Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Jim, 7047.5 is in the DATA sub band outside the united states. The merits of that band position selection for FT4 are perhaps still debatable, but it is most certainly not in the CW segment as far as the rest of the world is concerned. If we are going into history, even the placement of 7076 fo

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote: > I suggest beginning with moving FT4 out of the CW portion of the 40M band, > and understanding that the needed spectrum is 3 kHz. > 40m is a problematic band. Most of the world used to have only 7-7.1MHz, which was when the present 40m band plan developed. In th

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Brian, Every journey/task begins with a single step. It would begin with a study of watering holes (dial frequencies) on each band, with two concentrations. First, those that are causing QRM to other users of the bands during contests, moving all activity above .070. Second, reducing the s

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

One more. John L. Broughton 2silverhon...@gmail.com www.wb9vgj.us On 6/8/2025 12:50 AM, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote: On 6/7/2025 3:54 PM, Tom Hauer via wsjt-devel wrote: I am astonished at how anyone with such a lack of knowledge and understanding could even consider criticism of someone wh

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:09:55 -0700 Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote: > Joe, I have great respect for you and the team that has developed > your software, and have long advocated for and promoted its use. But > you're still missing the major point of my criticism, which is that > coordination of the

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

On 6/7/2025 3:54 PM, Tom Hauer via wsjt-devel wrote: I am astonished at how anyone with such a lack of knowledge and understanding could even consider criticism of someone who has contributed so much, without asking for anything in return, to our hobby and to the capabilities of radio communica

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Incredibly ignorant.  Please stop this thread. 73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” MarshARRL A1 Operator 3905 Century Club Master #473905 Century Club 8th Area DirectorHurricane Watch Net memberPortage County Amateur Radio Service trusteeOn Jun 7, 2025, at 6:57 PM, Tom Hauer via wsjt-devel wrote:To K9YC,I a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

To K9YC, I am astonished at how anyone with such a lack of knowledge and understanding could even consider criticism of someone who has contributed so much, without asking for anything in return, to our hobby and to the capabilities of radio communication. You need to open your eyes, understand a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

On 6/7/2025 10:26 AM, Joseph Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: I've been a ham for more than seventy years. This August marks my 70th anniversary as a ham. I was active on the HF bands to experience SSB taking over from AM, and all of the antipathy that ensued. I switched when I was out of school

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

c., ...] that you think have been made years ago, by others. > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > -- > *From:* Jim Brown via wsjt-devel > *Sent:* Friday, June 6, 2025 3:14 PM > *To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > *Cc:* Jim Brown > *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

wsjt-devel Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 3:14 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jim Brown Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Joe, On 6/6/2025 8:42 AM, Joseph Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: > We (developers of the digital protocols in WSJT and its sister programs) &g

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Joe, Greeting from nice weather weekend just before rainy season here in Japan. I am fine with your comment if you "WSJT developer team" has already being working for next generation format, such as sensitivity and fading performance of FT8 (15 Second format) to be compatible with WSPR (one

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Joe, On 6/6/2025 8:42 AM, Joseph Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: We (developers of the digital protocols in WSJT and its sister programs) have never dictated any band usage plans or unilaterally set any rules for particular frequencies. But when you plugged default frequencies into you soft

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

That 3 kHz slice that is being occupied by FT8 on most bands is supporting DOZENS of simultaneous QSOs when the band is open. That's spectral efficiency that no other popular mode can match, not even CW. Each signal on FT8 is about 50 Hz wide, so in theory there could be 60 active QSOs without mutu

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Jim, K9YC: You write here of "major errors," "massive failures," "developers living in their own world," "failing to consult with other users of the spectrum," etc., etc. You write: "The major error that developers made way back when, and CONTINUE to make, is to chew up way too much spectru

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

On 6/2/2025 8:41 PM, Tsutsumi Takehiko via wsjt-devel wrote: Allow me to make comment on bandwidth topic as I was involved and actually decided FT8 bandwidth as "2kHz" (as I did not know such popularity for FT8) on 40m/80m, wondering the proper spectrum allocation methodology in 2017. The maj

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

o Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hello Take, Currently the bandwidth WSJT-X supports for all modes is 5kHz. Exception is MSK144 that uses the whole bandwidth 300Hz to 2700Hz of a SSB transmitter. Of course, your radio needs to support the 5 kHz bandwidth. See User Guide 5. Tran

