Hi,
I've been on vacation so not sure how much have been said and done in this
thread yet.
I just want to clearly state that my belief is that an IDE like Eclipse should
not
*prevent* users from doing things outside a spec or usecases if it can be
avoided.
It should merely provide a *warning*
Monday works for me.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raev, Kaloyan
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 10:41 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions
ECTED]
On Behalf Of Chuck Bridgham
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:35 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Yes sorry - I can
"General discussion of project-wide
or architectural issues." , Chuck
Bridgham/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
07/10/2008 01:24 PM
Subject:
RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
I think we have lost the thread here...
Chuck, what is the soonest day you can organize a tel
, July 03, 2008 7:17 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.; Chuck
Bridgham
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Next week works ok for me and I suppose I can do 8 AM PDT if that's
absolutely the only time that makes sense for everyone
21 AM
To: Chuck Bridgham
Cc: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Hi Chuck,
Does this mean you can organize the telecon any day after Thursday from 8:00 AM
to 9:00 AM PDT?
Greetings,
Ka
project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Hi,
This Thursday doesn't work for me, but I can meet next week, any day at
the same time mentioned.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational Java EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Par
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Chuck Bridgham/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED], "General discussion of project-wide
or
architectural issues."
Date:
07/02/2008 08:13 AM
Subject:
RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
It really seems we need a phone call...
Chuck, I remember we had phone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:13 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
I still haven't heard a v
antin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raev, Kaloyan
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:41 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Tim, Konstantin, thank you for your com
s,
Kaloyan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:14 PM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Here are my views on t
cussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Mixing spec levels in EAR. Opinions?
Hi Kaloyan,
Thank you for raising this issue. I agree we are inconsistent in parts, and
although we don't necessarily need to resolve all of the issues immediately we
should at leas
Hi Kaloyan,
Thank you for raising this issue. I agree we are inconsistent in parts,
and although we don't necessarily need to resolve all of the issues
immediately we should at least have a common definition of what is
'correct' and may eventually be supported by WTP.
Among the IBM committers
13 matches
Mail list logo
