Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-20 Thread Reghunath B
Bret, Energised by the support I am getting from this group, I also would like to contribute in what ever small way I could with the documentation for 1.5 or later. Raghunath From: "Jason Alexander" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: wtr-general@rubyforge.orgTo: wtr-general@rubyforge.orgSubject: Re:

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Zeljko Filipin
+1 Zeljko On 9/19/06, Matt Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bret, this seems like a reasonable message to put on that page. ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Charley Baker
I completely agree. People have to understand that while there are a lot of great reasons to use 1.5, it is still a work in progress and does take a higher level of skill and for lack of better terms, personal discovery, to use. -Charley On 9/18/06, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Alan Ark
18, 2006 4:58 PM To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org Subject: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org: Watir 1.5 is currently under active development. However, it remains poorly

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Bret Pettichord
I just realized that i didn't write what i meant to write. No wonder so many people were agreeing with me. What I meant to say was that 1.4 is ALSO incompletely documented, etc. We've seen a fair amount of sarcasm and indignation on this list lately and it seems to be directed at the

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Jason Alexander
-general@rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer I just realized that i didn't write what i meant to write. No wonder so many people were agreeing with me. What I meant to say was that 1.4 is ALSO incompletely documented, etc. We've seen a fair amount of sarcasm and indignation

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-19 Thread Sun
I would be open to helping with the documentation. I think part of the effort is not just upgraded documentation, but the organizational perspective fof the documentation. For a single example -- is the base or root for documentation the http://wtr.rubyforge.org/ site? As it happens, the user

[Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-18 Thread Bret Pettichord
Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org: Watir 1.5 is currently under active development. However, it remains poorly documented. Users often have to read through a confusing email archive to find

Re: [Wtr-general] Disclaimer

2006-09-18 Thread Matt Johnson
Bret Pettichord wrote: Based on recent feedback, i am thinking that we need to add the following information to the main Watir webpage at wtr.rubyforge.org: Watir 1.5 is currently under active development. However, it remains poorly documented. Users often have to read through a