On 07/07/2017 14:43, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
For Bill
The easy way to test functionality is to remove set_vfo from dummy.c
in hamlib and test with that and rigctld.
WSJT-X will fail. So it's just changing the set_vfo capability logic
to match get the get_vfo logic.
Bill's
Freq column and with short modes.
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
>
> *From:* Bill Somerville
> *To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:12 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
>
&
h short modes.
de Mike W9MDB
*From:* Bill Somerville
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:12 AM
*Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I've
On 07/07/2017 07:58, Adrian Fabry wrote:
2. For the saved wav files, mode and submode should be included in the
file name
Hi Ady,
more information is included in the catalogue of the WAV files. It can
be examined using a tool like Audacity to look at the metadata. It is
unfortunate that the
Hi Joe,
thank you and all the development team for the work.
I'd suggest two features:
1. QRA64: Different color (or using bold chars) for the AP part of the
decoded message, when AP was used in the decode.
2. For the saved wav files, mode and submode should be included in the file
name
73 Ady
12 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I've got 3 patches outstanding
#1 Menu controls working when controls are hidden + CTRL-E/Shift-E shortcuts
for enabling/disabling Tx even/1st #2 Fix rigctld aborti
Thank you, Michael. I’ve been confused as to the function of the slider - it
never seemed to do anything for me because I’ve always left Flatten checked.
It seems like education is needed in either case (leaving it on the main
window, or moving it to the waterfall window). In that case, it mak
opment
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
Thank you, Michael. I’ve been confused as to the function of the slider - it
never seemed to do anything for me because I’ve always left Flatten checked.
It seems like education is n
Hi Al,
On 7/6/2017 3:59 PM, CX8AT VERA wrote:
Maybe I missed something when reading this group's mail, but something
that I don't like is to have 2 windows (main window and wide graph)
apart, is hard for me to keep both with the right size in a small wide
13" notebook, It is possible to have
graph and Wide
graph, though if Flatten is checked on the Widegraph than the slider control is
not effective.
de Mike W9MDB
From: Bill Somerville
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
Hi Joe
Maybe I missed something when reading this group's mail, but something
that I don't like is to have 2 windows (main window and wide graph)
apart, is hard for me to keep both with the right size in a small wide
13" notebook, It is possible to have both just in one windows? this
maybe
On 06/07/2017 20:43, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
This was discussed a while ago and those users who were using the
FastGraph wanted to keep the control on the main window.
So...preferring usability over confusion was the result and it was
decided to keep it on the main window.
It wil
nt: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
About the former “digital gain” slider - yes, I agree it’s time to move it out
of the main window. If the functionality is retained in the fast and slow
graphs, then it can be eliminated entirely. We might w
About the former “digital gain” slider - yes, I agree it’s time to move it out
of the main window. If the functionality is retained in the fast and slow
graphs, then it can be eliminated entirely. We might want to consider unifying
the waterfall controls in a pop up that can be hidden once adjus
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> We talked about removing the slider and putting it on the waterfall but some
> wanted it to remain on the main screen.
Commenting ONLY on this part of it, the slider does seem a bit redundant, and I
could easily do with
, July 06, 2017 11:08 AM
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
What change? The meter shows the recording level now instead of the waterfall
level. The slider controls the waterfall and not the meter anymore (it never
hael ; WSJT software development
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
Mike
The change that disconnected the thermometer from the waterfall slider.
A number of folks set the input audio at any old level and adjusted the
slider to
e Mike W9MDB
From: Steven Franke
To: Joe Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
The following come to mind:
- Phase and amplitude equalization for MSK144. (We/I need to fix the refspec
part of this, and also write up
;
> From: "char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk"
>
> To: WSJT software development
> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
>
> Hi Joe
>
> Perhaps worth mentioning the change to the audio
On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I've got 3 patches outstanding
#1 Menu controls working when controls are hidden + CTRL-E/Shift-E
shortcuts for enabling/disabling Tx even/1st
#2 Fix rigctld aborting on rigs without set_vfo (e.g. FT-891/991)
#3 Fix QSO start times for d
W9MDB
From: "char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk"
To: WSJT software development
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
Hi Joe
Perhaps worth mentioning the change to the audio level setting to avoid
i
10:49 AM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'm compiling a list of important new features and other changes that
will be in WSJT-X v1.8.
1. New mode called FT8: QSOs 4 times faster than JT9, JT65
2. New mode for Frequency Calibration
3. Improved perf
Hi Joe
Perhaps worth mentioning the change to the audio level setting to avoid
inadvertent clipping - folks now have to adjust soundcard level controls,
radio level or external 'attenuator'.
Charlie
> Hi all,
>
> I'm compiling a list of important new features and other changes that
> will be
The following come to mind:
- Phase and amplitude equalization for MSK144. (We/I need to fix the refspec
part of this, and also write up some docs)
- SWL mode for MSK144 allows third-party monitoring Sh-message QSOs.
- Enhanced frequency management scheme (Bill should contribute the proper
descr
Hi all,
I'm compiling a list of important new features and other changes that
will be in WSJT-X v1.8.
1. New mode called FT8: QSOs 4 times faster than JT9, JT65
2. New mode for Frequency Calibration
3. Improved performance of decoders for JT65, QRA64, and MSK144
4. New utility programs: ms
25 matches
Mail list logo
