procedures still I am not able to
resolve my RX decoding on RC 5.00. Request help
I synchronized the system clock also
System is ACER with Win 10 and Dig. interface is a BY product Link 3
You can lead them to the manual, but your can't make them RTFM. ;-)
Just saying :-P
On 12/4/2018 20:29, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
I have posted what I'm calling a "minimally acceptable" WSJT-X 2.0
User Guide on the WSJT web site:
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/ws
That's a lot of work for no reason.
Install Meinberg NTP, or Dimension 4, or some other NTP client and
you'll never have to that again.
On 12/4/2018 17:16, Roy Gould wrote:
The method I use to set the clock in Win 10 is:
1) Right click on the time displayed at the lower right of the task bar
My liver is never going to survive this.
On 11/30/2018 11:27, w...@frontier.com wrote:
wsjt 2.0.0.5c5 install rc5 and I can not get anything in the band
activity water fall is ok rc4 and rc5 is the same . I run rc3 and it
work great but rc 4 rc5
can not work any one I can not see. I run wi
As a non-LoTW user, I'd have to agree with Uwe.
I'd much prefer there be a way to highlight non-LoTW folks. Maybe that
way, folks in the USA who do use LoTW would stop calling me, especially
when I'm calling for DX.
On 11/28/2018 15:14, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
May I ask you for a slight change
Better bring a fresh bottle. I'm out.
On 11/19/2018 14:27, George J. Molnar wrote:
I’m going to take a deep breath or six. Then maybe join in the Scotch
Drinking Club.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
___
-18 is perfectly acceptable here. I’ll work any DX station, even if it’s at
-23, if I need it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 17, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> PSKReporter shows he saw you at -18dB -- perhaps your path to him wasn't all
> that good.
> I've heard a
Hasan,
That's not entirely correct. RC3 can decode RC4 TXs, but RC4 doesn't
decode RC3 TXs, unless you set RC3 to 77-bit messages in settings.
I have been running RC4 on and off for the last several days. I can get
spots on PSK Reporter from stations running RC3. It's just that if they
respo
Somebody poor me another shot. ;-)
On 11/16/2018 12:16, iw2etr Paolo Fiorelli wrote:
Hello everyone, can anyone understand why installing the rc4 I do not
receive the station? with 1.9.1 everything is ok.
thank you
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
You are correct. Neither of those modes ever had an auto sequence. A fact I had
to recently relearn about 2 weeks ago.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 4:27 PM, Neil Zampella wrote:
>
> Um ... I don't remember JT65 or JT9 having any auto-sequence setup in WSJT-X.
> They are both 42
My first attempt at a contact with a non-standard call resulted in the
program jumping back to Tx1, instead of Tx5. Below is the sequence:
132530 9 0.1 1343 ~ CQ OE100KFV
132545 Tx 1700 ~ KJ3N
132600 8 0.1 1343 ~ KJ3N -02
132615 Tx 1700 ~ KJ3N R+08
132630 9 0.1 1343
All I know is that I'm all for showing who's not on LoTW. Maybe then
I'll get some peace and quiet from people in the USA when they see my
call show up in Red.
Full disclosure: I'm not on LoTW.
On 9/20/2018 16:55, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Is this logic backwards here??? Seems we
How does one switch to GIT? My JTSDK is still pointing to SVN/Sourceforge.
On 8/17/2018 12:28, Neil Zampella wrote:
Many people build their own version, if you build WSJT-X right now,
you'll get 1.9.2.
The only difference (as I understand it) between it, and v1.9.1 is
that the source code
The last couple of times I've tried to build the latest devel version on
Windows, it seems stuck at v1.10.0-devel r8748.
Have I done something wrong, or missed an update to the JTSDK?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-
I just built a new W10 machine and installed the JTSDK from scratch. My
first completed build resulted in v1.10-rc1-8732 as well.
Is this the correct result?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
---
Would you care to elaborate what those advantages are?
On 5/24/2018 21:36, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Jim,
yes there are advantages, I recommend switching to Qt 5.5.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
I've been compiling my own builds on W7-64bit for a couple of years,
always using QT5.2.
Are there any reasons or advantages to switching to QT5.5? Any
disadvantages?
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of
I find 20m already useless for casual operation. To be blunt, I find the band a
constant shit show. I avoid it as much as possible.
It’s not much better on 40m, either.
> On May 10, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Gary McDuffie wrote:
>
>> Not to mention that the FT8 segments are already VERY crowded. Ad
30 matches
Mail list logo
