On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Jay Hurt wrote:
> >
> > Xastir uses GPRMC for course/speed, GPGGA for altitude.
> >
>
> Thanks Curt, I'll make sure I'm passing those.
If it's decoding them you'll see it say something like
"GPRMC,GPGGAA" on the status line each time it decodes them. Check
the Configure->
Xastir uses GPRMC for course/speed, GPGGA for altitude.
Thanks Curt, I'll make sure I'm passing those.
Jay
73 de N0XVB
_
Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free
trip!
http://www.imagine-windows
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:02:02PM -0600, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> OK, this is weird.
>
> First, it compiles fine now, and dbfawk compiles and works.
>
> When I bring it up all looks OK. When I zoom in, though, I am
> suddenly in
another thought: only the _labels_ are showing; I don't see any
actual map features.
-Jason
kg4wsv
___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
OK, this is weird.
First, it compiles fine now, and dbfawk compiles and works.
When I bring it up all looks OK. When I zoom in, though, I am
suddenly in Briscoe County not far from the city of Mena. Only
problem is, there is no Briscoe county or city names Mena in the
state, much less ne
Hmm. Well geos was at 2.2.1 so I downloaded and installed 2.2.3 from
source, no problems. I have gdal-1.3.2 compiling now, we'll see how it goes
this time through.
I sure hate package management tools and binary installs, this has been a
complete PITA. Slack never gave me any problems, but
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, James Ewen wrote:
> That should reduce the number of newbie questions by a fair bit, and make
> Xastir a little more user friendly.
>
> Xastir is one of the most feature laden APRS programs out there, with the
> BEST developer support available. The biggest detractor in my min
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote:
> Yep. Now that you point that out I'm seeing pretty much the same thing on
> FreeBSD. In fact, I also see the same thing you're seeing in that the
> dynamically linked version is slightly larger than the static-linked version.
>
> This is a little strange,
That should reduce the number of newbie questions by a fair bit, and make
Xastir a little more user friendly.
Xastir is one of the most feature laden APRS programs out there, with the
BEST developer support available. The biggest detractor in my mind is the
difficulty in initially gettting the pr
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:29:00AM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> Shapelib Shapelib Shapelib-Int Shapelib-Ext
> Internal External Stripped Stripped
> xastir: 2404899 2404943 1101020
Shapelib Shapelib Shapelib-Int Shapelib-Ext
Internal External Stripped Stripped
xastir: 2404899 2404943 1101020 1101020
testawk:53536 53600 19128 19160
These sizes are with all regular options plus rtree support compiled
in,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:40:28AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:47:33AM -0600, we recorded a bogon-computron
> collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> >
> > Just did another cvs updat
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 06:43:23AM -0800, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote:
>
> > > GDAL does not use shapelib. It has its own shapefile handling.
> >
> > Which, of course, is nothing more than slightly
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Tom Russo wrote:
> > GDAL does not use shapelib. It has its own shapefile handling.
>
> Which, of course, is nothing more than slightly modified versions of
> shapelib routines. But the fact that gdal has always peacefully coexisted
> with shapelib when it was a shared libr
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:47:33AM -0600, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
>
> Just did another cvs update and tried again. noticed that we're
> using a library instead of linking 'em in.
>
> Still no joy. looks like something is missing
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, David Flood wrote:
> An updated ImageMagick package has been released for Cygwin and this seems
> to fix the previous issues. So far I've tested it on Windows ME (note,
> Windows 9x/ME soon will not be supported by Cygwin) and Windows 2000, both
> with good results.
>
> I'm s
Just did another cvs update and tried again. noticed that we're
using a library instead of linking 'em in.
Still no joy. looks like something is missing in the link paths:
gcc -g -O2 -pipe -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-
unused-parameter -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/
17 matches
Mail list logo