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

setting’. 73, Reino OH3mA From: Tsutsumi Takehiko via wsjt-devel Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6:41 AM To: WSJT software development Cc: Tsutsumi Takehiko Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi all, Allow me to make comment on bandwidth topic as I was involved and actually

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

: 2025 年 6 月 2 日 (月曜日) 12:09 宛先: WSJT software development Cc: vk3oe 件名: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? WSJT-X the next big step is to use much wider bandwidths, 10kHz and up. Andrew VK3OE. Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel Date:

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

WSJT-X the next big step is to use much wider bandwidths, 10kHz and up.Andrew VK3OE.Sent from my Galaxy Original message From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel Date: 1/6/25 11:07 pm (GMT+10:00) To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel Cc: Larry Banks Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

-devel wrote: YES you're right about that! Inviato da Outlook per Android From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 9:25:31 AM To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel Cc: Larry Banks Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Marco, The drop in traffic is also caused b

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

YES you're right about that! Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Larry Banks via wsjt-devel Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 9:25:31 AM To: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel Cc: Larry Banks Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

s://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> *From:* Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel *Sent:* Saturday, May 31, 2025 10:23:09 PM *To:* Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel *Cc:* Lance Collister, W7GJ *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Marco,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

rom: Hasan N0AN Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 7:57:28 AM To: WSJT software development Cc: kx...@yahoo.com ; Marco Calistri Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Marco, If you want to see a shorter development cycle, look for WSJT-X Improved Plus by Uwe, DG2YCB, who is part of the development te

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

s://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > -- > *From:* Lee Boulineau via wsjt-devel > *Sent:* Saturday, May 31, 2025 11:07:40 PM > *To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > *Cc:* Lee Boulineau > *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? > > GM Marco, > > I t

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Marco -- Your feelings are very wrong. — 73, Joe, K1JT From: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 8:07 PM To: 'WSJT software development' Cc: Marco Calistri Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hello, I'm feeling kind

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

It's a more mature program than it once was and is not changing as quickly. There hasn't been a new version for a while. But it's still very popular on the bands, so it's hardly at its end of life; it has just reached the point where there aren't so many obvious improvements to make, and people are

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

J Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? Hi Marco, I am not sure why you are asking your question. Q65-60A with Q65 Pileup option is now the standard mode used worldwide for 6m EME, and other Q65 modes are widely used on other EME bands. In addition, FT8 mode continues to be the favored mo

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Agree! Inviato da Outlook per Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Lee Boulineau via wsjt-devel Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 11:07:40 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Lee Boulineau Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.? GM Marco, I thi

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

GM Marco, I think the phrase "No news is good news" applies here. Keep the faith! 73 de Lee KX4TT   Hello, I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life? I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this is not a good sign for me.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hi Marco, I am not sure why you are asking your question. Q65-60A with Q65 Pileup option is now the standard mode used worldwide for 6m EME, and other Q65 modes are widely used on other EME bands. In addition, FT8 mode continues to be the favored mode on 6m and many HF bands, because of its gr

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?

Hello, I'm feeling kind of premonition that WSJT-X could has reached its End Of Life? I don't see many messages here on the mailing-list from some time, and this is not a good sign for me. Of course I hope that my feelings being wrong, but I would like to know better from someone that has

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0 GA Release

TNX Joe et al! I was quite successful during the recent 6m EME DXpedition to ZD9, making 173 EME contacts, but I had the luxury there of being able to monitor a chat page while I was on the air. So I could see which stations reported copying me at a particular time. I am planning another 6m

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0 GA Release

Hi Joe: No files to translate the news ? Thank you for your work ! -- Xavi Canyadell, EA3W Telèfon +34670243468 http://www.ea3w.cat El 17/2/2025 a les 14:02, Joseph Taylor via wsjt-devel ha escrit: The WSJT Development Team is pleased to announce the WSJT-X 2.7.0 General Availability (G

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0 GA Release

The WSJT Development Team is pleased to announce the WSJT-X 2.7.0 General Availability (GA) release. This is the first GA release since version 2.6.1, two years ago. Major enhancements include a new companion program called QMAP, new Special Operating Activities called “Q65 Pileup” and “SuperFox

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

G4CCH via wsjt-devel Cc: Nic Sears Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s Hi Howard, Nic G3YEG here, You may find that doing the full Windows 11 update sorts it out - I know it takes a long time even on my fast machine with loads of memory

