Hi Joe,
My misunderstandingQRA64 is, of course, a different protocol and therefore
will not decode the current beacon.
— John G4KLA
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-dev
Hi John,
On 8/5/2016 7:55 AM, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Clarification point: I am running r7004 on 2m listening to a beacon
> (GB3VHF) 150 miles away on the back of the antenna which is not raised.
> Decoding JT65B -22 to -24db; clear trace on waterfall.
>
> But no decode for QRA64 wi
Hi Joe,
Clarification point: I am running r7004 on 2m listening to a beacon (GB3VHF)
150 miles away on the back of the antenna which is not raised. Decoding JT65B
-22 to -24db; clear trace on waterfall.
But no decode for QRA64 with either submode B or E. Are there tuning
parameters that n
Thanks Joe. I hadn't noticed until just now that this was on the devel
list, which I try to monitor silently, just to try to keep up, and which
I apparently haven't done very well at. :)
73, Jim
On Thu,8/4/2016 3:09 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Jim --
>
> Sorry if you are confused. Short-cycle opti
Jim --
Sorry if you are confused. Short-cycle options are "there" is WSJT10,
and have been for a year or so; and for a slightly shorter time for
WSJT-X v1.7 (nee v1.6.1).
I had supposed that since you were writing to the developer's email
list, you were asking about the "-devel" code revision
On Thu,8/4/2016 1:50 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 8/4/2016 4:19 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> Those of us wanting to use your modes for E-skip would really appreciate
>> the inclusion of short-cycle versions of the relevant protocols like ISCAT.
> Not sure what you might mean.
>
> Short-cycle o
Hi Jim,
On 8/4/2016 4:19 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> Those of us wanting to use your modes for E-skip would really appreciate
> the inclusion of short-cycle versions of the relevant protocols like ISCAT.
Not sure what you might mean.
Short-cycle options for all of the fast modes (JT9E-H "fast", ISCAT
On Thu,8/4/2016 1:09 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> suggest any additions or improvements that occur to you.
Hi Joe,
Those of us wanting to use your modes for E-skip would really appreciate
the inclusion of short-cycle versions of the relevant protocols like ISCAT.
Thanks and 73, Jim K9YC
--
Dear Colleagues,
With many recent enhancements to the experimental modes QRA64 and MSK144
and some cleanup of certain GUI features, we are almost ready to make an
open Alpha Release of WSJT-X v1.7.
It could be based on code revision r7002 (or perhaps slightly later, if
we find any problems in
Hi Bill,
I'd be happy to work with you to help the documentation get a bit more
clear about this issue. Let's work off reflector to make it happen, OK?
Would you drop me a note and tell me exactly where you would like things
explicated a bit further?
Best,
Chase
http://w4ti.com
On Fri, May 23,
Hi Bill,
I understand your reservations. When/if we make an announcement about a
candidate release, we can -- and should! -- identify known issues. (For
example, control of Icom rigs via Commander and direct control of
FT-817/FT-857/FT-897 rigs.) People with those rigs and control systems
s
On 23/05/2014 19:36, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Joe,
>
> I'll be traveling again and mostly out of email contact from tomorrow
> through June 3. A couple of thoughts, before I leave:
>
> 1. Can we get a version of WSJT-X suitable for a beta release ready in
> the reasonably near future? It do
Hi all,
I'll be traveling again and mostly out of email contact from tomorrow
through June 3. A couple of thoughts, before I leave:
1. Can we get a version of WSJT-X suitable for a beta release ready in
the reasonably near future? It doesn't need to be perfect. For
example, if there are sti
13 matches
Mail list logo
