On 08/04/2016 08:19, Charles Suckling wrote:
> Just trying out r6596 here. From modes tried (JT4, 9 and 65) pressing Tune
> activates rig PTT and audio tone, but on pressing again rig stays on TX,
> with no tone output.
>
> Also seen the TX audio level slider jump, but no recipe for that yet.
Hi C
Hi All
Just trying out r6596 here. From modes tried (JT4, 9 and 65) pressing Tune
activates rig PTT and audio tone, but on pressing again rig stays on TX,
with no tone output.
Also seen the TX audio level slider jump, but no recipe for that yet.
Tune button behaviour normal in r6574.
73
Cha
On 07/04/2016 23:58, Bill Somerville wrote:
> I believe that the few rigs that appear not to have a way of setting
> mode without touching bandwidth actually do. For example early CI-V
> Icoms have the 06 command to set mode and bandwidth but the bandwidth
> part can be omitted which is not documen
On 07/04/2016 23:43, Michael Black wrote:
> But why couldn't you just remember the bw from get_mode and keep using
> that rather than wholesale changes to hamlib?
> And allowing the user to put bandwidth in the rig settings too so, for
> examle, you don't have to reset all the bands on your rig wh
That works. Started with both VFOs on LSB and Mode=USB and rig split.
On band change it switched to USB and left bandwidth alone.
But why couldn't you just remember the bw from get_mode and keep using
that rather than wholesale changes to hamlib?
And allowing the user to put bandwidth in the rig s
On 07/04/2016 22:33, Bill Somerville wrote:
> I know what is happening now. The issue is due to using a new Hamlib API
> function to set split frequency and mode together in one step. This is
> essential for many rigs because setting the two separately takes many
> VFO swaps which is disruptive to
On 07/04/2016 21:40, Michael Black wrote:
> In 6589 no bandwidth change
Hi Mike,
I suggested a minimal test of:
"A minimal test is probably to set the rig to something other than USB
then start WSJT-X, you may need to select a band in WSJT-X to get it to
change the rig mode depending on setting
On 07/04/2016 20:52, Michael Black wrote:
> However, on 6597 if I switch split to None and Mode=USB, then the
> bandwidth does not change.
Hi Mike,
assuming this sets the rig mode to USB then a trace of that would be
interesting. That is because I don't see how it can avoid changing the
bandwidt
I've been using USB/Rig Split for a LONG time.
6590 started changing the bandwidth. Changing to Mode=None stopped
it. (still on rig split)
6596 still shows that behavior
6597 still shows that behavior.
However, on 6597 if I switch split to None and Mode=USB, then the
bandwidth does not change
On 06/04/2016 19:07, Michael Black wrote:
> USB
>
> I found the setting in Advanced for the JT65 receiver bandwidth affects it.
...
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> >On 06/04/2016 19:01, Michael Black wrote:
>>> >>First problem I ran into.
>>> >>Switching bands on my T
On 07/04/2016 14:06, George J Molnar wrote:
> MLDX talks to the rig directly. In this case, using CAT over serial. It also
> provides a UDP interface for other apps. FLDIGI, for example, interacts with
> MLDX this way, so frequency display, etc., doesn't need a RigCAT or Hamlib
> port configured
Hi Bill,
Hope I get this right...
MLDX talks to the rig directly. In this case, using CAT over serial. It also
provides a UDP interface for other apps. FLDIGI, for example, interacts with
MLDX this way, so frequency display, etc., doesn't need a RigCAT or Hamlib port
configured.
JT-Bridge pic
On 07/04/2016 04:27, George J Molnar wrote:
> OS X 10.11 using JT Bridge and MacLoggerDX.
Hi George,
how does DXLabs fit into that set up?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
___
wsjt-devel mail
Hi Charlie, Bill,
I am assuming we're talking about Windows and Hamlib3 from Bills
integration branch.
You can build Hamlib3 from either JTSDK-QT or JTSDK-MSYS. The command
should be the same for both:
build-hamlib3
If you want to enable custom options or build a specific Hamlib target,
you'll
Possible bug - when using DXLabs network control, upon dropping out of
transmit, my rig now switches to LSB instead of staying in USB (or any other
mode). Doesn't matter what setting for None/USB/digi is used. This is new
behavior.
OS X 10.11 using JT Bridge and MacLoggerDX. MLDX runs Yaesu FT1
On 06/04/2016 22:36, Michael Black wrote:
> Don't know if it helps anybut "Test Cat" does not change the bandwidth.
> Then closing the settings window does.
Hi Mike,
that makes sense, all "Test CAT" tries is open the rig connection and a
read frequency. Exiting the settings sets up the rig re
Don't know if it helps anybut "Test Cat" does not change the bandwidth.
Then closing the settings window does.
RRR
Mike W9MDB
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 20:45, Michael Black wrote:
>> None does not touch anything as expected.
>> I've been running
On 06/04/2016 20:45, Michael Black wrote:
> None does not touch anything as expected.
> I've been running in USB mode for ages and never had this problem
> before. I always run 4500hz bandwidth.
> Not a big deal to make the choice on the rig and stick with None. But
> if it should be ignoring the
None does not touch anything as expected.
I've been running in USB mode for ages and never had this problem
before. I always run 4500hz bandwidth.
Not a big deal to make the choice on the rig and stick with None. But
if it should be ignoring the bandwidth then the patch would be
preferable.
Mike
On 06/04/2016 19:01, Michael Black wrote:
> First problem I ran into.
> Switching bands on my TenTec Omni VII changes the bandwidth to 2400
> every time. Previously bandwidth was never touched.
Hi Mike,
I can see why this is happening but it should have been like that
before. The issue is that t
Hi Bill
Thanks.
No, the Vista machine is still putting up a fight. Greg has been very
helpful and I thought I was getting close but now trying to start the main
installer does nothing. It has always been slow to start, but 30 minutes
and no signs of anything happening can't be right.
The Win7
I think it will work okay as it is. The 746 does not have dual
watch, as you said, but it does display the VFO B frequency, so it's
easy to keep an eye on it.
Will try it out for a bit and test it further.
Tnx es 73
Dave 'Doc' Corio
On 4/6/2016 2:26 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 0
On 06/04/2016 19:12, Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote:
> Yes. Hadn't tried transmitting, as VFO B wasn't even on the same
> band, but it DID change to the correct frequency when "Tune" was
> clicked. However, VFO B would not return to the correct offset when
> changed on the Wide Graph.
Hi Dave,
I can
On 06/04/2016 19:13, Michael Black wrote:
> Changing the JT65 bandwidth changed the rig bandwidth. At least I swear it
> did.
> Just tried to repeat the effect and couldn't so perhaps I was
> hallucinating on that one.
Hi Mike,
definitely hallucinating;) That setting is only for degrading a read
On 06/04/2016 19:11, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
> Does this mean that if I build with JTSDK now, the program will include
> your latest changes?
>
> How do I as a JTSDK user update my Hamlib, or does this happen automatically?
Hi Charlie,
yes the Doppler tracking and sked freq
Changing the JT65 bandwidth changed the rig bandwidth. At least I swear it did.
Just tried to repeat the effect and couldn't so perhaps I was
hallucinating on that one.
RRR
Mike W9MDB
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 19:07, Michael Black wrote:
>> I found
Yes. Hadn't tried transmitting, as VFO B wasn't even on the same
band, but it DID change to the correct frequency when "Tune" was
clicked. However, VFO B would not return to the correct offset when
changed on the Wide Graph.
73
Dave 'Doc' Corio
On 4/6/2016 2:07 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Bill
Does this mean that if I build with JTSDK now, the program will include
your latest changes?
How do I as a JTSDK user update my Hamlib, or does this happen automatically?
I'm a bit reluctant to touch anything on JTSDK as my attempts to reinstall
it on my Vista machine have failed totally
On 06/04/2016 19:07, Michael Black wrote:
> I found the setting in Advanced for the JT65 receiver bandwidth affects it.
Effects what? That setting shouldn't have any bearing on rig control.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
_
On 06/04/2016 19:03, Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote:
> The changes had a negative affect here, Bill. My IC-746 VFO A
> changes to the correct frequency when entered in the drop-down band
> window, but VFO B remains on whatever frequency it was set to before.
>
> Also, changing frequency using t
USB
I found the setting in Advanced for the JT65 receiver bandwidth affects it.
RRR
Mike W9MDB
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 19:01, Michael Black wrote:
>> First problem I ran into.
>> Switching bands on my TenTec Omni VII changes the bandwidth to 2400
On 06/04/2016 19:01, Michael Black wrote:
> First problem I ran into.
> Switching bands on my TenTec Omni VII changes the bandwidth to 2400
> every time. Previously bandwidth was never touche
Hi Mike,
thanks for the report. Which radio button do you have set for
"Settings->Radio->Mode"?
73
Bill
The changes had a negative affect here, Bill. My IC-746 VFO A
changes to the correct frequency when entered in the drop-down band
window, but VFO B remains on whatever frequency it was set to before.
Also, changing frequency using the Wide Graph has no effect of the
rig at all.
First problem I ran into.
Switching bands on my TenTec Omni VII changes the bandwidth to 2400
every time. Previously bandwidth was never touched.
RRR
Mike W9MDB
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have just committed a bunch of changes that I have been workin
Hi All,
I have just committed a bunch of changes that I have been working on for
some time. Some are potentially disruptive and I welcome any testing of
rig control using the various modes. For those using WSJT-X for EME,
particularly on the microwave bands, any reports on testing the Doppler
35 matches
Mail list logo