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

Hi Howard, Nic G3YEG here, You may find that doing the full Windows 11 update sorts it out - I know it takes a long time even on my fast machine with loads of memory !! On my system there was an Intel sound driver update a while ago that lost all the sound ports which I backed out and left it

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

Hi Howard, glad you managed to find that Windows trick. 73, Reino OH3mA From: Howard - G4CCH via wsjt-devel Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:00 PM To: WSJT software development Cc: Howard - G4CCH Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s Hi Reino, I

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

again.Thanks again for your help73, Howard G4CCH Sent from Outlook for AndroidFrom: Howard - G4CCH via wsjt-devel Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:37:11 amTo: WSJT software development Cc: Howard - G4CCH Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890sHi Reino and CharlieThanks

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

usy with other stuff today, but maybe this evening...Will get back to youThanks and 73Howard G4CCH Sent from Outlook for AndroidFrom: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:10:00 amTo: 'WSJT software development' Cc: Reino Talarmo Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJ

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

: Howard - G4CCH Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s Hi Charlie, I'm hoping you can help me with this, if not then please pass me on to someone who can... Wsjt-x has been working perfectly for years until today. I went to use it today and found I ha

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc7 Superfox error report

Hi Scott and Ed The team is aware of this and it has been corrected. The fix is already in place in WSJT-X -improved and will be included in the next release of WSJT-X. Not sure what Ftol setting you were using, but experience is that the error only appears at high values, eg 1000Hz. There is n

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc7 Superfox error report

Hi Ed, I reported the same error back in September. I can reproduce the error 100% of the time by doing the following. The following actions were taken to trigger the error. 1. Launch WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc7 2. Set to Super Hound mode. 3. Set the Tx DF to a DF greater than 1450 Hz by either shift le

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc7 Superfox error report

I don't know if S21DX is setup correct. On 17m last night, I and others called it on F/H many times without response, it just kept calling CQ and was never seen to work anyone I saw. Seems they were not decoding anyone, perhaps their time sync is bad .. 73 vk4tux On 17/12/24 10:23, jan0--

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc7 Superfox error report

While (unsuccessfully) attempting a Superfox decode of S21DX on 1836 kHz tonight, WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc7 threw the following error: Subprocess Error Subprocess failed with exit code 2 Details: Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin -a C:\Users\N4II\AppDat

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.6.1 Error in sound input TS890s

Hi Charlie,I'm hoping you can help me with this, if not then please pass me on to someone who can...Wsjt-x has been working perfectly for years until today. I went to use it today and found I have no audio input from my ts890s.  WSJT-X reports "Error in sound input  - an error opening the radio inp

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc7 rig errors

HI MIke! I have done same findings with latest Hamlib (Hamlib 4.6~git 2024-10-04T03:23:46Z SHA=07e490 64-bit) and latest wsjtx-improved. I have Cqrlog and wsjt-x accessing same rigctld that is started with scirpt. /usr/local/bin/rigctld -m 3073 -r /dev/icom7300 -t 4532 -s 19200 -C auto_power=

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc7 rig errors

That looks like you have something else talking to the rig besides WSJT-X. You're getting answers from different commands. What version of Hamlib do you have? rigctl --version Mike W9MDB On Friday, October 4, 2024 at 10:00:19 PM CDT, Marc Wiz via wsjt-devel wrote: Ubuntu 22.04 WSJ

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc7 rig errors

Ubuntu 22.04 WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc7 compiled locally from source Rig: IC-7300   I built the latest WSJT-X from source.   Since starting to use it I have started seeing more and more errors.  It has occurred multiple times today.    It was also occurring in the last few days.   Here is the output from w

Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected

Adrian, What did your cmake run say about audio ? Did you use cmake ? cmake says nothing at all relating to libqtmultimedia. You can fully compile wsjt-x without it, only you can not select audio input/output devices. The need to install libqtmultimedia */is/* mentioned in the INSTALL fil

Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected

- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:38:43 +1000 From: Adrian To: Pino Zollo,wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Wsjt Improved Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected Message-ID:<77a46f53-cb55-4a05-9a8f-14820a71a...@gmail.c

Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected

Run the real thing ; Debian On 29/8/24 01:33, Pino Zollo wrote: I just made a fresh installation of Mint 22 MATE Then I have compiled both WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc6 and wsjt-x improved 2.7.1 version 240814. Both present the same problem the list of audio devices is empty so none can be sele

