How do I get Verizon 2.0 until all the bugs are out of revision 4.?
I put 1.9 back on but want 2.0!
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
How do I get Verizon 2.0 until all the bugs are out of revision 4.?
I put 1.9 back on but want 2.0!
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
On 24/11/2018 20:16, Microsoft Outlook wrote:
How do I get Verizon 2.0 until all the bugs are out of revision 4.?
I put 1.9 back on but want 2.0!
OM,
you will have to use your time machine. You did purchase one on Black
Friday?
WSJT-X v2.0.0 is scheduled for release on December 10th 2018.
Will rc5 restore the "nextcall" contesting feature?
Ed W0YK
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
On 25/11/2018 02:12, Ed Muns wrote:
Will rc5 restore the "nextcall" contesting feature?
Ed W0YK
Hi Ed,
no it will not, sorry about that. The first attempt at implementation
proved to be quite buggy and we feel that it is too near GA date to
implement the scale of changes required to make it
Disappointed, but understand, Bill. Thanks for the quick reply (and, all
the great effort on these releases!).
Ed W0YK
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: 24 November, 2018 18:22
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel
From: Ed Muns
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 6:34:32 PM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Version 2.0 rc5
Disappointed, but understand, Bill. Thanks for the quick reply (and, all
the great effort on these releases!).
Ed W0YK
-Original Message
On 25/11/2018 02:50, David Fisher wrote:
This raises the interesting question: Do you expect to create a 2.0.1
version after the dust settles and small number of bugs appear that
need swatting? This would be bug fixes only, not new features. Just
wondering about your point of view on this.
I'm having a lot of problems using JT65 for EME. The right hand pane,
Average Decodes, seems to have a mind of it's own. For instance, earlier I
was trying to work N5TM and I did copy two of his sequences. Now, an hour
later I am just sitting here watching the screen and suddenly in the average
Hi Russ,
some comments in line. BTW I don't operate EME so these are based on
looking at the source code alone.
On 15/12/2018 00:33, Russ wrote:
I'm having a lot of problems using JT65 for EME. The right hand pane,
Average Decodes, seems to have a mind of it's own. For instance, earlier I
w
Bill, here is the matching portion from the all.txt file:
2118 -26 2.5 1391 #* W4TAA AA4FF EM50 f
2119 -23 2.9 1453 #* CQ W4TAA EL87 f
181214_212000 Transmitting 144.12 MHz JT65: W4TAA K2TXB FN20
2119 -23 2.9 1453 #* CQ W4TAA EL87
Bill
If deep search is engaged, does it look through call3.txt randomly, or
start for example at the most recent entry?
Charlie
> Hi Russ,
>
> some comments in line. BTW I don't operate EME so these are based on
> looking at the source code alone.
>
> On 15/12/2018 00:33, Russ wrote:
>> I'm havi
Hi Charlie,
On 12/15/2018 12:38, G3WDG wrote:
If deep search is engaged, does it look through call3.txt randomly, or
start for example at the most recent entry?
Deep Search uses whatever is saved in CALL3.TXT. There's nothing
'random' about it, and order in the file does not matter. If you
Bill, Joe, Charlie, whoever is interested; here is a new wrinkle to the
problem.
I was operating MSK144 on 2 meters. Got done and decided to switch to JT65
to see if the false decodes would start to happen. It didn't right away, so
went away for a while leaving it running. When I got back I had
Hi Joe
Russ's report noted the reappearance of a callsign that had previously
been decoded ( probably recently) which was then seen as the content
average decode *even after the program was closed and restarted*, and
clear average pressed.
I was therefore wondering whether the decoder was using a
Russ --
You're calling some displays "bogus decodes", and evidently they are
bogus. But you appear to have all the knobs turned up to maximum
aggressiveness. Most if the displayed messages are flagged with "?",
which you may interpret as "caveat emptor", or some such.
Probably you saved "K
en the bogus
decodes (while averaging) show up, there is nothing at all shown in the
averaging window (F7).
Thanks for your help.
73, Russ K2TXB
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Taylor
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:31 PM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject:
ny
kind is received by the logging program, so it is not just a case of a
different format.
Thanks for any help.
73, Russ K2TXB
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Taylor
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:31 PM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Ver
reported this before, but when the bogus
decodes (while averaging) show up, there is nothing at all shown in the
averaging window (F7).
Thanks for your help.
73, Russ K2TXB
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:31 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subje
19 matches
Mail list logo