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc6

Thank you for such a quick response, my tough luck Hi. Once again, a GREAT job. 73 Henry On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:13 PM Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Henry > > This is explained in the User Guide section 7.5: > > "Except for the special cases involv

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc6

Henry This is explained in the User Guide section 7.5: "Except for the special cases involving /P or /R used in VHF contesting, *WSJT-X 2.7* offers no support for two nonstandard callsigns to work each other." 73 Charlie DL3WDG On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 13:50, Henry Rollandi via wsjt-devel < wsjt

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X V2.7.0-rc6

Greetings,I have been using the rc6 version for just over a month with no issues. I am currently away from QTH and signing ZS5HR/P and have noticed an issue. If I call a station, eg YO4RYU/MM and he comes back to me with a signal report even though TX3 is highlighted , it transmits the TX1 message

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:55:59 -0400 James Shaver via wsjt-devel wrote: > +1 to Hasan - nobody is forcing anyone to use SF.  You're spending > more time splitting hairs about this than any useful output and > wasting everyone's time and bandwidth - the Dev list is becoming less > useful as a result

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

+1 to Hasan - nobody is forcing anyone to use SF.  You're spending more time splitting hairs about this than any useful output and wasting everyone's time and bandwidth - the Dev list is becoming less useful as a result. Go ahead and develop your own thing if all you are going to do is point

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 02:19:51PM +0100, Hibby via wsjt-devel wrote: > Identity and keysigning is a solved problem True. What is required here is a public-key signature scheme. The fox produces a key pair and publishes the public key which is then used by the hounds. The problem is that all p

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

How so? On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 14:05, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Yes, congratulations are in order. You have now made it easy for the > Pirates, before it was somewhat more difficult. > Way to go. > Hasan > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jonathan M

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

Hi Hasan, To be clear, Jonathan has so far posted to the list and not facilitated any pirates! To summarise what is going on (and separate from any tedious license discussions) - in the interests of preventing DXPedition piracy, some people are playing with the new binaries and have surmised t

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

Hasan, No. An insecure algorithm, that no-one has had any opportunity to review due to the source code for the superfox binaries not being published, has made it no more difficult than it previously was for the pirates. Jonathan, GI3JMC On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 2:03 PM Hasan N0AN wrote: > Yes,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

Yes, congratulations are in order. You have now made it easy for the Pirates, before it was somewhat more difficult. Way to go. Hasan On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hasan, > > Did you actually take the time to read **an

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

Hasan, Did you actually take the time to read **and understand** the blog post I linked, and the contents of the similar discussions (linked below) regarding the superfox binaries in the mailing list? https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/wsjt-devel/thread/ZoMmzGysLjXJ5B2O%40msg.df7cb.de/#msg587

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

Jonathon, Then don't use SuperFox Hasan On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:25 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/ > > The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good > thing) by failing t

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X SuperFox Verification is flawed

https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/ The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good thing) by failing to publish any source code for the dedicated superfox binaries to allow for peer review. It is exceptionally misguided. Amateur Radio should be available to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

Hi Kari and all, Unfortunately, this means that our commit a87aacf has not yet completely fixed this error (which we had hoped for), because the "240712" code already has this commit. 73 de DG2YCB, Uwe German Amateur Radio Station DG2YCB Dr. Uwe Risse eMa

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

Kari, ok, I thought you have have just built without install if you run differrent wsjtx versions like I do, running from the build folder. I had that type of error in my case, but it also said it could not find sfrx. Sorry I could not help more. 73 vk4tux On 13/07/2024 5:20 pm, Kari Sill

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

TNX Adrian, but those files are already in place ls -l yhteensä 768 -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 10160 18. 6. 11:59 foxchk -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 287728 18. 6. 11:59 sfrx -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 255944 18. 6. 11:59 sftx $ ls -l /usr/bin/foxchk /usr/bin/sfrx /usr/bin/sftx -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10160 18.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

If you compiled from source ; In your wsjtx-2.7.0/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib path, copy the superfox/arm (or whatever matches your OS) in superfox folder sub OS type folder section files (3) to the other wsjtx program executable's path, eg where wsjtx is... usually these will be foxchk sfr

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

Hi, SuperHound mode crashed with runtime error: Computer: Raspberry Pi 4 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) 64 bit Radio: ICOM IC7300 I left system running overnight and this morning I was greeted by the error message above... 73 de Kari, oh2gqc _

Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] 2.7.x TX/RX cicle at start

For the improved version please turn on Save/Diagnostic and note the time when TX stays on  -- send me the log file. You might have to zip it to make it small enough to send or edit it. Mike W9MDB On Monday, July 8, 2024 at 09:48:22 AM CDT, Bob Losee wrote: My K4 also stays in tra

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X program will not start

When you downloaded the .dmg file, there was also a readme and plist file. You need to follow the instructions in the readme and make sure you restart your Mac as instructed. > On Jun 28, 2024, at 8:34 AM, Thomas via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hello, > > I went back in and joined the list as th

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x 2.7.0-rc4 ARRL field day issue

Never mind figured it out... Thanks On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 9:27 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > Am I missing something? I'm trying to setup my station to run for FD but > when I try to save the configuration it keeps telling me "Invalid Context > Exchange" but I have everything filled out... > > [ima

[wsjt-devel] wsjt-x 2.7.0-rc4 ARRL field day issue

Am I missing something? I'm trying to setup my station to run for FD but when I try to save the configuration it keeps telling me "Invalid Context Exchange" but I have everything filled out... [image: image.png] [image: image.png] Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Bug Report

First let's install a new Hamlib -- then if that doesn't fix things we'll go to the debug stage... New hamlib for installation directions #1 Shut down WSJTX  #2 Download either the 32-bit or 64-bit DLL matching the 32/64-bit version of WSJTX -- hopefully your browser doesn't block it but may w

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Bug Report

I've been annoyed by this for a while and believe I've finally made sense of what's going on. Rig - Yaesu FTDX10 Windows 10 WSJT-X v 2.6.1 6b6d74 When the IF bandwidth on the FTDX10 is set to anything above 3000 HZ the problem will show up after switching modes (from FT8 to FT4 for instance) and

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Spurious Hound TX after band change

This continues to be a problem at my station and it has the potential to damage my equipment as the spurious TX starts before my SteppIR has changed to the new band. Shouldn't WSJT-X clear out all generated messages on band change or, at a minimum, flag that F/H QSO attempt has ended. 73, Andy

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Please place this file as described below https://www.dropbox.com/s/t52ngcalsgnpm8m/wsjtx_log_config.ini?dl=0 C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\WSJT-X The WSJT-X_Rigcontrol.log file will be in the same location Here's a youtube video showing Windows users howto -- https://www.youtube

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Please place this file as described below https://www.dropbox.com/s/t52ngcalsgnpm8m/wsjtx_log_config.ini?dl=0 C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\WSJT-X The WSJT-X_Rigcontrol.log file will be in the same location Here's a youtube video showing Windows users howto -- https://www.youtube

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Usually on click ok, the Config pane pops up on radio tab so you can reconfigure , so you don't see that then, ok ? It would be interesting to confirm a program interface like FLrig, Commander or HRD works, or rigctld/Hamlib interface , rather than actual radio choice. 73 vk4tux On 21/3/2

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

The Rig Control Error window is never displayed. But to answer your question... going into the settings and doing a 'Test CAT' does not restore the connection. -Scott AA5AM On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:11 PM Adrian wrote: > Re below ; If you click 'ok', and then are shown the wsjtx radio settings

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Re below ; If you click 'ok', and then are shown the wsjtx radio settings tab, does 'Test CAT' restore the cat connection ? 73 vk4tux On 21/3/24 09:52, Scott Armstrong via wsjt-devel wrote: The Rig Control Error pop-up message is not raised. image.png When CAT is restored by turning on th

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Hi All, I have encountered a problem running 2.7.0-rc4 with Hamlib version [image: image.png] This impacts an Icom IC-756ProII and IC-746. The issue is not observed when running a IC-9700 The problem is also observed running 2.7.0-rc3 with the new Hamlib version The workaround is to roll back to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

It did show that many differrent linux as well as main Debian advanced flavours were affected. Some source code errors may only affect a limited number of branches, this showed it as widespread. 73 vk4tux On 13/3/24 00:43, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, On 3/11/2024 11:02 PM,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Thank you sir! Compiled and installed successfully. 73 -Jim NU0C On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:43:05 -0400 Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: > Multiple reports of the same issue are not really necessary, especially > after one of us in the development group has already responded. > > Anyway, thank

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Hi all, On 3/11/2024 11:02 PM, Jim Shorney NU0C via wsjt-devel wrote: Confirmed same error, Kubuntu 22.04 up to date as of today. Error: Symbol ‘ncand‘ at (1) is USE associated from module ‘q65‘ and cannot occur in COMMON /home/nu0c/src/build/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Confirmed same error, Kubuntu 22.04 up to date as of today. Error: Symbol ‘ncand‘ at (1) is USE associated from module ‘q65‘ and cannot occur in COMMON /home/nu0c/src/build/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:93:3: 73 -Jim NU0C On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:59:57 + Stan Gammons

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

I'm seeing the same error on Kubuntu 22.04 uname -a Linux radio2 5.15.0-100-generic #110-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 7 13:27:48 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [ 95%] Building Fortran object qmap/libqmap/CMakeFiles/qmap_impl.dir/moon2.f90.o [ 95%] Building Fortran object qmap/libqmap/CMakeFiles/

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Hi Josh, We're aware of the problem you report, but haven't yet got around to correcting it. It does not affect builds on any of the systems we're using for development. Compiler revisions are getting increasingly fussy about such things. You can do one of the following: 1. Wait for the n

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Hi Josh, I got the same error on my Linux Mint 21,1 ( Linux abc 5.15.0-97-generic #107-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 7 13:26:48 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ) but on my Raspberry 5 running Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) ( Linux cde 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-2712 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (202

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

On Fedora Core 39, 64 bit, (uname -a Linux fedora 6.7.7-200.fc39.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Mar 1 16:53:59 UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux, gcc version 13.2.1 20231205 (Red Hat 13.2.1-6) (GCC)) I get the following errors building RC4: [ 94%] Building Fortran object qmap/libqmap/CMakeFiles/qmap_i

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Spurious Hound TX after band change

Several times I have completed an FT8 F/H QSO on one band then changed to another band with Hound mode still active. "Enable TX" is not active and no intended transmissions have yet been made on the newly selected band. However, WSJT-X starts a new transmission to the fox that had been worked

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Failed to start OmniRig COM server

A lot of monitors have built in sound. I have seen crazy things where these monitor sound devices cause strange problems. I would disable all the sound devices in your monitors. Carl Moreschi N4PY 127 River Moss Way Hertford, NC 27944 www.n4py.com On 12/20/2023 8:24 AM, Christopher Wawak via

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Failed to start OmniRig COM server

I have seen this exact scenario with the sound device causing Omnirig to fail to initialize. I can reliably reproduce this and repair it. I've posted about it before to no avail. I have also seen a scenario where the sound devices don't seem to change, but Omnirig fails to initialize even after a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Failed to start OmniRig COM server

It turns out that this problem is very easy to reproduce. First some background on my configuration. The TS-590S has both a USB port and a traditional RS-232 COM port. The USB port connects to an internal USB hub which, in turn, connects to a USB UART for CAT and a PCM2903B USB Audio CODEC.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Failed to start OmniRig COM server

I have it working again. I had disconnected all cables from the laptop to access the battery. When I put it all back together I had swapped the cables for the TS-590S USB port and a 10 port USB hub. I only realized this error when WSJT-X did not see my TS-590S USB audio CODEC. When I put the

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 Failed to start OmniRig COM server

I'm using WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 on a Win 8.1 laptop. I have been using OmniRig as my radio interface for many months and the only issue has been that first start after a new installation WSJT-X will fail to connect to OmniRig. It always connected ok for second and subsequent starts. Now I cannot c

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X parsing of the country file, specifically 4U1A (and others)

I agree. It's good enough as you have it. -- Joe On 12/8/2023 2:50 PM, Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, Once again regarding my question about EU / AS Turkey: My commit only changes the displayed country name. Theoretically, the distinction between continents etc. should th

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X parsing of the country file, specifically 4U1A (and others)

Hi all, Once again regarding my question about EU / AS Turkey: My commit only changes the displayed country name. Theoretically, the distinction between continents etc. should therefore remain unaffected. I have just looked up how LotW and QRZ.com do it. There is also only one entry there, namely

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X parsing of the country file, specifically 4U1A (and others)

This may all be correct, but at least to me, the decisive factor is what the DXCC rules are. And according to the DXCC list available to me, there is only one "Turkey", namely DXCC No. 390. TA-TC* Turkey EU/AS 39 20 390 73 de DG2YCB, U

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >